Since they were carved into stone he could not go back on his word as they were written on a piece of paper in the castle. The edicts were placed all around the kingdom so that everyone could see them (Doc D). If some was convicted and sentenced to death they would be a load to see their family and to make things that were wrong, right (Doc D). In edict F it is said that there would be officer sent out every five years to inspection what was happening around his kingdom (HAW edict F). Those are some of the reason that he was an Enlightened ruler. So Asoka was not a ruthless ruler, but an Enlightened ruler. Although some may thing that he was a ruthless ruler by killing 200,000 people in Kalinga, he was doing it for his own people and he also let 150,00 leave the area. Which that is only 50,000 people under how many he killed, so he let go about the same amount that he killed. He also felt bad after that battle because of the amount of the dead/wounded and end the ways of wars and turn into a Buddhist. That is why Asoka was not a ruthless ruler, but an Enlightened ruler. So what do you think about Asoka now, was he a bad or good
Since they were carved into stone he could not go back on his word as they were written on a piece of paper in the castle. The edicts were placed all around the kingdom so that everyone could see them (Doc D). If some was convicted and sentenced to death they would be a load to see their family and to make things that were wrong, right (Doc D). In edict F it is said that there would be officer sent out every five years to inspection what was happening around his kingdom (HAW edict F). Those are some of the reason that he was an Enlightened ruler. So Asoka was not a ruthless ruler, but an Enlightened ruler. Although some may thing that he was a ruthless ruler by killing 200,000 people in Kalinga, he was doing it for his own people and he also let 150,00 leave the area. Which that is only 50,000 people under how many he killed, so he let go about the same amount that he killed. He also felt bad after that battle because of the amount of the dead/wounded and end the ways of wars and turn into a Buddhist. That is why Asoka was not a ruthless ruler, but an Enlightened ruler. So what do you think about Asoka now, was he a bad or good