Preview

Attention Getter For Smoking Persuasive Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1162 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Attention Getter For Smoking Persuasive Speech
Smoking in public, how safe is it?
Purpose: To argue.
Specific Purpose: To argue that it is discriminatory to smoker’s to not be allowed to smoke outside even when safeguards can be taken to ensure than no non-smoker is exposed to second-hand smoke.
Preview: I will show both that we have a natural right to smoke based on the philosophy that this county was founded on as well as present logical and scientific evidence that shows that people who choose to indulge in smoking can do so without endangering anyone.
Intro:
1. Attention Getter: I don’t believe any of us in America should have our rights restricted in any way except when our actions cause harm to others. This is exactly what is happening in this county concerning the rights of smokers.
…show more content…
Intro: There is currently no state or federal law banning smoking outside. The bans placed upon smoker’s come from private institutions that really have no right to place these restrictions on anyone, especially their paying customers. The entire idea is unenforceable, particularly when smokers refuse to obey the ban.
3. Credibility: I first started noticing no smoking in public restrictions on public doorways and hospitals. This made total sense to me, no non-smoker should have to walk through a cloud of cigarette smoke to get into or out of a building. When I heard that a smoking ban was being instituted campus wide I firmly believed this was overkill, unfair and something needed to be done about it.
4. Preview: I will show that adults have the right to make their own choices, even choices they know are bad for them and as long as they don’t endanger anyone else smokers should be allowed to smoke in outdoor, public places with certain safeguards put in place.
Transition: Smoking has been a social institution in this country from before it was founded. For many Americans it is a way of life and an expression of personal freedom. We must be wary though not to endanger those who wish to remain
…show more content…
Smoking is both a legal right and a deeply rooted tradition and lifestyle in this country and has been before its inception. It is also vital to the American economy.
1. Not being able to smoke is not just about addiction, many smokers, including myself are offended that anyone feels they have the right to regulate our legal behavior. Many potential customers, who hold this belief, refuse to give places such as this their business.
2. According to the World Lung Foundation, the tobacco industry is a 35 billion dollar business. The country’s economy would virtually collapse if the non-smokers had their way and found a way to ban smoking altogether. Wall street would plummet and thousands of people would be put out of work, especially in areas that are already marginalized by the rest of the country. (2)
Transition: I will represent the “popular view of smoking and debunk some of the Misconceptions surrounding the real dangers of smoking in public.

IV. According to reporter and researcher Daniel Fisher writing for Forbes magazine a study investigating the effects of passive smoking were false:
1- The study found no statistically significant relationship between lung cancer and exposure to passive

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    America is recognized for its laws regarding freedom. By allowing smoking in public places, we are taking away the freedom of health from nonsmokers. Through banning areas where smoking is permitted, we limit freedoms of the smoker, but do not eliminate the freedom entirely. The ban would be seen more as a restriction on where these freedoms can be exercised to ensure well being for all people, smokers and nonsmokers. These limitations are for the good of the American people as a whole, which makes the ban an appropriate course of action.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smokers Get a Raw Deal

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even since people began smoking, smokers and nonsmokers have been able to live with one another using common courtesy and common sense. Not anymore. Today, smokers must put up with virtually unenforceable laws regulating when and where they can smoke—laws intended as much to discourage smoking itself as to protect the rights of nonsmokers. Much worse, supposedly responsible organizations devoted to the “public interest” are encouraging the harassment of those who smoke.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The name of this article is “Proposal for nationwide smoking ban gives some a bad taste.” This article was written by Associated Press, but was adapted by the Newsela Staff. It was published on November 20, 2015. Since this was a group effort there are no specific author credentials. The author’s intended audience is people who believe smoking in public places shouldn’t be allowed.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “Smokers Get a Raw Deal” Scott explains that smokers are being restricted from their freedom as normal people and “discriminated” because of laws created to prohibit the places they can’t smoke. He tries to guarantee the reader about the discrimination that smokers are having by giving some examples to convince the reader about the situation. He also tells that anti-smokers attacks smokers with the help of organizations .However the author doesn’t achieve to persuade the reader with his argument.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the following viewpoint, Stephen Kaufman, who is a staff writer for the Washington File, published by the U.S. Department of State, states that the American public has changed its attitude regarding to smoking (Kaufman 1). Kaufman supports his statement that public attitudes are changing in a meeting with John F. Banzhaf, an lawyer who teaches public interest law at George Washington Law School in Washington, D.C. (Kaufman 1). Smoking bans are generally seen as an effort to protect the health of nonsmokers (Kaufman 1). Eleven states have banned smoking in indoor public places such as malls, restaurants and bars (Kaufman 1).…

    • 3940 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Smoke-Free Air Act,trades off liberty for security. Smokers will now be unable to smoke were they wish. Essentially, property rights to restrict consumer choice hae been infridged upon and have been shifted from smokers to non- smokers, in the interests of health and security. Smokers are openly against this act because it violates their…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Smoking Bans in Casinos

    • 2139 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Many smokers argue that a smoking ban infringes on their rights to enjoy a cigarette. But really, it’s the non-smoker whose rights are violated when they are forced to gamble or work in a cloud of secondhand smoke. “Research from Stanford and Tufts universities shows secondhand smoke is a danger to millions of casino patrons and thousands of workers” (Myers). People have a right to enjoy a casino without being in danger. Baskies sums it up well:…

    • 2139 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In “I’d Rather Smoke Than Kiss,” Florence King states that no matter what American society thinks, says or does, it will not convince her to quit smoking. King 's choice of words suggests that the government purposely tries to segregate all smokers from non-smokers, by making signs or segregating areas for smokers to go. She implies that all non-smokers are against smokers and will do anything in their power to stop them by passing laws. A lot of cigarette companies tell people that if they stop smoking, it will put a strain on the economy, “Strategies”. King 's article is important because her arguments exemplify different observational situations, which society imposes on smokers in the United States and offers knowledge about some of the issues of discrimination towards smokers by combining personal experience and actual situations that smokers encounter everyday in life.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever come home with the stench of smoke just protruding from your clothes? Have you ever coughed and choked as you inhaled a cloud of smoke as a group of immature smokers passed by? If you have, then you would agree that neither one of these experiences is very pleasant, and could have been avoided if smoking was banned in public places.…

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tobacco and Its Effects

    • 1453 Words
    • 42 Pages

    Introduction Once considered a glamorous and sophisticated habit, smoking is now viewed with increasing disapproval. The recognition of the health risks of smoking is a primary cause of this change in public opinion, and it has led to significant changes in the behavior of many Americans. Over the past four decades, the proportion of cigarette smoking among adults in the United States has dropped 30%. Private businesses and all levels of government have jumped on the nonsmoking bandwagon. Almost every state now restricts smoking bands for indoor workplaces. The U.S. Surgeon General has proposed that America become a completely smoke-free society.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the United States, for every eight smokers that die from tobacco use, one non-smoker dies as well (Clarke 2010). In recent years, a growing awareness of the deadly effects of smoking has led to the enactment of tobacco control policies throughout the industrialized world. Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death worldwide (Jones 2009) estimating that one billion people are expected to die during the 21st century as a result of tobacco-related disease”(Cole 2012). Secondhand smoke (SHS) contains hundreds of toxic chemicals and is linked to cause cancer, coronary heart disease, and respiratory problems. Innocent individuals of all ages should not be impacted by the poor choices of smokers around them. After all, there is no risk-free level of exposure to someone else’s drifting smoke. The debate on smoking bans has rose significantly in the pass two decades. There are two types of bans, partial and full smoking bans. Full bans make it illegal to smoke in any public area. Although smoking is seen to be a personal right to many Americans, smoking should be banned in all public places. As a result the ban will overall reduce health risks, change smoking behavior in workplaces and improve the economy.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smoking vs. Non-Smoking

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    My first point I would like you to ponder is every day we find ourselves losing more and more of our freedom of personal choice. Examples include things such as pressuring people to eat healthier and go green. I believe that it’s great to make better use of our resources and eat healthier, but it should be our own choice how we decide to take care of ourselves and make choices. The fact is at the end of the day we all have to face the consequences of our own actions. Shouldn’t the decision to smoke or not be our own to make? Consider this, what if it was made unlawful to…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 26 March, 2003, the New York State legislators approved a state-wide smoking ban in all bars and restaurants. Governor Pataki signed it immediately; a similar bill was defeated one year earlier. The ban took effect July 24, 2003. Many of us believe in our rights or freedoms as citizen, what many forget is sometimes our right or freedoms will impact the rights or freedoms of others. I have countless friends who smoke; I do not. When Texas started to embrace the no smoking policy pioneered by New York, I was pleased. We all have the right or freedom to smoke, but not when it puts others at risk. In a 2007 Gallup poll the poll found that 54% of Americans favored a complete ban inside of restaurants, 34% favored a ban in all hotel rooms, and 29% favored a ban inside of bars. Second hand smoking can be more dangerous than smoking the cigarettes themselves. According to the American Cancer Society Secondhand smoke, also known as environmental tobacco smoke, is a mixture of 2 forms of smoke that come from burning tobacco: the smoke that comes from the end of the burning cigarette, and smoke that is exhaled by a smoker. Some statistics released by the American Cancer Society state:…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many reasons why smoking in public should be banned. The three main reasons to ban smoking in public are because of the health risks, offensive smell, and environmental risks that are the cause of cigarette smoke. Secondhand smoke is smoke from a cigarette, cigar, or pipe that is involuntarily inhaled, especially by non-smokers (The American Heritage Stedman’s Medical Dictionary, n.d.). In many public places smoking is allowed and is not fair because non-smokers are exposed to chemicals that can harm them internally and externally. Children for example, are chronic victims of secondhand smoke. The inhalation of cigarette smoke that can harm people nearby is called passive smoking (Pros Vs. Cons, 2007, p.1). Also cigarette smoke can make non-smokers agitated by the smell of cigarette smoke, which is not very pleasant. Also the environment is tainted by the hazardous chemicals, which can cause permanent scars on the earth. For the most part, smoking in public should be banned to help decreases its negative affects.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent months, dozens of localities and a number of states have enacted sweeping smoking bans. The bans generally forbid smoking in “public” places, which are defined to include not only publicly owned facilities but also privately owned properties to which members of the public are invited (e.g., bars, restaurants, hotel lobbies, etc.). Proponents of the bans insist that they are necessary to reduce risks to public health and welfare and to protect the rights of nonsmoking patrons and employees of the regulated establishments. Specifically, ban advocates have offered three justifications for government-imposed bans: First, they claim that such bans are warranted because indoor smoking involves a “negative externality,” the market failure normally invoked to justify regulation of the ambient environment. In addition, advocates assert that smoking bans shape individual preferences against smoking, thereby reducing the number of smokers in society. Finally, proponents argue that smoking bans are justified, regardless of whether any market failure is present, simply because of the health risks associated with inhalation of environmental tobacco smoke (ets), commonly referred to as “secondhand smoke.” This article contends that government-imposed smoking bans cannot be justified as responses to market failure, as means of shaping preferences, or on risk-reduction grounds. Smoking bans reduce public welfare by preventing an optimal allocation of nonsmoking and smoking-permitted public places. A laissez-faire approach better accommodates heterogeneous preferences regarding public smoking.…

    • 5926 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays