Preview

Attention Getter For Smoking Persuasive Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1162 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Attention Getter For Smoking Persuasive Speech
Smoking in public, how safe is it?
Purpose: To argue.
Specific Purpose: To argue that it is discriminatory to smoker’s to not be allowed to smoke outside even when safeguards can be taken to ensure than no non-smoker is exposed to second-hand smoke.
Preview: I will show both that we have a natural right to smoke based on the philosophy that this county was founded on as well as present logical and scientific evidence that shows that people who choose to indulge in smoking can do so without endangering anyone.
Intro:
1. Attention Getter: I don’t believe any of us in America should have our rights restricted in any way except when our actions cause harm to others. This is exactly what is happening in this county concerning the rights of smokers.
…show more content…
Intro: There is currently no state or federal law banning smoking outside. The bans placed upon smoker’s come from private institutions that really have no right to place these restrictions on anyone, especially their paying customers. The entire idea is unenforceable, particularly when smokers refuse to obey the ban.
3. Credibility: I first started noticing no smoking in public restrictions on public doorways and hospitals. This made total sense to me, no non-smoker should have to walk through a cloud of cigarette smoke to get into or out of a building. When I heard that a smoking ban was being instituted campus wide I firmly believed this was overkill, unfair and something needed to be done about it.
4. Preview: I will show that adults have the right to make their own choices, even choices they know are bad for them and as long as they don’t endanger anyone else smokers should be allowed to smoke in outdoor, public places with certain safeguards put in place.
Transition: Smoking has been a social institution in this country from before it was founded. For many Americans it is a way of life and an expression of personal freedom. We must be wary though not to endanger those who wish to remain
…show more content…
Smoking is both a legal right and a deeply rooted tradition and lifestyle in this country and has been before its inception. It is also vital to the American economy.
1. Not being able to smoke is not just about addiction, many smokers, including myself are offended that anyone feels they have the right to regulate our legal behavior. Many potential customers, who hold this belief, refuse to give places such as this their business.
2. According to the World Lung Foundation, the tobacco industry is a 35 billion dollar business. The country’s economy would virtually collapse if the non-smokers had their way and found a way to ban smoking altogether. Wall street would plummet and thousands of people would be put out of work, especially in areas that are already marginalized by the rest of the country. (2)
Transition: I will represent the “popular view of smoking and debunk some of the Misconceptions surrounding the real dangers of smoking in public.

IV. According to reporter and researcher Daniel Fisher writing for Forbes magazine a study investigating the effects of passive smoking were false:
1- The study found no statistically significant relationship between lung cancer and exposure to passive

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Many people debate over where government intervention is appropriate and personal freedom should begin. One of these highly discussed topics is banning smoking in public places. The ban of smoking in public has many advantages and reasons. Smoking in public puts innocent adults, teenagers, and children at risk of serious health problems. If smoking is banned in public, this may help lower rates of potential smokers and current smokers as well. The welfare of the nonsmoker and the smoker are both affected by allowing smoking in public. By banning smoking in these areas, the population would be positively influenced.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smokers Get a Raw Deal

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even since people began smoking, smokers and nonsmokers have been able to live with one another using common courtesy and common sense. Not anymore. Today, smokers must put up with virtually unenforceable laws regulating when and where they can smoke—laws intended as much to discourage smoking itself as to protect the rights of nonsmokers. Much worse, supposedly responsible organizations devoted to the “public interest” are encouraging the harassment of those who smoke.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The name of this article is “Proposal for nationwide smoking ban gives some a bad taste.” This article was written by Associated Press, but was adapted by the Newsela Staff. It was published on November 20, 2015. Since this was a group effort there are no specific author credentials. The author’s intended audience is people who believe smoking in public places shouldn’t be allowed.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is noticeable that the author argues about smokers being discriminated and restricted from their rights. One reason why Scott argument is not strong is because of his meaning of discrimination. Scott argues that “discrimination is discrimination, no matter what it is based on”(175). Not everyone would agree with what he said. Scott exclude non-smokers perspective. It is not fair that non-smokers have to inhale the smoke from the cigarettes of smokers in a place with no ventilation. At the same time he is contradicting himself. He is saying that smokers are restricted because they have to smoke in an specific place. But if they smoke in front of people that doesn’t smoke, isn’t that restricting others to breathe natural air.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the following viewpoint, Stephen Kaufman, who is a staff writer for the Washington File, published by the U.S. Department of State, states that the American public has changed its attitude regarding to smoking (Kaufman 1). Kaufman supports his statement that public attitudes are changing in a meeting with John F. Banzhaf, an lawyer who teaches public interest law at George Washington Law School in Washington, D.C. (Kaufman 1). Smoking bans are generally seen as an effort to protect the health of nonsmokers (Kaufman 1). Eleven states have banned smoking in indoor public places such as malls, restaurants and bars (Kaufman 1).…

    • 3940 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoking has been a public health threat for many years, so the main policy objective of the Smoke-free Air Act is the protection and security of all individuals in New York City. The 2002 legislation was passed to ensure that all workers have a safe, smoke free workplace environment, and that all nonsmokers can breathe smoke-free air in public places. The law is an important part of New York City’s effort to eliminate tobacco use as it is one of the most significant public health threats.The Act is excepted to reduce the incidence of smoking-related illnesses which account nearly one of every five deaths, each year in the United States (U.S. Department, 2004).…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Smoking Bans in Casinos

    • 2139 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Many smokers argue that a smoking ban infringes on their rights to enjoy a cigarette. But really, it’s the non-smoker whose rights are violated when they are forced to gamble or work in a cloud of secondhand smoke. “Research from Stanford and Tufts universities shows secondhand smoke is a danger to millions of casino patrons and thousands of workers” (Myers). People have a right to enjoy a casino without being in danger. Baskies sums it up well:…

    • 2139 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, “Strategies”. It causes serious illness among an estimated 8.6 million persons, it cost $167 billion dollars, in annual health-related losses, and it kills approximately 438,000 people each year. Worldwide, smoking kills about 5 million a year, “Frieden and Blackman”. Through these statistics, you think people would realize that smoking is not something that should be messed with. Most of the reasons why smokers keep smoking is…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever come home with the stench of smoke just protruding from your clothes? Have you ever coughed and choked as you inhaled a cloud of smoke as a group of immature smokers passed by? If you have, then you would agree that neither one of these experiences is very pleasant, and could have been avoided if smoking was banned in public places.…

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tobacco and Its Effects

    • 1453 Words
    • 42 Pages

    Introduction Once considered a glamorous and sophisticated habit, smoking is now viewed with increasing disapproval. The recognition of the health risks of smoking is a primary cause of this change in public opinion, and it has led to significant changes in the behavior of many Americans. Over the past four decades, the proportion of cigarette smoking among adults in the United States has dropped 30%. Private businesses and all levels of government have jumped on the nonsmoking bandwagon. Almost every state now restricts smoking bands for indoor workplaces. The U.S. Surgeon General has proposed that America become a completely smoke-free society.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the United States, for every eight smokers that die from tobacco use, one non-smoker dies as well (Clarke 2010). In recent years, a growing awareness of the deadly effects of smoking has led to the enactment of tobacco control policies throughout the industrialized world. Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death worldwide (Jones 2009) estimating that one billion people are expected to die during the 21st century as a result of tobacco-related disease”(Cole 2012). Secondhand smoke (SHS) contains hundreds of toxic chemicals and is linked to cause cancer, coronary heart disease, and respiratory problems. Innocent individuals of all ages should not be impacted by the poor choices of smokers around them. After all, there is no risk-free level of exposure to someone else’s drifting smoke. The debate on smoking bans has rose significantly in the pass two decades. There are two types of bans, partial and full smoking bans. Full bans make it illegal to smoke in any public area. Although smoking is seen to be a personal right to many Americans, smoking should be banned in all public places. As a result the ban will overall reduce health risks, change smoking behavior in workplaces and improve the economy.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smoking vs. Non-Smoking

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In recent years the prohibition of smoking in or on college campuses, places of business, and healthcare facilities has increased dramatically. Some employers are going as far as firing people for smoking even in their own cars or simply smelling like smoke. More and more non-smokers and healthcare professionals have began calling for a ban on the production and sale of cigarettes. I believe outlawing the production and sale of cigarettes may cause more problems than it would help solve. Three important points that are typically pushed aside are: smoking is a choice banning it completely takes away your personal freedom of choice; Outlawing cigarettes may not fully dissolve the problem people will find a way to do it regardless; Banning cigarette sales may have a greater negative impact on our already struggling economy.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The belief that smoking is a right is to say the least, wrong; it is a freedom that is given to all adults, and like all freedoms, it can be taken away when abused. If we look at the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many reasons why smoking in public should be banned. The three main reasons to ban smoking in public are because of the health risks, offensive smell, and environmental risks that are the cause of cigarette smoke. Secondhand smoke is smoke from a cigarette, cigar, or pipe that is involuntarily inhaled, especially by non-smokers (The American Heritage Stedman’s Medical Dictionary, n.d.). In many public places smoking is allowed and is not fair because non-smokers are exposed to chemicals that can harm them internally and externally. Children for example, are chronic victims of secondhand smoke. The inhalation of cigarette smoke that can harm people nearby is called passive smoking (Pros Vs. Cons, 2007, p.1). Also cigarette smoke can make non-smokers agitated by the smell of cigarette smoke, which is not very pleasant. Also the environment is tainted by the hazardous chemicals, which can cause permanent scars on the earth. For the most part, smoking in public should be banned to help decreases its negative affects.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent months, dozens of localities and a number of states have enacted sweeping smoking bans. The bans generally forbid smoking in “public” places, which are defined to include not only publicly owned facilities but also privately owned properties to which members of the public are invited (e.g., bars, restaurants, hotel lobbies, etc.). Proponents of the bans insist that they are necessary to reduce risks to public health and welfare and to protect the rights of nonsmoking patrons and employees of the regulated establishments. Specifically, ban advocates have offered three justifications for government-imposed bans: First, they claim that such bans are warranted because indoor smoking involves a “negative externality,” the market failure normally invoked to justify regulation of the ambient environment. In addition, advocates assert that smoking bans shape individual preferences against smoking, thereby reducing the number of smokers in society. Finally, proponents argue that smoking bans are justified, regardless of whether any market failure is present, simply because of the health risks associated with inhalation of environmental tobacco smoke (ets), commonly referred to as “secondhand smoke.” This article contends that government-imposed smoking bans cannot be justified as responses to market failure, as means of shaping preferences, or on risk-reduction grounds. Smoking bans reduce public welfare by preventing an optimal allocation of nonsmoking and smoking-permitted public places. A laissez-faire approach better accommodates heterogeneous preferences regarding public smoking.…

    • 5926 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays