I feel like my figures do meet publication standards. I feel like the information is easy to read on the graph, and that the caption captures all that is required for a view who just saw the graph to understand. I did not know either or not to say the numbers were the log numbers of the one from Table 11.1, so I decided to add that they were the log numbers just to be safe.
b)
For my answer for question two I feel like it clearly declares why these islands were different. Explaining ach category, paring the islands up to show where they are different from the rest of the islands they are like each other.
c)
I feel like I understand the tropic cascade with a well-done image and figure caption. I feel like I understood Figure 22.14 and
why the islands with higher immigrations rates would be affected the most, than the ones with lower immigration rates. I feel like I understood the assigned reading enough to clearly answer part c, on what I expect to happen in 5 years, and how I think the landscapes would change.