Preview

Assignment 2: Case Separating Church And State

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
350 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assignment 2: Case Separating Church And State
Case Separating Church and State
Name
Professor
Institution
Course
Date
Supreme Court to hear case separating church and state
By David Savage
LA Times
Introduction
Justices are set on Wednesday to hear and determine whether to allow city councils begin their meetings with explicitly Christian prayers. The main bone of contention is to whether at the beginning of a meeting, prayers should be invoked or not.
American United for Separation of Church and State are of the view that, prayer practice conducted before meetings can be viewed as an act of endorsing certain religions over the others. This In turn might lead to religious discrimination, which might bear decisive effects. In a 1983 decision that upheld the invocations

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    However, society stills considers this a contentious debate that shows this is still a sensitive topic among religious and non-religious Americans. Armstrong Williams writes in his article “We Need More Prayer”, “A few moments of prayer in schools seems a small thing - harmless enough, almost to the point of insignificance. Yet it has provoked an impassioned firestorm of debate about the dangers of imposing viewpoints…” Prayers is school may be innocent enough but it can and does marginal religious minorities. These debates being had throughout the country on the topic of religious prayers in public schools is an issue that almost certain will end in a stalemate. There are far too many voices that are being heard regarding this issue and none seems to be willing to compromise. But this is a good thing. People can agree to disagree and this is good for the country. Expression and speech are two great rights we have as US citizens and we have the right even compelled to use said rights. However the Government is not made up of one individual who has one voice and speaks for all. It is made up of many people with many voices that speak for everyone. Religious prayer simply cannot exist in schools because there are too many religions. It has too many voices of faith and faiths which hosts many different deities. Government and areas of public learning should just…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As the student is giving the prayer there is no open forum as would be the case during public speeches. Without this in place, prayers before sporting events are not considered to be public speeches but are considered to be sponsored by the school. The new policy the school had to elect students to be the spokespersons to deliver the prayers was also criticized, leading the justices to believe the school was still controlling the process. The Court found the voting process that was used by the district of voting for if the prayer would be given at an event and who would give the prayer also caused rival political factions between different religion groups at the school. The voting process would create a majority win over the different religions within the district and that would be the religious voice that all would hear. The policy the district has fails to protect the rights of the minority of students. All the factors resulted in the policy of the district to be…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 6–3 decision of the majority was delivered by Justice Steven. For his majority opinion, the Alabama law "silence meditation or voluntary prayer" was unconstitutional. He found that was just to promote religion. He also found the implication of the words "voluntary prayer" as an issue of the Alabama law. The Justice Steven just focused on the purpose behind the law. The word "voluntary prayer" is not a protecting the student 's right but it encourage them to voluntary to prayer. One of the Judge also agree with his decision, Judge W.Brevard Hand, ruled prayer decisions in public school were wrong because this law is not apply to the states. As many states, they want to have the same decision and to make the world more successful. They both agree with Wallace v. Jaffree that use instructional times for silent school prayer and in public school are wrong. But with that decision, Justice William Rehnquist disagreed with them. He declared and endorses prayer in public school, even the religious in this situation. In addition, The District Court permitted the prayers to continue, because they ultimately held that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment does not prohibit a state from establishing a religion. ("Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)"). But the Court of Appeals ruled that they were unconstitutional, because the court had considered and had rejected the historical arguments. Because of that, the state appealed to the Supreme Court. When the law appealed to the Supreme Court, the Former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart noted that they did it as the establishment of a religion of secularism. Also, after many decision, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren has angered southern conservatives that as many reason they made even more resentment that lead to many problem. Some people of Christian thought it would be good if the prayers at school. But the Supreme Court still…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ps/537-544 Chapter 4

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    16. Why was it decided that the Ten Commandments displayed at the Texas State Capitol were acceptable?…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The education of the nation’s youth has always been a contentious issue. One of the largest issues facing the education system is the integration of sectarian religions such as prayers into the classroom and other extensions of the education system. In the mid to late 1900s, several court cases went before the Supreme Court involving various aspects of state sponsored prayers. The two major cases involving prayers in schools were Engel v. Vitale and Abington v. Schempp. Within these two cases, the Court successfully and diligently balanced the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause and paved the way for the Lemon Test and Endorsement Test.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Case Study

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The second question of the case is whether or not the reading of the prayer violates the Establishment Clause. The Establishment Clause prohibits laws that respect an establishment of religion by congress. Some parents argued that by having the students and teachers recite the prayer, the public was showing that the government was “respecting an establishment of religion”.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hutson, James H. Church and State in America: The First Two Centuries. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.…

    • 591 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: UPI. (2013) U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear religious expression case. United Press International. Retrieved from: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/05/20/US-Supreme-Court-agrees-to-hear-religious-expression-case/UPI-85351369070510/#ixzz2Zvkck3SJ…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Engel and four other parents -- two Jews, an atheist, a Unitarian, and another Protestant -- complained that the prayer was "contrary to the beliefs, religions, or religious practices of both themselves and their children." (Religion in public schools: Engel v. Vitale) After the five parents discussed this topic they came up with a case, and at the end found victory. ” The duty to uphold the Constitution is a fundamental difference between public schools and religious schools.” (Religion and Public Schools).…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout American history, religion has often been entangled with sports.1 This is evidenced by athletes thanking God in interviews and praying after scoring touchdowns in football games.2 Moreover, pregame prayers are often held before sporting events throughout the country.3 These rituals are often undertaken without thoughts of consequences because they are commonplace and because schools may not have received complaints about them. However, religious rituals conducted at public institutions have been increasingly challenged by individuals claiming that the rituals violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.4…

    • 4275 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ackerman, David M., and Kimberly D. Jones. The Law of Church and State in the Supreme…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fact Pattern

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Speak had issue with is the optional weekly breakfast that President Smacksem would put on for the faculty. The majority of this action is protected by the Constitution. One of the larger issues that Dr. Speak had with this is that the breakfast ends with a Judeo-Christian prayer. Yet the Supreme Court Case of Marsh v. Chambers (1983) is approving of prayer at the end of a state meeting, just as Congress has approved this action. This is not seen as a religious act, but an acknowledgment of beliefs. In addition to Marsh, Greece v. Galloway (2014) helps President Smacksem’s case because Greece ruled that it is unconstitutional to force someone to say a prayer of another religion. Because of that, Dr. Speak cannot press charges on the fact that she asked, and denied, that President Smacksem say a Native American prayer. This does present one of the issues associated with freedom of religion: that you cannot deny someone from practicing something, you cannot favor one religion over another, yet you cannot force someone to acknowledge or say a prayer if they do not want to. If she had an issue with the meeting being held in general, her argument would also fall flat due to the ruling in Board of Education v. Mergens (1990) that ruled that if a school denied a religious program then they would have to deny all programs, and vice versa. Since there is no indication that President Smacksem is denying other religious meetings from being held than we must…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue was whether school sponsored nondenominational prayer in public schools violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the earliest modern liberals was John Locke, who in 1690 published Two Treatises following the conclusion of a major, and Locke would think senseless, religious sectarian war between Catholics and Protestants. In his manuscript where he introduced the concept of natural law and argues that faith and government have no business mixing, Locke contends that government should remain small enough not to trample on people’s liberties while offering protection under the law and safeguarding people’s personal rights. Among these rights is the right of freedom of religion. Locke had great foresight; he could see that the religious sectarian strife unfolding in England could spill over again anytime, and so he proposed his concept of separation of church and state because he knew that personal liberties would be much safer in an England without a state religion than with a state religion.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prayer in School

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wallace v. Jaffree, (1985) -- This case dealt with a state’s statute requiring a moment of silence in public schools. The Court ruled that this was unconstitutional where legislative record revealed that motivation for the…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays