Preview

Assess The Impact Of Peaceful Resistance On A Free Society.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
800 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess The Impact Of Peaceful Resistance On A Free Society.
Dennis Rattunde A Lesson in Peaceful Resistance Government is one of the most discussed topics found on the Earth. This is because government controls how the population will live its daily life. However, it is up to the population to agree or disagree with the government’s style of rule. Most often when such issues come to question some kind of movement that is designed to be peaceful comes into play. Although originally peaceful, it is hard to predict what kinds of effects such movements may have on society. After investigation however it can be said that peaceful resistance positively and negatively impacts a free society as demonstrated by Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and John Brown. Gandhi positively impacted a free society through …show more content…
In his home country of India Gandhi also inspired peaceful resistance towards British rule which eventually brought about Indian independence. However the path towards such independence was littered with violence as some rebels would take the path of violence rather than non-violence. This caused for only “disobedience” instead of “civil disobedience” so that Gandhi’s peaceful resistance may have begun independence, but it also began violent struggles against the government as well as religion later on (Costly). Although the armed rebellions followed the Jainism path of “self-help”, they did not respect that every human contains a soul to be respected (“Jainism”), and even though Gandhi did not support such actions, his civil disobedience did inspire them so that he had both positive and negative impacts on society. Inspired by Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr. also impacted the free society both positively and negatively. King believed that “there are just and there are unjust laws” (“Martin Luther King Jr.”) and that such unjust laws should be …show more content…
The determination that was expressed in King’s peaceful resistance eventually did lead to the desegregation of the United States. However King also inspired violence (similar to Gandhi) in that the marches would come to “disobedience” at times. For example during the marches in Alabama (which were peaceful at first) the populace came to violence through police instigation on occasions such as “Bloody Sunday” (“Selma to Montgomery March”). These instances show that although beginning with non-violent intentions King’s “civil disobedience” did have negative impacts, however over all it had the positive effect of repealing segregation in the states. Lastly and the least recent of all, John Brown used peaceful resistance to impact society both negatively as well as positively. Brown continually throughout his life was helping African-American families to survive and live a thorough life. Brown did so by donating land, participating in the Underground Railroad, as well as raising an African-American child (“John

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It depends on certain situations whether peaceful resistance to laws can have a positive impact or have a negative impact on a free society. Majority of peaceful assemblies can give the group of activist their freedom of speech and views towards something they believe in. Famous public figures like Claudette Colvin and Rosa Park's civil disobedience had a powerful effect on the world. Rosa Parks was arrested for refusing to move her seat for a white men while sitting on a segregated white bus in Montgomery, Alabama on December 1st, 1955. Similarly, Claudette Colvin found herself in the same predicament and she was declared the first woman to have that sort of refusal or peaceful resistance towards bus regulations back then. Even though they both knew their views were going to get them into serious consequences with the Jim Crow Laws, they spoke their views and truths about the world during that time. In Rosa Park's situation, fortunately her civil disobedience was a "peaceful resistance towards the law." Nothing seriously got out of control, too violent, or too extreme and to foreshadow when it did; the people of the African American community just stood back up and refused to let the world shut…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, King talks about the difference between unjust and just laws. He tells us that everyone has a moral code to adhere to with accordance the laws that are just. Yet, the laws that are seen as unjust, should be unfollowed by the people. According to King, just law is a moral law or the law of God, whereas unjust law is made up by humans and does not have anything common with eternal and natural law. MLK would advise the people to disobey this act in any way possible, an unjust law is not one that should be followed. MLK was very adamant about this, the laws that are unfair to the people are meant to be disobeyed in order to hopefully change…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., in his “Letter to Birmingham Jail”, argues that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. King’s purpose is to explain how a just law should be followed, and how unjust laws, such as segregation, should not. He supports this claim by appealing to logos, ethos, and pathos.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He inspired from the Pulpit people of color in one demonstration that lasted 370 days were people of color walked for the right for a seat on a bus. He spoke with such clarity on what needed to be done in this country. He was able to lead thousands of non violent demonstrators from Selma, Alabama to the steps of the capitol in Montgomery,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it is exercising the rights of it’s citizens as well as proving that the government is not always correct, and the biggest changes normally come about from civil disobedience. Civil disobedience has been used to speak against the United States government when it showed that those in power wouldn’t change for the better. Civil disobedience was not well known for the abolition of slaves. David Thoreau called for it in “Civil Disobedience,” written in 1849, claiming that the government showed faulty in handling slavery. Thoreau claimed “the government itself… is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it,” (Thoreau par 1).…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Instead of working with others and being peaceful he used violence to get what he wanted. He created the Black Panthers which was a violent group back in the 60s. Even though he accomplished some good things, like getting tons of African Americans in the north to go vote he did this in the wrong way. He caused many riots and injuries of others which eventually led to his death when a member of his own group shot and killed him.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi employed a campaign of peaceful resistance in the first half of the twentieth so that India could be independent from Great Britain and possess institutions that protected the rights of Indians. Some years later, American civil rights organizations continued this approach, organizing sit-ins and marches to force governments to change policies that discriminated against African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote that civil disobedience,“seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue”. It uses the power of the people to force institutional action. Civil disobedience tactics can be just as effective today, just look at Cedric Herrou a French farmer who illegally transported African migrants into France for humanitarian reasons.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mohandas Gandhi exhibited this during India’s independence movement. Gandhi held non-violent protests to fight for India’s independence. By protesting, Gandi displayed disobedience towards the British to earn rights for himself and others. He was able to peacefully achieve his goal of independence for India. Gandhi proved that disobedience allows people to create change that may not happen by following rules. People may argue that disobedience is injurious because it creates a rude, harmful society of people. This conjecture is incorrect because as Gandhi established, disobedience can be peaceful. Gandhi and all of his supporters were able to disobey while remaining non-violent to receive their rights from the British. Disobedience helps people improve their society and causes minimal harm, making it an exceedingly valuable human…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States, in simple terms, was built upon a group of people who wanted change. These people knew that if they did not act, then they would not receive the change that was needed. When asked if peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society we must look at the past for an answer. And as the United States of America our history shows that peaceful protest positively impacts a free society. In the years of 1954-1968 African-Americans peacefully fought for the end of segregation and various forms of oppression, including race-inspired violence. Laws barred them from classrooms, bathrooms, theaters, and train cars that were used by "whites." Leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr. peacefully fought for freedom by speaking out to the public that all…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi used non-violent tactics to free British rule in India. Martin Luther King Jr. mostly used…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance is a farce. A mirage of niceness changing something. To say it has a neutral impact is as positive as it can go, and the impact is,…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance, historically referred to as “civil disobedience”, is a long-standing American tradition practiced throughout history in times of public turmoil and political fracas. From the opening stages of the United States, to the tergiversate of the civil right movement, civil disobedience continues to take its place in the moral actions of the American people. The right to defend one's unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is an ideal that was both important to the Founding Fathers, and to Americans today. Influential leaders of the world such as John Dickinson, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Luther King Jr., along with many others, promoted and demonstrated the benefits and positive affects of peaceful protesting to achieve their goals, as well as establish a legacy and a path for revolution. Likewise, a peaceful…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. is known for his work in desegregation and the end of of the most well known racial equality activists ever, and he lived during a period of time that had many unjust laws that created many problems for African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. agreed with St. Augustine that a law that is unjust is actually not a law after all. Martin Luther King Jr.’s belief in this idea was seen in his letter from a Birmingham Jail when he says, “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” Martin Luther King Jr. mentioned multiple times in his letter that these unjust laws were extremely degrading, and denied African Americans basic human…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Resistance has had a major impact in our society as it has lead to revolutions and laws to help establish more freedoms and fairness. For instance, during the 1880’s the Jim Crow Laws were enforced to segregate African Americans…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non Violent Revolutions

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Violence against violence is only the most logical way to expel overpowering executives. Government has used brutality to keep their citizens “in check” since the beginning of time. Violence is natural to humans. Humanity has always known this concept of cruelty and it is impossible to avoid. Karl Peter Heinzen was a notable author who wrote a pamphlet advocating violent revolutions. The pamphlet emphasized the use of violence to allow change in government. Avoiding the use of cruelty and barbarity will result in avoiding a future where real change is enabled everywhere in society (Heinzen 10). The reality is humanity is shaped by brute force. By avoiding violence, the citizens are avoiding a different and better future. Violent revolutions should be considered legitimate because totalitarian governments are allowed to get away with “legal” murder everyday. The inhabitants are just guarding themselves from the ferocious regimes. Karl Heinzen’s pamphlet also argues the legitimacy of violent revolutions. “It was my object to vindicate not only the aims of revolution, but also its means, including assassination and to render it as legitimate as the tyrants have done with their murder by war, their ‘legal’ murder, their murder by ‘court-martial’” (Heinzen 12). Violent governments have always used “legal” murder to control their citizens. The…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays