Preview

Argumentative Essay: Locker Searches In Schools

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
713 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: Locker Searches In Schools
Locker Searches “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”(Hang Together) those words were spoken by Benjamin Franklin while signing the Declaration of Independence. However, is our country “hanging separately” because of schools? If we must hang together, why do teachers not trust us enough that they have to search our locker for illegal drugs or weapons? Even though some people argue that locker searches can prevent illegal substances and weapons from entering the school, locker searches may decrease the trust from the students while they create unnecessary pauses from the learning process and being just as wrong as regular searches. To start off, locker searches may create unnecessary breaks in the learning …show more content…
Not only did that unnecessary break happen but, “In another case, a principal and two teachers in Kansas City, Missouri, were suspended with pay after twenty-three elementary school students were strip-searched in an effort to locate five dollars in missing lunch money. A female teacher allegedly took the girls into a restroom and had them strip down to their underwear when no one admitted taking the money. A male physical education teacher executed the same procedure with male students. The money was later found in the boy's restroom but was not located as part of either search.”(Essex) This piece of evidence shows another break from the learning environment to find a couple dollars, this shows the distrust in teachers to students from the teachers searching students, but ultimately finding the money in a different place. In addition, in the case of Bellnier v. Lund, the Plaintiff Leonti said he had 4 dollars when …show more content…
Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This case brings the question up of was T.LO's rights broken or not. The fourth amendment is the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. T.L.O is the person who sued because she felt that the contents in her bag were only found because it was searched unlawfully. In Juvenile Court it was decided that there had been no Fourth Amendment violation. T.L.O was searched without probably cause of any illegal activity. The fact that she was smoking cigarettes in school have the principle no reason to think she is dealing marijuana.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    T.L.O. is a case that argued the right to privacy rights at school. The result of this case was that students belongings can be searched but not for no good reason. Furthermore, the case started when a fourteen year old student at Piscataway High School in New Jersey was caught smoking in a bathroom by a teacher. Once the student was caught her purse was then searched by the teacher. Found in the purse was a pack of cigarettes, rolling papers, and a small amount of marijuana. Because of the belongings discovered by the teacher, police were called in and the fourteen year old student openly admitted to selling drugs on school property. Furthermore, during her trial she was found guilty and was put on probation. However, fourteen year old, Terry argued that the search of her purse was a violation of the fourth amendment, “unreasonable searches and seizures.” This case is a great example of a landmark case because it started the beginning of future decisions regarding searches and seizures at…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court has a long history of upholding citizens' protections against unreasonable searches and seizures a right guaranteed by the 4th Amendment. In 1914, the Court ruled that evidence obtained by police illegally is not admissible in federal court a practice known as the exclusionary rule. In 1980, a teacher at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County, New Jersey, found T.L.O. and another girl smoking in a restroom a place that was by school rule a nonsmoking area. The two girls were taken to the principal's office where T.L.O.'s friend admitted that she had been smoking in the restroom. T.L.O. denied smoking there. She denied that she smoked at all. An assistant vice-principal demanded to see T.L.O.'s purse. Searching through it he found a pack of cigarettes. He also found rolling papers, a pipe, marijuana, a large wad of dollar bills, and two letters that indicated that T.L.O. was involved in marijuana dealing at the high school. T.L.O. was taken to the police station where she confessed that she had sold marijuana at the school. A juvenile court sentenced her to a year's probation. The State Supreme Court overturned the decision, stating that T.L.O.'s 4th Amendment rights had been violated. But White agreed with a lower court finding that a “school official may properly conduct a search of a student's person if the official has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed or reasonable cause to believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline….” In other words, in a school, a search could be reasonable under the 4th Amendment without probable cause, so long as it was supported by reasonable suspicion or reasonable cause. The assistant vice-principal's search was considered reasonable under this definition. In 1985, the Supreme Court, by a 6-3 margin, ruled that New Jersey and the school had met a "reasonableness" standard for conducting such searches at school. The high court…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Best V. New Jersey Case

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    School administrators and law enforcement officers have different regulations when a search or seizure is being conducted, especially concerning that of a minor. School administrators only need reasonable suspicion to search a student while law enforcement officers must have probable cause. In the cases of Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding, the issues of search and seizure of a student in school are laid out in different scenarios that clearly portray the difference between a constitutional search and an unconstitutional search. The concept of reasonable suspicion is sufficient for the extended search in the Best V. New Jersey case because the student was in clear violation of school policy and the search was necessary to maintain safety and order in the school;…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Random Locker Searchs

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page

    First and foremost, irregular locker searches help to reduce violence and drug use in schools. Randomized locker searches help to find any weapons or drugs being hidden by student in lockers. THe searches can help to save lives, if there is a weapon found. If it is suspected that the student id breaking a law, or even school rule, a locker search may be carried out to see if the allegations are true.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Project

    • 5430 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Is it unlawful for an agency to permit random searches to take place of students’ clothes, backpacks, lockers, and desks?…

    • 5430 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aed 200 Week 4

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When it comes to random student locker searches, I feel that all teachers have the responsibility to give any information that they may have concerning any illegal acts that their students are involved in. If this information leads to the administration searching that student’s locker, then it is being done to make sure all the students are being kept safe. I do not feel that anyone’s locker should be searched without a significant amount of proof or suspicion. It should not be done just because the student is considered a trouble maker. Though a student may be breaking the law or rules of the school, I feel that the student still has the right to have their privacy protected. When searching the locker, I feel that some discretion needs to be taken. Allowing the student body to know why and when another student’s locker is being searched would be, in my opinion, considered an infringement on their privacy. I feel that all of the students rights should always be protected. It goes with the old rule of thumb, innocent until proven guilty. Even when found guilty, the rights of the students should still be protected, but only to the extent that it maintains the safety of the student body. For example, if nothing is found during the search, not only could this be embarrassing to the student, it could also be an embarrassment to the school administration. On the other hand, if a gun were to be found in the student’s locker, then that student would not have the right to just leave the school. Their rights would be limited in order to keep the rest of the students safe.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Students could start purloin other people's possessions, start pickpocketing, and start going through other people's merchandise. All of this theft needs to be stopped and that is why locker searches are very imperative to our schools.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there are many schools that does do locker searches, other schools don't do locker searches. There are some schools that have found materials in lockers that others are not supposed to have at school. Also there are many schools that don't do locker searches that should.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What if you were a teacher and an armed intruder came into your school? How would you protect your students and yourself? If we allowed teachers to carry a firearm that is stored in a locked container a student would not be able to acquire the weapon, and only in emergency situations would the teacher be allowed to remove it from the container. If there was to be a situation where an intruder entered the school building the teacher would be able to protect themselves and the students. There should; however, be a…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tlo Argumentative Essay

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    TLO argued that her Fourth Amendment rights were violated, but why? In 1984, a teacher found two girls in the New Jersey school bathroom smoking cigarettes. They were then sent to the principal's office for interrogation. Immediately the second girl admitted to this crime, but TLO held her own. TLO was a 14-year-old girl named Tracy Lois Odem, she remained anonymous until recently.The principal, Ted Choplick, demanded that he searches her purse. Choplick found rolls, paraphernalia-marijuana, money, a list of names, and a box of cigarettes, he then excluded the contents. After being arrested TLO said due to the Fourth Amendment, stating “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”, that Choplick invaded her privacy, which is unconstitutional…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    14th Amendment Essay

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The lockers have been given to the students expecting them to take care of it and being responsible over it. What is the need to go through it? I have been given a locker since sixth grade and never once has a teacher much less a principle gone through my locker. If they were to go through my locker it would make me feel like i'm a suspect for something I have no connection with.On our way into school each day student’s book bags are checked each day. There have even been instances in which the security guards have taken over an hour to go through the student's belongings, while teachers, administrators and principals go through without being checked not only is it hypocritical but unjust. Teenagers should be given the benefit of the doubt. I have been present in an event where a teacher unjustifiably read his messages out loud after his phone rang in class without him even having it in his hands. It wasn't in the teacher’s responsibility nor authority to go through his messages much less reveal his messages.We are called the next generation yet we are restricted to are given liberty's by others insecurities. If people can't practice what they preach then they should change their speech. I would rather be considered a rebellious teenager than a lying hypocrite.Trust has become nothing but a blur and a silver lining with perseption, perseption is all that they can see in the end of the…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    T.L.O. decision. In the case of Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton the court approved of random drug testing of athletic students based on no suspicion or "reasonableness" at all. Writing for the opinion of the court Justice Scalia says that, "A search unsupported by probable cause can be constitutional, we have said, 'when special needs, beyond the normal need for law enforcement, make the warrant and probable-cause requirement impracticable.'" He then goes on to argue that "We have found such 'special needs' to exist in the public-school context. There the warrant requirement 'would unduly interfere with the maintenance of the swift and informal disciplinary procedures [that are] needed, 'and strict adherence to the requirement that searches be based upon probable cause' would undercut 'the substantial need of teachers and administrators for freedom to maintain order in the schools.'…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To frisk, or not to frisk? That is the question many may be asking after the first presidential debate on September 26th, 2016. During that debate, the topic of ‘stop and frisk’ came about and Donald Trump strongly advocated the extensive use of it. Lester Holt, the debate’s moderator, interjected himself into the conversation and attempted to fact-check Trump by claiming, erroneously so, that ‘stop and frisk’ is unconstitutional. So, is this policing policy being utilized appropriately?…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do you feel when you’re trying to get by in the hallways, but you have two lovebirds in front of you having the time of their life, while you’re about to throw up? OR when you see a couple having makeout sessions at their lockers making it impossible to get your stuff? After all, schools are meant for showing public displays of affection, right? Wrong. Schools are meant for education, where you go to learn. When you want to say hi or bye to your boy or girlfriend, make it a quick hug, move your way to class, and don’t get in the way of anyone else. In some schools, PDA and any physical contact has been banned because some students don’t have the ability to make appropriate choices between inappropriate and appropriate physical contact. It’s disrespectful towards your peers and teachers, and school is not the place for it.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays