Social class background has a powerful influence on a child's chances of success in the educational system, a child is often labeled from the first year of school based on stereotyped assumptions about their class background, in the society there are significant social class, gender and ethnic inequalities of educational achievement. Differences in cultural and material circumstances operating outside the school environment and processes that take place between working class and middle class students within the schools themselves which involve negative and positive labeling.…
According to Bynner and Joshi (1999) class differences have persisted since the late 1950’s. It can be seen that all studies carried out by various theorist came to the same conclusion that middle class pupils tend to do a lot better than working class in terms of educational achievement. Pupils from middle class backgrounds tend to pass more exams, stay on at school for longer and are five times more likely to go to university. This gap in achievement widens with age as right from nursery school to university, processes like labelling or the self fulfilling prophecy take place which insure that the working class are always at a disadvantage.…
It is apparent that most of the studies carried out by numerous sociologist came to the same assumption that middle class pupils tend to do alot better than working class in terms of educational achievement. Pupils from middle class backgrounds tend to pass more academic exams, stay on for further education and are more likely to make it into university. This gap in achievement widens with age as right from little school to university, processes such as labelling and the self fulfilling prophecy take place which means the working class are always at disadvantage. Labelling is a process within schools where teachers attach a meaning to the pupil for example middle classes are labelled as the ideal pupils however this in itself acts a stereotype as it assumes all middle class fits the description of the perfect pupil but this can be a positive or negative label as those labelled negatively may aim to prove the person wrong as said in Item A. The whole idea of the self fulfilling prophecy takes the process of labelling further as based on the label the teachers make prediction about pupils which usually come true simply by the fact that they were made. The reason it relates with labelling is that it changes the pupils self image by bringing it in line with the expectation others expect him or her to fulfil.…
Although cultural deprivation plays a huge part in how well working class children achieve compared to middle class children, there are also other factors involved. Both material deprivation and culture capital affect a child’s educational achievements.…
The claim that social class differences in education through school factors is supported by the interactionists such as George H. Mead. They believe that labelling theory encourages the educational achievement in different social classes. The labelling theory is when the teacher identifies major characteristics of a student. Research shows that teachers are more likely to label middle class children as 'bright and well behaved' but working class children as 'naughty and disruptive'. Following the label being attached on the child is self fulfilling prophecy, this is when the child will respond and act according to the label being placed on them, so a middle class student will act well behaved and complete the work that is set whereas the working class student will disrupt and not complete the work set and therefore not do well in exams. This shows that labelling working and middle class students affects the educational achievements because of their social class.…
Cultural deprivation theorists, such as Douglas (1964) argued that working class parents offer less encouragement and support towards their children's education. However, others such as Tizard (1981) argue that the apparent lack of interest of working class parents may mask their lack of confidence or knowledge in dealing with schools. Nonetheless, theorists believed that there are three major factors that are responsible for working-class under-achievement: a lack of intellectual stimulation, the restricted speech code and working-class subcultures.…
Access how factors within educational policies in Britain cause educational underachievement for the working class subculture.…
“Discuss how far sociologists’ would agree that working class students underachieve in the education system is due to labeling processes that happen in school?”…
A social class background has a very powerful influence on a child’s chances of success in the education system. The children that are from a middle class background will normally perform better than the working class.…
Most parents in working class schools don’t have the best jobs, they don’t have the best income, and they don’t have the best school systems to send their children to. Anyon found that kids in the working class schools, some programs were different than others. One school would go into depth about a certain topic, and another would barely touch on the topic and the teacher would make no effort to try and help the students. The teachers wouldn’t let the children out when the bell rang, keeping them after class to continue the work so the teachers could socialize. In working class schools, Anyon says that the teachers care more about themselves than their students.…
Middle class children have a higher tendency of achieving more than pupils of the working class. A few explanations pay attention on the external factors outside school. This includes cultural deprivation – working class pupils are portrayed as having a lack of correct attitude, values, language and knowledge for educational success. Whilst material deprivation means that working class pupils are most likely to have poorer diets, health and housing and their parents are less able to meet the hidden costs of schooling. The middle class have mote cultural capital – they have a better advantage of their choices within the marketised education system.…
| This sociologist argues that the values and beliefs of lower class subcultures are self imposed barriers to educational career and success. The lower class believe they have less oppourtunity for induvial achievement.…
One way the working class identities can be considered to be negatively created and reinforced through the education system as for example, some working class pupils will the formal curriculum. Wills (1977) found that the working class ‘lads’ were not interested in school or qualifications because they had their minds set on factory jobs. However, this did not mean they truanted from school. The lads actually enjoyed going to school because they could have a laugh at the expense of teachers and conforming students. This shows that Education does little to reinforce the identities of the work class as traditionally working class men went into manual work which required little qualifications.…
Outline some of the ways in which material deprivation may affect educational achievement. (12 marks)…
Education is a major component of social class since it has affect on both higher and lower social classes. Individuals from higher social classes are more likely to attend better schools and more likely to receive higher education. Educational inequality is one factor that perpetuates the class divide across generations. These social domains directly impacts on what and how much children learn. Children growing up in low-income neighborhoods, for example, are much more likely to experience constant stress which may have an effect on their minds, cognitive skills and abilities. “The disparities between rich and poor families and neighborhoods have increased, exacerbating the differences between schools and widening the gap in opportunities.” (Stephens and Marcus 5)…