Preview

Articles Of Confederation Unsatisfactory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
911 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Articles Of Confederation Unsatisfactory
Federalist Papers- A series of 85 essays written by various authors, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay. These articles were written to persuade the states into ratifying the constitution, saying that it was the best form of government for America.
Shays’ Rebellion- An armed uprising in Massachusetts caused by high taxes that lead to debt. The government took away the farmers farms because they couldn’t pay the taxes, and they rebelled. The Articles of Confederation were too weak to suppress the uprising, and led people to believe they needed to strengthen the federal government.
Articles of Confederation- The government of America as a result of the Revolutionary War. The federal government was harshly restricted, while most of the freedom was given to the
…show more content…

The Articles of Confederation are unsatisfactory because they are too weak, and have no ability to enforce policies. There was is no way to tax, or put down public unrest, and the country is slipping into a deep debt.

What are the concerns of big states and small states?
The small states are concerned that the larger states will overpower them in the government, and they will lose all the power that they previously had. The large states are concerned that if they have the same amount of representation as the small states, then their people will have less representation per person. For example, if every two people in a small state equal twelve people in a large state, then the small states get more representation per person.

What are the concerns of free states and slave states?
The free states are concerned that slavery will spread across America. They are also concerned that if they limit slavery, then the southern states will secede. The slave states are concerned that the free states will unite and abolish slavery. Abolishing slavery will destroy the southerners way of life.

What are the concerns of advocates of stronger and weaker central


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many flaws within it; it made the States more independent but the federal government have very limited control. They weren't allowed to make trade treaties, or allowed to tax which resulted in them not being able to pay their debts. The Constitution was made to tighten up the Articles and set a standard within the States. “ All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” (A-3) This is what caused a change, and tightened up the government. The government had 3 branches now, each with its own responsibilities and neither was more powerful than the other. The legislative had the power to create a new currency…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it provided an outline to how future government should be formed, The Articles of Confederation did not provide America with an effective government from 1781 to 1789. Nicknamed “The Articles of Confusion”, The Articles of Confederation lacked stability and the power to truly govern the states. Under the articles there was no executive branch and no way for the federal government to raise money.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the United States of America won its Independence from Great Britain in 1776 many Americans began to have fidelity to their states instead of their country. Diverse citizens opposed to have an influential government. As a result, to the independent views of Americans the document Articles of Confederation was proposed. It was established with the primary purpose to balance the differences between states. Over time, this document became inadequate to govern itself and protect…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These views maintained continuity from earlier abolitionists like the Society of Friends during the Revolutionary Era. While questioning slavery, the North also took political approach. Knowing that ending slavery altogether was highly unlikely, the northern states still wanted to make sure that southern states did not outnumber them inside Congress. As people migrated into new lands that were gained from the Louisiana Territory, tensions rose higher. They were pretty high when Missouri applied for statehood as a slave state. If Missouri was allowed to enter as a slave state, then the free states would be overpowered in Congress. Maintaining a political balance of power was very important to both the North and the South as neither wanted to be subdue to the views of the other. Political actions were taken during the Missouri Compromise to ensure that slavery did not exceed the 54’ 40” line. This line was put into place to ensure that slavery did not expand northward or westward. In addition, the state of Maine was brought into play the very next year which maintained an equal number of free and slave states. The…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the Articles of Confederation did have some achievements like bringing peace and unity, they were more ineffective than effective for providing a stable government for the United States. The Articles of Confederation were ineffective for these reasons. First, The Articles of Confederation did not allow Congress to impose a tax, so this prevented the new nation of the United States of America to have a strong economic system. Second, The Articles of Confederation prevented the Chief Executive (President) from having any power and thus also having no military. Lastly, The Articles of Confederation didn’t allow the United States to have very good foreign relations with any foreign nation since we were viewed as weak.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, when the topic of limiting the importation of slaves was discussed at the Convention, the representatives from the southern states threatened to leave the union over it. The southerners were fearful that their entire economy and way of life would be destroyed, as they depended on the continuation of slavery for a cheap labor. Alternatively, slavery was largely distasteful to many northerners. Northern parties at the Convention typically understood that it was disadvantageous to them, that slaves would be treated as people in population count for representation purposes, but as untaxed property for import purposes. In the end, both the southerners and the northerners voted with their pocketbook; they were fearful of the financial consequences for their constituents.. A compromise was reached to appease the south, that slave importation would not be limited for the next 20 years. However, to appease the north, Congress would be permitted to levy a duty of $10 per head on each slave that was imported. In reaching this solution, unity was thus preserved, by quelling the parties’ fears over financial…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With drama now rumbling in the American underbellies, the small weight of anything slightly bad could set off a secession bomb. A freesoiler does not want to spread slavery, but he is okay with keeping it in a state it is already in. When the idea of popular sovereignty came about with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A), those freesoilers in office were pushed harder…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We, the South, can’t let this happen. If California and New Mexico both choose to become free states, then there will be an unbalance in Congress. Right now, there is equality between the North and the South. “With slave and free states numbering 15 each, Southerners enjoyed equal representation in the Senate (page 636 of our assigned readings).” If the North takes control of Congress, then all will be lost.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the existence of plantations and the trade of crops, southern states relied heavily on the slave labor. Those states were not in support of freeing the slaves, as their profits and consistency of exportation would eventually plunder. Furthermore, with the northern state delegates not abiding to the South’s proposal,…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were very ineffective because it didn’t give the Federal government enough power, they couldn’t enact tariffs and each state did what was in the best interest of its own state not what was best for the country as a whole. The Articles of Confederation was more of a league of friendship than an actual government. The mere fact that it took four years to ratify should have warned the country of its shortcomings. It was very difficult to amend the Articles because a unanimous vote from each state. Under the Articles of Confederation, there wasn’t even a national currency.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Revolutionary War was over and the Americans had won their independence, the revolutionists and republicans leading the new country were quite convinced that their government should differ from that of Britain and have a limited amount of power. Clearly, these men took these ideals more seriously than they should have. They created a constitution for the 13 states known as the Articles of Confederation, which put the majority of power in the hands of these individual states. They were adopted in 1777 after the war and enacted in 1781. The Articles of Confederation were quite a success pertaining to western lands, but proved unbeneficial for the economy of our new country.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After gaining Independence from England, the Founding Fathers created a form of Government under Articles of Confederation. This was in hopes of creating a Government that was not too powerful. This failed, and a stronger form of Government was needed. The Articles of Confederation had many flaws, and was very weak, causing major problems. This led to creation of the Constitution. In the next few paragraphs, a few weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation will be discussed. Such as how there was no national currency, and Congress had no power to tax. This is as well as two decisions made by the framers that created a stronger Government. These decisions include the creation of one national currency, how Congress was given the power to tax,…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Southern slave states and northern non slave states big states and small states Federalists and Anti Federalists all they needed to compromise come to an agreement on several issues in order to satisfy everyone interest. Federalists wanted a strong central government with control over the states led by Alexander Hamilton. Anti Federalists feared that individual states would lose their freedom under a strong central government led by Thomas…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays