Yes you can safely say there is a little green man called Jeff who rules your life too, that’s because you are a new atheist isn’t it.
Now what you must understand is when debating with me I do not take atheistic statements as statements of fact, but as statements of an ideology.
I have given the evidence it’s just an attempt was made to refute it with talk of aliens.
Further, you have a responsibility to hold up your end of the counter evidence, which was tried but failed, I think if I remember rightly the person in question just got very emotional and cried like a big baby and ran off.
and even going so …show more content…
far as to make connections nobody mentioned (like the little 'aliens, therefore, Richard Dawkins' statements on aliens' incident).
oh I will make connections anyway I see fit, like it, dislike it, it matters little to me and quite frankly I care little of your opinions why would I, it would be like asking a paedophile advice on child care, you must understand you have nothing whatsoever to offer and everything to gain, so you be a good little boy and behave, your laminated badge may impress the gullible, you may as well have idiot on it as far as I'm concerned.
Please take a step back and look at your own arguments.
I no need they are checked and marked by someone who isn’t a raving atheist but just an atheist, if I get a “B” for a particular post because I was a little condescending that's fine, I only need a “C” to get the grade I need and it's important that the evil of new atheism is challenged whenever or wherever, we do not want another Starlin, mow, pol pot, hitler or dawkins do we,
If I claimed there was a little man named Jeff who controlled all my actions, but I couldn't show you him because he's invisible, and you couldn't touch him or smell him because he's intangible, would you believe me?
Hmm, I wouldn't believe anything you said! I do believe in dark matter, love, atoms, electrons, evolution (not macro ), does this answer your …show more content…
question.
On a separate note, I took it upon myself to take a look at your liked videos.
Do so, keep in mind because of my age (13) I share my profile with two others, Kate, and Alice, my dad won’t let me have a profile unless someone is there to supervise me, I am the WLC viewer, Kate and Alice view most other stuff, if Alice or Kate was to respond for me they would always close with Kate or K, Alice or A, to let the teacher know the marks were not to be attributed to me but to them, they would only get involved if you were to become abusive, or make sexual remarks to me.
Nearly all of them are "secret" documentaries posted to youtube and people loudly yelling at scientists.
Give me an example.
There's even stuff by William Lane Craig on there.
Ye, that would be me, possibly Alice.
William Lane Craig, for your god's sake.
Do explain what the problem is with him, my teacher recommend we check out him and Sam Harris to see how to formulate arguments. Are you showing your bias possibly?
No possibility about it, how about you?
"Atheist Physicists Prove God", "Microbiologist Loses Faith in Evolution", "DAWKINS'S (sic) POOR EYE DESIGN NONSENSE EXPOSED !!", all of these show your clear bias.
Err, yes so what? Are you showing yours? What if my bias was for, reason, logic, rationality and openness as opposed listening to those going on endlessly about religion and god, not God though, are you a religious atheist? The difference between science and believing things based on faith is that here, in reality
You do know sciences believe things on faith too don’t you?
Yes, and the difference between a five-year-old child and a 30-year-old scientist is 25 years, so what?
Science has done great harm and good, you need to keep your feet on the ground and keep contact with reality, it was scientist in the 50’s telling smokers, smoking was safe, it was scientist who made napalm, scientist who did unspeakable things to children in concentration camps, did my pastor make cluster bombs or was it a scientist? Mustard gas- that suffocated boys not much older than I, was that the pope who made that or scientist? I could go on and on, my dad said we judge something by its best not by its worst, when I told him that atheistic governments was the cause of the worst atrocities the world has ever known, murdering more in a hundred years than all the other years added together, he said man is capable of great compassion and great cruelty. Perhaps atheism taken to the lengths you guys takes it to makes good people do bad things, Dawkins informed me of that. So science is just as bad or as good as the bad and good it does
what you believe doesn't matter.
No, what you believe doesn’t matter to me, what I believe matters to me, further what I believe seems to matter greatly to you. that is true isn’t it?
Whether I believe in gravity or not, I'll still fall to my death if I jump off a cliff.
Hmm, I am wondering if you would be prepared to prove that to me.
Whether you believe in radiation or not doesn't make you able to wade through fallout unharmed.
Is this going somewhere?
The reason atheists don't believe in a god is because there is literally zero reliable evidence of it.
That’s interesting; however, what has that to do with a mind being able to be separated from the material of the brain? Have we changed subjects without someone telling me?
You can throw your insults around all you want,
Oh thank you so much, I will then.
it doesn't make your argument any more sound.
No, but the soundness of an argument is not something Richard taught me, he said ridicule them, disrespect them, and he got this enormous cheer, I’m wondering when I will get mine.
Anyway what did you want to say to
me?