Preview

Assess The Difference Between Democracy And Fascism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1622 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess The Difference Between Democracy And Fascism
Compared to other political forms, democratic government is the fairest and just way to govern the citizens within a society. This can be showcased through the differences between fascism, and democracy, an example being Hitler’s fascist Germany back in 1933, compared to modern democracies of today. Democracy advocates and protects all individuals within a society, the same cannot be said for fascism societies, where elitism and hatred are ingrained within the ideology. Within the Third Reich, Hitler implemented the Nuremberg Laws to oppress Jews within Germany during that time, forcing them to wear the Star of David to showcase that they were of Jewish descent, and putting them into ghettos; this alienated the Jewish people of Germany. …show more content…
Democracy prevents such tragedies from occurring from laws such as the consent of the governed, allowing citizens to kick voted government elected officials out of power. People within democracies are imprisoned for hate crimes, proving that genocide cannot occur with proper laws enforced, and consent of the governed. These examples show and prove that democracy should be fully embraced as it protects the well-being of all in society, not just an elite few. Democracy does not allow for indoctrination of people, as many views are expressed within a democracy, a totalitarian leader is not the only source of information. Although fascists are voted into power they destroy a once democratic state from the inside; such as, when Hitler combined both the office of Chancellor and President into one, making himself into an all-powerful dictator, and taking away people’s rights. There are checks and balances within a democracy that makes it so people are not taken of their rights. All in all, democracy shows to be the better system for the life of the citizens within the state, as they have individual rights and freedoms, the ability to choose who is in office, and do not have to worry about being sent away to death camps simply for their …show more content…
Communism is not a legitimate form of government, as these governments are not voted into power, they overthrow the current government system through revolution, and often it does not represent the vast will of the people. Democracy counters this, as elected government officials represent the will of the people, and serve their interests within their respective legislative, or executive branches. These elected representatives are held to the consent of the governed making them accountable for their actions; this is not the case for Communism in Stalin’s Soviet Union, as he was not voted into office; therefore, he is not accountable to anyone for his actions. Communism in the USSR was an oppressive form of political power, with Stalin being a totalitarian leader, he forced his citizens into grueling work camps and struck fear into their hearts through his KGB, the secret police. The work camps in Soviet Russia at the time propelled the USSR’s economy from being that of a mainly agricultural state to becoming an industrialized state. This was achieved by taking away people’s rights and forcing them into the camps. He implemented five year plans to reach the same industrial status as western democracies with capitalism. Stalin claimed to be for the worker’s rights however, this was not what actually occurred. Stalin and the communist party set goals for production, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph Stalin established a modern totalitarian government in Soviet Russia. He is known as the “Man of Steel”. A totalitarianism is a type of government that takes total, centralized, state control over every aspect of public and private life of their people. His rule had changed the people of his empire in numerous ways. Stalin had total control over economic needs. According to document 6 “By 1940 Russia produced more pig iron than Germany, and far more than Britain or France. Numbers of cattle grew in the 1920s, but fell increasingly during the collectivization of agriculture after 1929, and by 1940 hardly exceeded the figure for 1920. Since 1940 the industrial development of the Soviet Union has been impressive, but agricultural production has continued to be plumiding”. The document illustrates how pig iron had significantly increased as a result of the “Five Year Plan”, however heavy industry led to expense of food supplies. This would cause limited production of consumer goods. It caused a step back because of the severe shortages of housing, food, clothing as well as other necessary goods. The Five Year Plan didn’t help much to excel their economic as Stalin hoped, it impacted by creating famine. Stalin rising to power promised an economic boom for Russia however, in that process many people suffered and died of starvation. According to document 5, “The purge began its last,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought many changes to the Soviet Union. Stalin’s goal was to transform the Soviet Union into a modern superpower and spread communism throughout the world, and he was determined to sabotage anyone who stood in his way. He used many methods such as collectivization, totalitarianism and five year plan’s to achieve his goals. Stalin’s rule brought both harmful and beneficial consequences to the Soviet Union; however, the negative factors were so terrible, that they overwhelm the positive factors.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Importantly, democracy supposedly serves to check unaccountable power and manipulation by the few at the expense of the many, because fundamentally democracy is seen as a form of governance by the people, for the people. This is often implemented through elected representatives, which therefore requires free, transparent, and fair elections, in order to achieve legitimacy.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Democracy is a complicated concept. It is not just a structure of government, or electoral politics, democracy is “politics with purpose” (Oakes, pg. 491). The people should have input on how their government is run and their rights of “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness” should be protected by the…

    • 3373 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leaders after World War I

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Joseph Stalin brought all economic activity under government control. The government owned all businesses and distributed all resources. Wages were low and workers were forbidden to strike. He also brought agriculture under government control where the state set all prices and controlled access to farm supplies. Stalin’s Communist party used the secret police torture, and violent purges to ensure obedience. Citizens knew what would happen if they were disloyal. He used propaganda to elevate the communist system by making him a godlike figure. The government censored the press and decided which books where published. If the book violated government expectations the writer was put to trial.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy as a political system first emerged in ancient Greece and Rome. It encourages the participation of citizens in the election of their representatives in government. Democratic countries also observe human rights. In most democratic countries, power is balanced between various arms of government in order to promote checks and balances. In addition, many of these countries have a constitution that they adhere to.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In a true democratic society, it is essential to ensure a government that follows the will of the people and not the one that force the people to follow it, that is, a “government of the people, by the people, and for the people” as said by Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg address which lasted a little over two minutes on November, 19, 1863. Democracy is not government of some people by some people and for some people as a frequent practise in some developing nations. Democracy is a nation ruled by its citizenry. The beauty of democracy is that the minority will have their say but the majority will have their way. Functioning democracy implies where the people approve to the government operating the nation. All eligible voters are given chance to select their leader through their right to vote and to be voted for. In a truly democratic society, the representative or candidate who have been elected are liable in many ways to the people who voted and elected them. They have to implement those pledges made during elections with much transparency, accountability and good governance.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy vs. Absolutism

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Democracy made a government that is strong and ready to protect the people’s natural rights. “To protect natural rights governments are established” (doc.5). The government has power to make laws, protect the rights and give people there freedom. Sometime the government has the right to take away our natural rights or make new laws. The government would have to be careful for whom they give power to; if they give power to an Absolute Monarch he can take complete control over our whole government.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ism Examples

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Firstly a democratic government is a government in which the people get to vote. If the voting is not rigged then the government will not be as enforcing or powerful, people could choose what laws the government should enforce if they can get 50% of the populations votes. On the other hand a totalitarian government gives no power the the citizens of their country. This can cause the killings of millions of citizens. Secondly in a democracy you have your favorite candidate elected into office.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By turning the Soviet Union into a totalitarian state, they became an industrial power. Stalin came into power and made a positive impact at the perfect time after Lenin died. He was what the nation needed in order to boost their economy and keep up with the other modernizing countries in the world. Although not everybody in the Soviet Union benefited from Stalin’s strict rule, he helped the industrial aspect of life by making a positive impact on the economy. When the Soviet Union needed someone to step up to the plate at the time of a past leader’s death, Stalin took charge to help the…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Now with democracy it equals the power so know body has too much power. So now there is a need for wars, laws, and human rights have to be agreed on by groups of people and not one person. This gives people the feeling that they get their word out,…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    absolutism and democracy

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Democracy is when the people vote for who’s in charge. A man doesn’t vote to get their properties of privileges taken away, so they put their trust in the new government system that’s supposed to make the power of men more equal. If a person in power were to take over someone’s free will said person probably wouldn’t want to listen or follow that person. A ruler wants their people to like and respect them, not dislike them and wish them out of power, this causes the ruler to try to please every party.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy is a system in which people decide matters as a group; people have the right to do as they want and vote. When making the laws in this government citizens make the decisions and to a certain extent the government follows. One country that has a successful Democracy is America, because of it’s economy and the different ways that make the people feel safe. For example,…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    over their country, or cause damage to its economy or society for a long period of time3. Democracy also allows for every individual over a certain age, if they choose to, the chance to have 'a say ' in the government that is in power. This is normally carried out via numerical voting systems where each individual is given the count of one vote. Democracies also allow competing parties to…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Non-Democratic Countries

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In non-democratic countries people are not participating in political process and they were restricted by central body. The government has absolute powers over its citizens and nobody have a right to freely participate in election, decision making process and so on. The government dominated everything and every activity within the territory of its sovereignty. Furthermore, the government has an authority to practice some policy to mobilize people for particular purposes like demonstrating against some countries or the activity of opposition parties or to show off that their government is representing their dignity and choices (Allen, 2002). But in no democratic regimes people are not self-governing and human rights and individual freedom is under threatened. The government and leaders are repressing minority groups, opposition parties and create inequality among their citizens. Besides, head of the government has a complete power to make any decision and law. Free media, newspaper and organizational activity are prohibited, also markets and economy is dominated by the government. But, in non-democratic regimes the government makes disparity among its citizens, maybe support certain people or social class and serve them, simultaneously neglect others. Alternatively, there is a weak rule of law and doesn’t play a vital role and undermined by the oppressive government. Moreover, the government may pass a law or procedure that doesn’t reflect people’s interest like Kurdistan when parliament passed a law of polygamy without asking people which was not in favor of women (Ahewar, 2008), but they tolerated under the pressure of religious…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays