Preview

Ashbury

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
749 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ashbury
Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co Ltd v Riche [(1875) LR 7 HL 653]
Aradhya Choubey
2011/B.A. LL.B./014
-------------------------------------------------
facts
The Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron is a Company incorporated under Companies Act, 1862 and its objects clause stated that the company is established to make and sell, or lend on hire, railway carriages and wagons, and all kinds of rail plant, fittings, machinery and rolling stock; to carry on the business of mechanical engineering and general contractors; to purchase and sell, as merchants, timber, coal, metals and other materials and to buy and sell any such materials on commission or as agents. The Directors agreed to purchase a concession for making railway in Belgium. Later difficulties arose and the shareholders disapproved of what had been done in the matter of the railway, and required the Directors to take over the company’s interest therein and to indemnify the shareholders. The Directors, however on behalf of the shareholders repudiated the contract for the construction of the railway, as being ultra-vires the company and Mr. Riche sued the company for damages for breach of contract.
-------------------------------------------------
Issues
The issues brought before the Court are stated as follows:-
(1) Whether the corporation can enter into a transaction beyond its powers which are conferred by its charter or not?
(2) Whether the contract entered into by the Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co Ltd is ultra vires or not?
(3) Whether the Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co Ltd is entitled to repudiate the contract or not?

------------------------------------------------- Decision with reasons
The House of Lords, after considering the evidence at hand, held that:- (1) Dealing with the object clause in detail, the objects of M/s Ashbury Company, as stated in the Memorandum of Association, were to supply and sell the materials required to construct railways, but not to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

      Company A’s Defense: Impracticability and rights to delegate Company A is responsible for the poor workmanship of Company B BREACH OF CONTRACT  Tom’ Offer???  Assessing Tom’s position  Determining Breach Of Contract  Harry’s Legal…

    • 1103 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bsbwor501 Final Exam

    • 4758 Words
    • 20 Pages

    National Steel, Inc., and Overland Transport Company enter into a contract. Superior Oil Corporation, which will indirectly benefit from the deal, is prevented from having rights under the contract by the principle of…

    • 4758 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the case of Sopov v Kane Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009], the appellant engaged the respondent as contractor in a construction project. The appellant repudiated the contract by wrongly calling on the respondent's bank guarantee, in response to which the respondent terminated the contract and claimed damages for quantum meruit. The Court of Appeal applied the NSW Court of Appeal decision in Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 which provided that an innocent party who accepts a defaulting party's repudiation has the option of claiming either damages for breach of contract, or a quantum meruit for the fair value of work done. The initial contract price was held to be only evidentiary for the…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LP 5.1

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8. What are the general obligations of the seller and buyer in a contract governed by Article 2?…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Assignment 1

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Digger Corporation (“Digger” or “The Company”) has entered a contract with Farmer Company (“Farmer”) which grants the company the right to mine a specific parcel of land for gold for a three-year period. In addition, Digger has also been granted the non-exclusive right to use the access road which is private and currently owned and used by Farmer. Farmer has agreed to maintain the road so that it meets standard conditions of safety and functionality.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dillon V. Champion Jogbra

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Explain what the implied contract was in the case. In this case the implied contract that Champion Jogbra faulted on was the written statements in the employee handbook that were conflicting with at-will…

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Facts:The Defendant on the 29th of May 1879, agreed to grant and the Plaintiff to accept a lease of a mill for seven years at the rent of 30s. a year for each loom run, the Plaintiff not to run less than 540 looms. The lease to contain such stipulations as were inserted in a certain lease of-the 1st of May, which was a lease at a fixed rent made payable in advance, and contained a stipulation that there should at all times be payable in advance on demand one whole year’s rent in a addition to the proportion, if any, of the yearly rent due and unpaid for the period previous to such demand. The Plaintiff was let into possession and paid rent quarterly, not in advance, down to the 1st of January, 1882, inclusive, having run in 1881 560 looms. In March, 1882, the Defendant demanded payment of £1000 14s. 840 as one whole year’s rent for 560 looms at 30s., and £165 as the proportionate part of the rent from the 1st of January last), and put in a. distress. The Plaintiff thereupon commenced his action for damages for illegal distress, for an in- and for specific performance, and moved for an injunction. Fry, J., granted the injunction on the terms of the Plaintiff paying the into Court. The Plaintiff appealed.…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. Provisional Contract to Become Binding on a Future Event (the Incorporation of the Company):…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Derbyshire there has been for well over a hundred years a railway line owned by the defendants. We were told that George Stephenson himself made it. The defendants use it so as to carry limestone from their quarries at Crich down to Ambergate. It is a small gauge line, only three feet, three inches wide, and is 2 1/2 miles long. On that small line there are two tunnels. One of them, with which we are concerned, is only about eight feet or nine feet high, and it is just sixty-six yards long. On 12 February 1953, the plaintiff was walking through the tunnel when she suddenly realised that a train was coming up behind her. She got down on to the ground to seek what safety she could, but unfortunately the train ran over one of her legs and cut it off. She now claims damages against the defendants saying that it was their fault.…

    • 3864 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ultra Vires Doctrine

    • 6975 Words
    • 28 Pages

    The object clause of the Memorandum of the company contains the object for which the company is formed. An act of the company must not be beyond the objects clause, otherwise it will be ultra vires and, therefore, void and cannot be ratified even if all the members wish to ratify it. This is called the doctrine of ultra vires, which has been firmly established in the case of Ashtray Railway Carriage and Iron Company Ltd v. Riche.…

    • 6975 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The object clause of the Memorandum of the company contains the object for which the company is formed. An act of the company must not be beyond the objects clause, otherwise it will be ultra vires and, therefore, void and cannot be ratified even if all the members wish to ratify it. This is called the doctrine of ultra vires, which has been firmly established in the case of Ashtray Railway Carriage and Iron Company Ltd v. Riche. Thus the expression ultra vires means an act beyond the powers. Here the expression ultra vires is used to indicate an act of the company which is beyond the powers conferred on the company by the objects clause of its memorandum. An ultra vires act is void and cannot be ratified even if all the directors wish to ratify it. Sometimes the expression ultra vires is used to describe the situation when the directors of a company have exceeded the powers delegated to them. Where a company exceeds its power as conferred on it by the objects clause of its memorandum, it is not bound by it because it lacks legal capacity to incur responsibility for the action, but when the directors of a company have exceeded the powers delegated to them. This use must be avoided for it is apt to cause confusion between two entirely distinct legal principles. Consequently, here we restrict the meaning of ultra vires objects clause of the company’s memorandum.…

    • 3836 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law of Carriage by Rail

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages

    1) a) Explain how the making of the contract between the consignor and the railway station can exist?…

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Digests on Contracts

    • 7070 Words
    • 29 Pages

    1. Was the Steamship Company liable to Manila Railroad for delivering the boiler in a damaged condition?…

    • 7070 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Articles 1380 1422

    • 4855 Words
    • 21 Pages

    6. Object of the contract must not legally be in the possession of third persons who did not act in bad faith (Art. 1385[2]);…

    • 4855 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whether the contract of employment was made before or after the passing of this Act and whether such contract is expressed or implied, oral or in writing.…

    • 2439 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays