Preview

Articles of Confederation and Founding Fathers Energy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
581 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Articles of Confederation and Founding Fathers Energy
“The Founding Fathers: A Reform Caucus in Action” by John P. Roche

a. What four factors does the author provide as reason for the success of the Constitutional Convention?

The four factors that Roche provided as reasons for the success of the Constitutional Convention were first George Washington’s involvement. George Washington was considered an American “father figure”, and his reputation was prestigious. Second, the Founding Fathers’ energy, leadership talents, and their communication network were more superior to their opponents. Third, the Founding Fathers’ skills were more effective than their opponents. They dominate and control the discussions. Fourth, the Founding Fathers were nationalists. They tried to maintain democracy which was the purpose of the American Revolution. They were willing to comprise for the better good of the people and country.

b. What about the Founding Fathers is Roche trying to dispel?

Roche tried to dispel the Founding Fathers’ motives behind the framing of the Constitution was not for personal financial gains. He stressed that they wanted to retain democracy for the country which was the main purpose of the American Revolution. He also stressed they were elitists. They were willing to compromise their ideas for the greater good of the country. Roche stated that the Constitution was a compromise between the small and large states.

c. Roche believes that the delegates at the Convention were divided into two groups. What were these two groups and how did they protect their interests in the new Constitution?

Roche believed the delegates at the Convention were divided into two groups – the federalists and the anti-federalists. The federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton. They believed the Constitution should be federalism, and it was good enough.

The anti-federalists were led by Thomas Jefferson. They believed the Constitution alone did not protect the rights of the people. They later added the Bill of Rights to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. Anti-Federalists- Clinton, governor of Jew York, foe of Hamilton. Patrick Henry & Luther Martin of Maryland (lawyer) Constitution was illegal, new government will increase tax, favor “well born” over the common people, put end to individual liberty, eliminate state rights. The purpose of the antis was to not get the constitution ratified. Lacked a bill of rights. Eventually this party failed, constitution got ratified. See federalists.…

    • 3959 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roche's thesis is that the Founding Fathers were essentially good people and that the framing of the constitution was a fairly democratic process that equally addressed state, economical, and political interests. He says that we should give them credit for the great job that they did. The Philadelphia Convention had to work very hard in order to make everyone happy. They had to do their best to achieve political equality for all the citizens while still addressing all the delicate issues necessary. He goes on to say that although the framers themselves were an elite class of people, they still had the interests of the people at heart. They knew that the Articles of Confederation were too weak and a stronger type of government was needed. They also had to keep all of the states happy. In order to get the states to ratify the constitution, they had to do things to keep them all happy. This was especially hard because many things that one state wanted, another was against. Roche argues that their greatest success was convincing the men of the states that change was crucial for the success of the nation. The main assets of the framers in convincing the states were that they had George Washington on their side and that they had many of the greatest intellectuals of the time, including Jefferson and Adams. He also thought that Federalism was vital to the success of the state ratifications. He called Hamilton and Madison "inspired propagandists."I agree with Roche that the framers did have the best interest of the people at heart. They were the smartest men of the time period, and they could see the Articles of Confederation were a failure and that the United States could not last with them. They gathered together and created a document. Although any form of government will have its' flaws, they did their best to create a fair and equal government, whose interest was to protect its' citizens rights. I also agree that the framers had to do some convincing in order to get…

    • 426 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Decision in Philadelphia

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The book Decision in Philadelphia the Constitutional Convention if 1787 by Christopher and James Collier offers a unique look at the scribing of the Constitution and the events that not only surrounded it but led up to its creation. The authors take on the events and their creative writing style make the book and enjoyable and fact filled read on one of the country’s most important events. They begin with a historical look at the events that led up to the signing and a brief synopsis of the events that were occurring in the country at the time. The background that they give provides a good base for the information and allows the reader to see things through the eyes of someone living in the time.…

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Subsequently, Commager states that the convention was assembled and the Constitution created for political motives such as restoring order, strengthening the public credit, enabling commercial treaties and agreements, and providing conditions for trade and commerce to flourish, including the management of the Western lands and the Native Americans. The main problem though was figuring out how to distribute the power among the government. Making the Constitution an “essentially political document” countering Beards declaration of an “essentially an economic document.”…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Roche presents in his essay, the talent apparent in the constitutionalist that met in Philadelphia was superior amongst other groups, which Roche concludes as an advantage. The fundamental need for an ardent group has been a key component of the formation of the United States, acting as the composers of the prosperous future. Roche may consider this formation an advantage due to the authenticity presented, as their reluctance to divert “original” ambitions to pursue an unpremeditated approach of government (Roche 15). The ascendancy they asserted was within reason as the conditions under the Articles and in 1787 presented the need for a convention, likewise promoting the ratification of the Constitution. Of the defects presented in the time…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All 55 delegates, our Founding Fathers were white males, and most of them were wealthy landowners. The delegates agreed that a stronger central government was needed but split on just how far that notion should go.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While the Federalist were in favor of ratifying the Constitution because they wanted a strong central…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    We were to examine our Founder and dig deep into their personal views and trepidations in order to represent them accurately and verbally express their concerns in hopes to help mold the Constitution. The Founder chosen for me was George Read who represented the state of Delaware. Understanding his concerns was not a difficult task, because I too am from Delaware and understand the hardships of growing up in a small state. We had to take into consideration the other states’ views. Some of the larger states had ideologies that differed greatly from those of the smaller states. Objectives of the Southern States contrasted those of the Eastern States. A new national government was the goal of the Convention, but many conflicts arose before a decision and a widely reviewed Constitution could be…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argument Paragraph: The Constitutional Convention was divided into two groups, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The federalists were pushing for a more centralized power or government, and a new constitution. They believed that the Articles…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During this process delegates gathered together to review our nations existing government and what could be modified with our political system to make it stronger. To make our government stronger the delegates had constitutional conventions to create different forms of systems, such as federalism, separation of powers, Congress, Senate, etc., There was also the establishment of Federalists and Republicans, these political groups main priority was to strengthen the economy during Washington’s administration. The Federalists and Alexander Hamilton wanted to create a diverse economy, that was equally balanced by trade, finance, and manufacturing; however, there were others who didn’t agree with Hamilton’s ideas. Republicans like Thomas Jefferson were worried that Hamilton’s plans could possibly contravene the constitution and could possibly give too much power to the federal…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although I was eighty-one years old and in generally poor health, I participated as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia with George Washington presiding. Many of the delegates had widely different ideas about how the country should be organized and run. For instance, I believed that executive power was too great to be placed in the hands of one person and that a committee was a much better option. Alexander Hamilton, on the other end of the argument, wanted a single executive, appointed for life. The convention chose a single executive with a limited term.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty. For the Federalists, Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them. In the ratification debate, the Anti Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. The Anti-Federalists weren't exactly a united group, but instead involved many elements. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. Others argued that a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the despotism of Great Britain they had fought so hard to remove themselves from. And still others feared that the new government threatened their personal…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unitary vs Federal

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The founding fathers wanted to create a constitution because many believed that the national government had to be stronger than what it had been with the use of the Articles of Confederation. At the same time they were fearful of human nature and for people in the position of…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays