Preview

Argumentative Essay: Should We Bring Back Species Wiped Out?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
689 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: Should We Bring Back Species Wiped Out?
There are many questions that humans have been asking for years, one of them being, should scientists bring back species humanity has wiped out? Everyone has their own opinion on this subject, just as they do in every other situation. Some exclaim “Yes! Is that even a question?” while others wholeheartedly disagree. What’s my opinion? Should we bring back species humanity has wiped out, if so which one? I have no answer for this question, directly. I can say, with certainty, that we should not bring any single species back. If we bring back one species, the earth could be thrown off balance due to the fact that it has adapted to life without them. Other species could be wiped out if that one we brought back was carnivorous, if it was a herbivore, plant species could be wiped out. There would be nothing to regulate the new animals population and it could completely take over.
On the other hand we could bring back all of the species humanity has wiped out. This though could be nearly impossible. First we would have to find way to create the species that humans have drove to extinction. Then we would have to release them in their natural
…show more content…
There are a great number of benefits to biodiversity, therefore I’ll only explain to you a few. First of all each species helps keep the ecosystem balanced. It’s like an assembly line. Everyone has their part to play and if we all do it well the end product will work smoothly. But, if one person, in this case entire species, fails to do their part, the product or ecosystem will not run properly. Each species has their part and biodiversity allows those parts to be played. Without it only there would be no assembly line and no end product.When the ecosystem is running smoothly the better chances of the earth population growing. The more species there are the easier it is for the different species to live. If there are more species the bigger the variety of food for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Humans are the reason for the sixth extinction. Species are dropping at an incredibly fast rate. This is mostly because of climate change and ocean acidification affecting the planets biodiversity. As the climate changes animals are unable to adapt. For an example as the earth begins to warm, ice begins to melt, which will cause major harm for animals, including us. With the ice melting it will cause polar bears to have reduce access to food which will cause harm to their bodies and there cubs. These events are happening all over the world and humans are the only ones who can stop…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sci 207 Week 1

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Extinction is a natural selection process. Should humans strive to preserve a representative sample of all biomes or aquatic zones?…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stuart Pimm offers a degree in Conservation Ecology from Duke University. His Argument focuses largely on humans are not ready for De-Extinction in that since humans were the ones that pushed them to disappear, they are not going to want those species back. He gives the example that “hunters at [the Pyrenean ibex] to extinction. Reintroduce a resurrected ibex to the area where it belongs and it will become the most expensive cabrito every eaten.” He notes that the problem is whether we can resurrect these species or not, but more along the lines of whether the rest of the population will accept the animals back in their original homes. He also believes that De-Extinction “seduces” those granting research money and support into thinking they are doing well when it simply gives “unscrupulous developers a veil to hide their rapaciousness, with promises to fix things later.”…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is believed Earth may be in the midst of another mass extinction, also known as 'The Sixth Mass Extinction '. This mass extinction is the first for 65 million years since the Cretaceous-Tertiary period. "It 's the next annihilation of vast numbers of species. It is happening now, and we, the human race, are its cause ' (Leakey, 1995). Every year, between 17,000 and 100,000 species vanish from our planet, which will result in fifty per cent of the Earth 's species vanishing inside the next 100 years.…

    • 772 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    passenger pigeon, and the great herds of bison that once roamed the prairie. The land was…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we brought back extinct animals, it would take a lot of funds and research, causing us to forget about other research projects. In Mrs. Zielinski’s article she told us that it could cost millions of dollars to resurrect a species. We could use the funds to do more research on things to benefit us, like cancer research, which is an actual problem in today's world, unlike this made-up problem. If we go on with this, we could forget about endangered animals, since we could revive them. Organizations could lost what little funding they already have, thanks to this huge waste of money and research.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The possibility that mammoths, passenger pigeons, saber-toothed cats, and thylacine may roam the very earth our feet stand upon once again is a thrilling, yet apprehensive thought. Carl Zimmer proposes this very idea in his essay “Reviving Species” and gives feedback on the topic of de-extinction. According to Zimmer, de-extinction is defined as, “The notion of bringing vanished species back to life”, and he elaborates the pros and cons of actually completing this ordeal (31). Reading the differentiating views on the subject is very interesting, and caused me to think more and more as to if bringing back the extinct species is for the good or bad of our world. But as a firm believer in Christianity, I feel de-extinction is a sensitive subject and is “… playing God.”, especially if…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The issue should never be about the extinction of any animal, it should always be about the cruelty and exploitation which will lead to their extinction,” unknown. Each and every animal on earth has as much right to be here as you, me, and of all humanity. Scientists have found a way to clone extinct species. The thought of that sounds amazing and really exciting, but think about it another way. If we bring back no longer existing animals, us humans will do what we do best, which is changing nature and destroying it, basically killing them for money or being greedy for food. According to text “no,” there are already many living things becoming extinct many times faster than normal. Why would we worry about animals who are already long gone when there are many other things that are important to the environment that we need to care about? Another reason why we should not bring them back is because our Earth has changed significantly since they were alive. Having them back would change many things. Lastly, education costs lots of money.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No to De Extinction

