After viewing Episode #9, I agree with Aristotle’s perspective on justice. When I look around at American culture, I do not think our government is fully supporting justice for all. I feel the government is on the right track, however, I do not feel that there is complete justice for all. Correcting injustices, such as giving women the right to vote, education …show more content…
Wearing a head piece does not interfere with one learning in school; it does not affect the primary purpose of school, which is for students to learn. In terms of a Frenchman, the argument is valid because accepting a different culture weakens the original culture. Promoting nationalism sizes up against the argument of a woman’s identification with the following quote from the case study: “The fact that we are losing much of our local culture only makes it more important that we preserve national culture and identity; this, for us, takes precedence over what you call freedom of religion…religion that divides cannot be protected…the veiling of Arab girls is offensive [as it] is the rejection of French culture” (Wolfe, 1999). In other words, religion takes nationalism away from a country and rather discards what the country already has in place for society. If a country’s mission is to increase nationalism, it may not be a violation of rights to deny a woman to wear her veil. Wearing her veil would go against the mission of increasing nationalism in a sense that the veil is promoting something different than the country’s culture. It would, in a sense, be a violation of the country’s rights. If a country’s mission is to promote freedoms, wearing a veil would not violate any rights. For example, “In the States, the schools would be forced to allow the veils as a free exercise of religion” (Wolfe, 1999). It would go against the United States’ mission to not allow