Article Analysis: On the Contradictions of the New International Financial Architecture: Another Procrustean Bed for Emerging Markets?
Summary: what is a main concept in the case or article?
The main concept of the article is to explain why the New International Financial Architecture (NIFA) was created and who is being benefited from this approach. The discussion begins with an examination of the power structures of the global political economy by focusing on the continued dominance of the USA. The article presents the contradictory relations between USA and global finance will be explored so as to shed more critical light on the NIFA. This article critically examines the NIFA by linking its institutional components to the larger contradictions of the capitalist inter-state system. A contradiction is the constant promotion of financial liberalization in emerging markets by US-led international financial institutions (IFIs), and the frequency of financial crises in the developing world, on the other. The article suggests that the NIFA is an attempt to stabilize and legitimate the scaffolding of the existing imperative of free capital mobility.
Situations that arise in the case or article.
External debt and domestic financial crises generate substantial social costs. As it happens, poor sectors of society pay a substantial share of the costs of adjustment to debt crises, whereas they benefit rather marginally from financial booms. The experience of many developing countries in several regions of the world also indicates that the social effects of debt crises continue to afflict countries even after several years of successful economic restructuring and recovery. The recent crisis has demonstrated a fundamental problem in the global economy: the enormous discrepancy that exists between an increasingly sophisticated and dynamic international financial world, with rapid globalization of financial portfolios, and the lack of a proper institutional framework to regulate it. In summary, existing institutions are inadequate to deal with financial globalization. This systemic deficiency and the
The main concept of the article is to explain why the New International Financial Architecture (NIFA) was created and who is being benefited from this approach. The discussion begins with an examination of the power structures of the global political economy by focusing on the continued dominance of the USA. The article presents the contradictory relations between USA and global finance will be explored so as to shed more critical light on the NIFA. This article critically examines the NIFA by linking its institutional components to the larger contradictions of the capitalist inter-state system. A contradiction is the constant promotion of financial liberalization in emerging markets by US-led international financial institutions (IFIs), and the frequency of financial crises in the developing world, on the other. The article suggests that the NIFA is an attempt to stabilize and legitimate the scaffolding of the existing imperative of free capital mobility.
Situations that arise in the case or article.
External debt and domestic financial crises generate substantial social costs. As it happens, poor sectors of society pay a substantial share of the costs of adjustment to debt crises, whereas they benefit rather marginally from financial booms. The experience of many developing countries in several regions of the world also indicates that the social effects of debt crises continue to afflict countries even after several years of successful economic restructuring and recovery. The recent crisis has demonstrated a fundamental problem in the global economy: the enormous discrepancy that exists between an increasingly sophisticated and dynamic international financial world, with rapid globalization of financial portfolios, and the lack of a proper institutional framework to regulate it. In summary, existing institutions are inadequate to deal with financial globalization. This systemic deficiency and the