In light of Arthur Andersen's role in the Enron debacle, it is important to note that, no matter what the facts, Arthur Andersen had an obligation to look out for the public interest, to protect the integrity of the free-market system…
Following the collapse of Livent, the company’s independent auditors were criticized for failing to discover that the company’s financial statements had been grossly misstated. Much of this criticism stemmed from the fact that the Livent fraud had features common to several “classic” financial frauds. These features included an extremely aggressive, growth-oriented management team, a history of prior financial reporting…
This paper will define the corporate scandals of the past decade using Enron and their auditors Arthur Andersen as a case study. The paper will focus on the financial statement misrepresentation involving Enron and their auditors. The paper will further define the effects that these scandals…
Arthur Andersen, who used to be one of the “Big Five” largest accounting firms in the…
The growing consultation business created high tension within Andersen’s firm employees. The firm’s consultants began noticing that their wages were less in relation to the market opportunities. They felt their contributions towards profit realization were more than the auditors’ contributions who even had better salaries than them. The auditing partners who were in the managing board of the organization resented that their consulting partners wanted higher profits and shares which they were not ready to address. As a result the consulting partners pulled out of the organization and formed their own consulting firms. This led to the creation of more consulting firms in America and it is the reason as why Andersen’s firm began declining due to increased competitions.…
He came in requesting an evaluation of the company’s accounting records and found usual accounting transgressions. This Houston-based public waste management company then faces a historic restatement of earnings from 1992 to 1997 and this led to further investigation of accounting fraud. At this time, this was the largest corporate restatement in history and one of the most conspicuous executive accounting scandals seen by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). Management had deliberately inflated earnings to meet target margins and deferred current period expenses such as depreciation expense. There were implications that several of the chief accounting officers were previously employed by Arthur Andersen which poses some questions about this connection and the independence of the audit. Andersen would present the company with “Proposed Adjusting Journal Entries” (PAJEs) needed to correct any overstated earnings and understated expenses, however; management often refused to make the necessary changes. This relationship developed into colluded agreement with Andersen to write off accumulated errors found across the 1990s. Top executives had profited tremendously from this scandal at the expense of the shareholders which led to a $457 million class-action suit and Andersen was fined $7 million by the SEC (Ball,…
6. Do you think that the problems at Andersen were unique to them or did they exist at the other big accounting firms? Suppose you were top partner at one of the major accounting firms at that time of Andersen’s demise. What actions, if any, would you take in response? Explain.…
There are several legal and ethical issues surrounding Andersen’s audits of companies accused of improprieties and they center around the fact that Andersen either knowingly failed to report these improprieties…
In October 2001 it was revealed that reported financial condition of Enron Corporation was sustained substantially by institutionalized, systematic, and creatively planned accounting fraud. Enron misrepresented its profits and was accused for a range of shady dealings, including concealing debts so they didn 't record it in the company 's accounts. On December 2, 2001 the Enron Corporation announced about its bankruptcy and dissolution of Arthur Andersen. Additional to the bankruptcy, the company was recognized as the biggest audit failure in American history of audit.…
Assistance! Arthur Andersen assisted Enron in deceiving stakeholders by revealing ways to generate false profits and hide losses through the development of Special Purpose Entities (SPEs). Enron’s consolidated financial statements did not depict or clearly give investors an accurate assessment about the company’s operating and financing activities. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) were not observed nor enforced; Arthur Anderson okayed/ condoned Enron to issue shares “as…
The firm of Arthur Andersen LLP was founded in 1913 by Arthur Andersen and Clarence DeLany and named Andersen, DeLany & Co. The firm later changed its name to Arthur Andersen & Co. in 1918. Arthur Andersen LLP, based in Chicago, Illinois, was one of the “Big Five” accounting firms who perform auditing, tax, and consulting services for large corporations, such as Enron. In 2002, pending the outcome of the Department of Justice prosecution for obstruction of justice, the firm agreed and voluntarily surrendered its licenses and rights to practice auditing and other financial services in the United States. These charges stemmed from the firms handling of the auditing of Enron, an energy corporation, which resulted in the loss of over 85,000 jobs, devaluation of Enron’s stock from over $90 per share to pennies, and the bankruptcy of Enron. When Arthur Andersen was indicted, the firm lost almost all of its clients and faced over 100 civil suits related to its audits of Enron and other companies, such as Sunbeam and WorldCom. Additionally, Arthur Andersen’s reputation was so badly tarnished that no company wanted its name on their audit. In a 2005 Supreme Court ruling, the conviction against Arthur Andersen was unanimously reversed for serious flaws in the jury instructions. Specifically, “in the court's view, the instructions were far too vague to allow a jury to find obstruction of justice had really occurred. The court found that the instructions were worded in such a way…
Arthur Andersen LLP, was an accounting firm with an extensive history. It obtained worldwide growth and opened its first international offices during the 1950 's. Furthermore, in 1979 it surpassed 1,000 partners and became the world 's biggest business services firm. During 1989, it formed a separate consulting practice, from which Andersen Worldwide became the umbrella company for both firms. However, in 1997 Andersen bid for independence and finally in 2000 the split between Arthur Andersen and Andersen Consulting was agreed upon. During 2002 a potential merger with KPMG (another major accounting firm) failed.…
Resource: Case 4.1: Enron Corporation and Andersen, LLP: Analyzing the Fall of Two Giants in Auditing Cases…
Global Crossing is a telecommunications company providing computer networking services worldwide. It was founded in 1997 by Gary Winnick, Abbot L. Brown, David L. Lee and Barry Porter through Pacific Capital Group. It is said that Global Crossing was the first global communications provider with IPv6 natively deployed in both its private and public backbone networks. It raised about $400 million on its initial public stock offering.…
Business ethics is an area of ethics that examines ethical rules and principles within a commercial perspective using cases such as: Accounting Irregularities at WorldCom and Arthur Andersen…No More: What Went Wrong? (Business Ethics 4th Ed: Cases 5 & 6 pg.101-109), both clearly present various moral and ethical problems that arise that are real life business scenarios as well as question the impact of certain ‘special’ duties/obligations that apply to particular individuals and employees who choose to engage in these activities in the organization leading to their downfall. The WorldCom case and scandal occurred because accountants as well as former CEO Bernie Ebbers and Scott Sullivan failed to live the virtues of accountancy as well as failed to adhere to the moral principles and ideals of their profession and further analysis reveals the ways in which these irregular accounting practices were carried out along with the consequences and charges laid by investigators such as conspiracy, fraud and many false claims regarding their accounts and profitability. The Arthur Andersen…No More: What Went Wrong? case is another scenario where a series of unethical accounting practices resulted in the firm’s decline and the role they played in the accounting fraud at Enron. The way in which these corrupt practices took place is an obvious indication of the culture of the organization and the moral standings of employees, close relationships which affected both the company and clients such as Enron.…