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whether it is bringing people back from the dead or resurrecting an entire extinct species, for hundreds of years, scientists everywhere have had the desire and craving to try and reverse nature’s kiss of death. Modern scientists are exploring the possibility of resurrecting species, that we and our ancestors led to extinction, through the process of de-extinction or also known as “resurrection biology”. Scientists believe that this project would not only allow us to redeem our mistakes but also provide breakthroughs in the field of genetic engineering. This concept was first presented to the public in Steven Spielberg’s 1993 film, Jurassic Park that also shows how there are much greater repercussions of this experiment than there could be scientific gains. Even though these projects have purely good intentions, similarly to Frankenstein’s experiment, good intentions of a science experiment, which tampers with life and death, often have a greater chance of going south and causing more danger than benefit. Although astounding scientific breakthroughs may come to be as the result of a successful de-extinction project, there are many greater dangers that could develop for the human race through bringing back certain extinct species. While evolution may be cruel, it is never wrong therefore there was a reason for the species to have gone extinct in the first place and the natural cycle of life and death should not be tampered with artificially.…

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    So who cares if a bird or two goes extinct? Or an elephant? Or a bug? To most people it doesn’t really matter. But species extinction is a great moral wrong. Every species has a role in its ecosystem and by intruding on the natural balance of things and thus causing the early extinction of species we are throwing the natural balance out of whack and reducing biodiversity. Biodiversity is key in surviving ecological hardship. When difficult situations arise, it is up to species to adapt and evolve to overcome. By intervening and accelerating the hardship of not just one species, but entire ecosystems, we are creating so much stress of the species present that they simply cannot adapt or evolve quick enough in such a short span of time. Thus, human actions are directly responsible for the extinction of many species, which directly correlates to a decrease in genetic and biodiversity. It is hard to deny that we rely on, and take for granted, all of the species and their roles in their ecosystem and how they keep things afloat. And by irreparably damaging these systems, we are directly relating to our ability to gather supplies such as food sources and lumber and agriculture in the future. Thus it falls upon humanity to act accordingly to try and prevent the damage we will cause if we continue “business as usual” in the…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donlan et al, 2005, emphasizes that humans owe an ethical responsibility to redress the loss of megafauna during the Pleistocene era and to prevent further extinctions of extant megafauna. Humans…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All species, in some way shape or form, rely on other species, “everything is connected”. If one species is taken from this world, there will be a chain of events that follows, similar the the butterfly effect. If an organism such as the honeybee is removed, multiple species humans live off of like plants and animals will also die…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Would it also change the way we think about looking after the animals that we have, it might make us think that it doesn’t matter the way we treat animals because we could just bring them back if the species dies? If we were to bring some species back do we know what sort of viruses these animals carry, one of these viruses could be a mega-virus that could kill the entire human race? Depending on what animals we bring back some of these animals have been dead for millions of years and would be completely foreign to the environment we live in now. If we start bringing back animals it may also change our priorities and make us focus more on bringing back animals than trying to solve medical problems we have at the moment.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The answer to many diseases or symptoms, could be right in front of our faces. While other people are out for blood on this matter, most people don’t think that that is a good idea. Ridding the Earth of another species is like getting rid of a single important component in a machine. The world is affected by it and loses one of its many species causing whatever good that that species did to fall on the back of another, setting off many chain…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, I believe that humans should be concerned with the extinction rate. Humans are the cause of things such as habitat destruction, hunting, pollution, disease, global warming, exploitation and urbanization which are all leading to the extinction of many species. Not all species are affected by all of these factors, but all species are affected by at least one.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays