Scholarly articles
In academia, professional scholars typically make unsolicited submissions of their articles to academic journals. Upon receipt of a submitted article manuscript, the journal editor (or editors) determines whether to reject the submission outright or begin the process of peer review. In the latter case, the submission becomes subject to anonymous peer-review by outside scholars of the editor's choosing. The number of these peer reviewers (or "referees") varies according to each journal's editorial practice — typically, no fewer than two, and usually at least three outside peers review the article. The editor(s) uses the reviewers' opinions in determining whether to publish the article, return it to the author(s) for revision, or to reject it. (This process is discussed in the peer review article). Even accepted articles are subjected to further (sometimes considerable) editing by journal editorial staff before they appear in print. Typically, because the process is lengthy, an accepted article will not be published until months after its initial submission, while publication after a period of several years is not unknown.
The peer-review process is considered critical to establishing a reliable body of research and knowledge. Scholars can be expert only in a limited area of their fields; they rely upon peer-reviewed journals to provide reliable, credible research upon which they can build subsequent, related research.
Review articles
Review articles, also called "reviews of progress," are checks on the research published in journals. Some journals are devoted entirely to review articles, others contain a few in each issue, but most do not publish review articles. Such reviews often cover the research from the preceding year, some for longer or shorter terms; some are devoted to specific topics, some to general surveys. Some journals are enumerative, listing all significant articles in a given subject; others are selective, including only what they think worthwhile. Yet others are evaluative, judging the state of progress in the subject field. Some journals are published in series, each covering a complete subject field year, or covering specific fields through several years.
Unlike original research articles, book reviews tend to be solicited submissions, sometimes planned years in advance. Book review authors are paid a few hundred dollars for reviews, because of this; the standard definitions of open access do not require review articles to be open access, though many are so. They are typically relied upon by students beginning a study in a given field, or for current awareness of those already in the field.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
5) What is the evidence that this journal is peer-reviewed? Does the journal have an editorial board? (Look for the journal’s website to discover this information)…
- 439 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Global Finance, Inc. (GFI) is a hypothetical company, which has grown rapidly over the past year. GFI has invested in its network and designed it to be fault tolerant and resilient from any network failures. However, although the company’s financial status has matured and its network has expanded at a rapid pace, its overall network security posture has not kept up with the company growth. The trusted computing base (TCB) internal network within the Global Finance, Inc. Network Diagram hosts the company’s mission critical systems that are vital to the company’s operations that also affect the overall financial situation. The most vital application servers is the company is their Oracle database and email system. GFI cannot afford system or network outages, as its cash flow and financial systems heavily depend on the network stability and availability. GFI has recently experienced multiple network attacks resulting in a total estimated loss at more than $1,000,000.…
- 2659 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
From the vast mass of unsolicited manuscripts, the editor --- the few that might be considered for the publication.…
- 421 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Describe the nature and purpose of a “peer review.” Would peer reviews of Friehling & Horowitz have likely resulted in the discovery of the Madoff fraud? Why or why not?…
- 1261 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
3. Based on this information, explain whether your article for this week was peer reviewed? How can you determine this information?…
- 694 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Peer-reviewed articles appears in an academic journal or periodical in which scholarship relating to a particular discipline is published. Scholars within the field have reviewed these articles prior to publication, thus the name, Peer-Reviewed. Academic journals serve as forums for the introduction and presentation for scrutiny of new research, and the critique of existing research. Content typically takes the form of articles presenting original research, as well as comments or reviews of previous articles/research, and book reviews. Academic or professional publications that are not peer-reviewed are usually referred to as professional magazines.…
- 307 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
A scholarly (peer reviewed) journal/article is a journal/article critiqued or reviewed by peers in a specific field. Peers are defined as colleagues or authorities in the same field. For example, the Journal of Psychology is a scholarly (peer reviewed) journal. Therefore, you can assume that the articles in this journal have been critiqued or reviewed by the top scholars and doctorates in the psychology field. This article review process prior to publication ensures that the articles are of top quality.…
- 570 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
They those basic pieces of data that must be common to all sources, books to articles, from lectures to tweets. What does it mean for a source to be Peer-Reviewed/Refereed/? The process used by publishers and editors of academic or scholarly journals to ensure that the articles people publish meet the accepted standards of their discipline. 10. What does it mean to think and read critically?…
- 693 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A review article is a secondary source that is written about other articles and does not report original research of its own.…
- 6427 Words
- 35 Pages
Powerful Essays -
An academic research constitutes is that is must be approved by an academic quality assessment, before publishing an academic article. It also needs to be revised by referees this process is called peer-reviewing, designed and guarantee an articles academic standard. The following types of academic scholarly research should be looked into such as originality, reviews and theoretical articles. Finally an academic/scholarly article should end in edu and gov.…
- 2482 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Although they were both democratic in nature, the U.S constitution was more realistic than the Articles of Confederation; in terms of having a balanced sense of order and efficiency.…
- 336 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In 1787, a group of representatives from the 13 colonies met all together to discuss the Articles of Confederation’s weaknesses and to make a new Constitution. They disputed, debated, and talked about it for 4 months until they created the U.S. Constitution. In my essay, I will discuss some weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation and I will also discuss how they resolved it. I will also discuss some weaknesses that remained in the Constitution when it was passed.…
- 383 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Authority-5 Although the author Briana Roghlin is deputy editor in chief of Blisstree.com, I haven’t seen any peer review on this specific article. She does have other articles but a lot of them are personal blogs, which can’t be professionally edited. I do give her credit for being a deputy editor in chief because she has some kind of writing experience, but I…
- 693 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Most nursing, medical, science and social science journals meet these criteria. If an article seems like it is too…
- 508 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A literature review is a text written by someone to consider the critical points of current knowledge including substantive findings, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. Literature reviews are secondary sources, and as such, do not report any new or original experimental work. Also, a literature review can be interpreted as a review of an abstract accomplishment.…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays