First of all, charter schools don't have to follow as many government guidelines on their curriculums, so they have more freedom of what they can teach to their students. Another thing they say is better is limited class sizes. Due to the lottery type entry system, they can keep classes smaller, thus making a lower student to teacher ratio. This gives teachers more time with each student. More time with each student could lead to a better education. However, many of these theories haven't been proven true, and I still think charter schools don't have enough upside to keep
First of all, charter schools don't have to follow as many government guidelines on their curriculums, so they have more freedom of what they can teach to their students. Another thing they say is better is limited class sizes. Due to the lottery type entry system, they can keep classes smaller, thus making a lower student to teacher ratio. This gives teachers more time with each student. More time with each student could lead to a better education. However, many of these theories haven't been proven true, and I still think charter schools don't have enough upside to keep