Preview

Aristotle Research Paper

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1173 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle Research Paper
Rebecca Ellis
Philosophy 105L
Introduction to Philosophy
11/4/08

Fr. Bruce Taggart, O. Carm., Ph.D., Instructor

Aristotle; The Introduction of Physics Aristotle was born in Stagira, Macedonia during the fourth century Before Common Era. At this time period Macedonia was a semi-Hellenized area in the Balkan Peninsula. Aristotle’s father was a physician. The fact that his father had a profession in society makes people wonder if that is what sparked Aristotle’s interest in his surroundings, or his senses, and biology, or the study of life. In 384 BCE when Aristotle was eighteen years old he entered Plato’s Academy and remained there for twenty years. During his time at the Academy he was most intrigued by the observation, research
…show more content…

He didn’t agree that there was a world of immaterial forms perceived by the soul and then another world of individual material things perceived by the body. He also objected to Plato’s belief that there is a perfect form apart from the worldly forms. For instance according to Plato if there are 10 dogs on the world there are 11 dogs altogether because there is one more perfect one in the transcendental world. Aristotle believed there were only as many forms as there were in this world. In order then to understand the world Aristotle created his “science of nature” or Physics. He was very big into classification and is the man responsible for the classification of animal, vegetable, or mineral that we still use. At the heart of Aristotle’s Physics is his Four Causes. The causes are the formal, efficient, material, and final. The formal cause is the definition of form that makes us what we are. An example would be a dog can never be a cat because he has the dog form, his formal cause is dog. The efficient cause is what brought us to existence, for a baby this would be the parents. The third cause is the material cause. This is what we are made up of, and it is the same in all objects within the same form. This is like in humans we all have same amount of chromosomes, our material make up is exactly the same. The last cause is the final cause. This is the purpose of the form. For a child this …show more content…

I think there is more to know and learn about him than any other philosopher that I have been exposed to. I knew of his theory of forms before and his virtue of golden mean, but I had never heard of is concept of his causes, which are like the basis of his physics. I think that Aristotle was the closest to actually creating an idea that people could just follow without being extremely radical. His concepts seemed very general. For instance, if starting today I tried to live by Aristotle’s way of thinking I think I could pretty much do it. I already practice the virtue of golden mean when I eat. I don’t want to eat too much, but I don’t want to starve either. Also I think that I believe in his four causes, they all make sense to me. There is obviously something that brought me into this word, I am made up of material, I do have the same basic form as a European human because I am human and I do believe I have a purpose. Also I agree with Aristotle that each person poses a soul within them. I am religious, and Plato’s theory seemed to be more religious than Aristotle’s, but seem to agree with Aristotle on the soul issue. One thing I wish I knew about Aristotle was if his father’s occupation inspired him to look at life through the scientific eye. All throughout school we had to classify and observe and I really find it interesting that the idea of that came from Aristotle during BCE. Another thing that I do which is inspired by Aristotle

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s Forms were found within this world. An object, x, could be defined as a being of a type X, because objects of the type X are the only thing in the universe which have four particular causes.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle sees universals as being the object of understanding things. Aristotle’s views on forms are more connected with the soul. He see the form as not being eternal, unchanging and outside of space. Like for instance the arrangement of matter, because matter is what things are made out of. His definition of the form determines the activities of objects, and what they do exactly. An example of his view on objects is that all things have a natural purpose, and was made to do exactly what it was made to do and nothing else. Aristotle was basically…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matrix 2

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle and classical Greek learning: Some works of the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384–322 b.c.e.) had always been known in Western Europe, but beginning in the eleventh century, medieval thought was increasingly shaped by a great recovery of Aristotle’s works and a fascination with other Greek authors; this infusion of Greek rationalism into Europe’s universities shaped intellectual…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato felt that there are two different levels of reality compared to Aristotle who felt that there was only one level of reality. Plato’s way of thinking always came from ideas from within that were applied to the outside world as opposed to Aristotle whose ideas came from the outside world and then were applied within. These contrast ideas were a result in Aristotle believing that there is one level of reality. He believed that there was only one world, and that forms existed in particular things. Aristotle felt that everything was matter, and certain kinds of matter were composed into different things. He believed that form did not have a separate existence, but existed in matter. Plato, however, believed that there were two levels of reality. Physical and mental were two different things in his eyes. Physical is what is real and you can see and/or touch, and mental is what seems to be real but cannot be seen such as air. Plato believed that there are “two worlds” and that everything real has a form but does not symbolize that form.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Title

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Platonist

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle and Plato were two men with different theories. Although they had some aspects in common, each had their understandings and meanings. Here I will explain what were their beliefs and how these philosophers interpreted each word with its true value. Also with the information, I will try to undercover the meaning of why people used to say people were born either as a Platonist or as a Aristotelian.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the advantages of being a franchise is that you get support from the franchisor. The business will have connections and assistance to obtaining financial support from the bank it that would be easy to buy a franchisor with high reputation because the bank would lend money as the risk of bankrupt is low.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s thoughts tended to believe in two levels of reality. Plato held that metaphysics is dualistic: he proposed that there are two different kinds of things - physical and mental. There is what appears real and what is real. Plato believed that everything real takes on a form but doesn't embody that form. on the other hand, Aristotle’s beliefs lead to him seeing only one level of reality. He felt there was only one imminent world and that forms existed within particular things. Aristotle held that form had no separate existence and existed in matter. in nature, we never find matter without form or form without matter. substance is always a composition of form and matter.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle In Blade Runner

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Few have had as much of an influence in as many fields of thought as Aristotle has. Plato’s pupil and consequently Alexander’s mentor, possibly the first polymath, the ripples of the Macedonian’s teachings are still being felt all across the world and formed the basis for Western culture for over a millennia until the arrival of the Scientific Revolution. Following from this, in this essay one will explore into Aristotle’s views on tragedy and final causation and comprehend how these can be applied to the movie Blade Runner. Aristotle, in his Metaphysics, laid the ground down for his theories of substance, of which the most important and influential one would be the final cause, or telos. This theory provided an explanation to the natural position of each…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Research Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He thought that each thing or event has more than one reason that helps to explain what, why, and where that thing or event is. Greek thinkers from earlier on thought that only one kind of cause could explain itself. Aristotle, on the other hand, said four could. The four causes he spoke of were: material cause, efficient cause, formal cause, and the final cause. For example, he would say that the material cause of a house is the supplies from which it was built. The efficient cause of the house would be the builder. The formal cause would be the shape the builder decided upon. The final cause would be the house's function, to be a home. Aristotle said that something could be understood more when its causes are in specific terms rather than in general ones. Therefore, Aristotle would say that it is more informative to know that a builder built the house rather than to know that it was built by a man. Even further, he would say that it was more informative to know who the builder was rather than just knowing that a builder built…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Aristotle’s teachings are still around today and what started as just another student of Plato, has turned into one of the greatest philosophers ever in the world. So although he suffered through hardships, he never would have become who he was without those hurdles. He is someone that made the most of his life and I hope to do the same with mine. Although some of his theories were wrong, the ones that were correct were groundbreaking for the time and he will always be remembered as one of the greatest philosophers…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The shorthand way of describing Aristotle's view of the soul and its relationship to the body, is to say that the soul of an axe is cutting, the soul of an eye is seeing, and the soul of a man is thinking. In other words, everything has a form or an essence, which is shown in its primary activity. The soul is what makes a thing what it is.…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The statement argues that Aristotle’s theory of the four causes is impossible to apply to everyday life and cannot be applied to the real world. Aristotle believed there are four causes that determine what things are and their purpose and claims this is how we differentiate one thing from another. These four causes are known as the material cause, the efficient cause, the formal cause and most importantly for Aristotle, the final cause, and these together describe how ‘things’ transform from the state of actuality to potentiality. To some extent the theory of the four causes could be accurate and plausible, however, some of the ideas behind it is flawed and unrealistic. In this essay I will cover the three main faults of Aristotle’s theory. Namely, its lack of clarity, that the theory is based on assumptions and that there is no evidence to support the existence of the prime mover.…

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    view, the ends of things are seen as providing the meaning for all that has…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics