Preview

Aristotle's Hylomorphism: What Makes Us Real?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1466 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle's Hylomorphism: What Makes Us Real?
The question of what is real and what makes us real has been a philosophical question with many different answers. Aristotle’s theory of Hylomorphism explains the reality of the universe, objects, and people in a materialistic way. Hylomorphism is the depiction that every physical thing is composed of two things: Matter and Form. Matter is the potency, or the potential of the physical object or being and the Form is its essence. Aristotle describes substance or Form as the truest and primary sense of the word. It is not predicable or present of a subject. In Aristotle’s work Organon I, he describes substance in the terms of the individual ‘man’ which is also included in the species ‘man’ but of the genus ‘animal’. So that the species ‘man’ is primary and the genus ‘animal’ is the secondary substance (Organon, 2012). Aristotle explains that the color of ‘man’s’ body which may be white could only exist in the individual’s body. However, if the individual did not exist then the color white could not be present in the body. Substance and the Primary Sense of Being in Aristotle, a scholarly journal by Angus Brook, includes the theory of Hylomorphism and gives insight to the idea that substance is …show more content…
The essence is the substantial realty, as Aristotle writes, and that the Form is the source of mobility. This is in reference to his Motion Theory in which the Earth changed and evolved by the ‘Prime Mover’ which is Form without Matter. Though, Matter must have Form in order to exist. He goes on to state that the essence is the cause of anything but some things may be produced from one another such as the four elements: Earth, air, fire, and water. They may be created by combination or separation and this makes a difference in the “posteriority”. This means that combining the elements, or destroying these elements can create a new

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle had viewed the self/psyche as inseparable from the body, as the form and the…

    • 335 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s Forms were found within this world. An object, x, could be defined as a being of a type X, because objects of the type X are the only thing in the universe which have four particular causes.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato divides the soul in to three parts: The reasoning or thinking part of the soul, the spirit or willing part of the soul and the base appetites. Plato illustrates this with his allegory of the charioteer in which a charioteer symbolising reason struggles to keep a white horse symbolising spirit and a dark horse symbolising appetite in control. This self-control is what will be achieved by a long period of education and self-discipline. However, we have cause to seek a more plausible account of substance dualism. This is because Plato’s arguments all pre suppose the truth of the theory of forms.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Substance dualism is a never ending argument in the Philosophy world as it’s been going on for decades. It is the view that the universe contains two important types of entity which is mental and material. The structure of this paper is that four main argument leads to one conclusion. Firstly, I’ll argue about Descartes’s ‘separability argument’ which stands as the definition of Substance Dualism. Secondly, I’ll argue that mental and physical have different and perhaps irreconcilable properties. An argument is not complete without a counter argument which in this case the “pairing” problem that exists in Descartes theory is highlighted and where is the interaction of material and immaterial takes place in our body is argued. Finally, the reply for the counter argument comes in a form of defense and positive argument in favors substance dualism and the weakness with the objection.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However philosophers such as Aristotle (a pupil of Plato’s) argue that the body and soul are dependant of each other and that one cannot survive without the other. Aristotle believed the soul is the form, like the characteristics of a sculpture. He talks about how the soul is merely description of the essence or properties of the body. It is our human personality and abilities. Aristotle believed that the soul was inseparable to the body and that it cannot be divided. The soul is said to be essential to us, we are body and soul. Aristotle used the example of…

    • 698 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two of the greatest and earliest thinkers of our time are Plato, and his most famous pupil, Aristotle. Soon after Plato’s teachings, Aristotle criticized his claims and independently became a thinker on his own. These philosophers viewed metaphysics differently, and they approached the idea of reality in two opposing ways. Plato’s Theory of Forms was a concept that was defined in a different way by Aristotle. They both believed in “forms” but approached this idea differently.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Platonist

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As mentioned before, Aristotle has different theories than Plato. He suggests that the forms can be discovered through a examination of the world being natural. Now, Plato believes that forms are farther than what humans can understand, it is way beyond.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle, although the student of Plato, had a very different outlook on the theory of physical and universal forms. He is well known to have provided one of the most famous criticisms of The Forms in his ‘Third Man Argument’. He derived that if a man is a copy of the ‘Form of Man’ and that every object in the physical world has a copy in the World of Forms; there therefore must be a copy of the copy of the ‘Form of Man’. This creates two questions: Is the man in the physical realm simply a copy of the Form of Man? Or is the man a duplicate of the copy of the copy of the Form of Man? This paradox relinquishes the Theory of Forms as apparently meaningless.…

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s thoughts tended to believe in two levels of reality. Plato held that metaphysics is dualistic: he proposed that there are two different kinds of things - physical and mental. There is what appears real and what is real. Plato believed that everything real takes on a form but doesn't embody that form. on the other hand, Aristotle’s beliefs lead to him seeing only one level of reality. He felt there was only one imminent world and that forms existed within particular things. Aristotle held that form had no separate existence and existed in matter. in nature, we never find matter without form or form without matter. substance is always a composition of form and matter.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle's Final Cause

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay I will begin by extracting the arguments from the extract, outlining Aristotle’s explanation of the four ‘causes’ and arguing why Aristotle has reasons for believing this. In order to achieve a considered and…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The statement argues that Aristotle’s theory of the four causes is impossible to apply to everyday life and cannot be applied to the real world. Aristotle believed there are four causes that determine what things are and their purpose and claims this is how we differentiate one thing from another. These four causes are known as the material cause, the efficient cause, the formal cause and most importantly for Aristotle, the final cause, and these together describe how ‘things’ transform from the state of actuality to potentiality. To some extent the theory of the four causes could be accurate and plausible, however, some of the ideas behind it is flawed and unrealistic. In this essay I will cover the three main faults of Aristotle’s theory. Namely, its lack of clarity, that the theory is based on assumptions and that there is no evidence to support the existence of the prime mover.…

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Aristotle. Aristotle: On the Soul, Parva Naturalla, On Breath. Ed. W. S. Hett. Harvard.: n.p., 1964. Print.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    reality: “the body carries in it a representation of all the most glorious and perfect…

    • 3314 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays