Document-Based Question: Attitudes Toward Technology
Complete and submit this assignment by the due date to receive full credit.
(45 points)
To complete this Graded Assignment, retrieve the 2007 DBQ on Han and Roman Empire attitudes toward technology. Use this document with its essay instructions and the DBQ Checklist to complete this DBQ essay. Consult the rubric throughout the process.
Using the documents, analyze Han and Roman attitudes toward technology. Identify one additional type of document and explain briefly how it would help your analysis.
Essay:
The Roman and the Han were by far the most technologically advanced civilizations of their time. The time period for both of the societies depicted whether or not the people were inclined to their advancements or not. Much evidence goes to show that both the Roman and Han societies attitudes towards technology in B.C.E. were more negative and in C.E. they leaned more positive. In the documents given, it is evident that during the B.C.E. both the Roman and Han’s attitude toward their technologies were negative. Little did they know how helpful they would turn out to be and how they would revolutionize the world forever. This is first apparent from an excerpt from a Han government official. He states that they need more water conservation offices that are staffed with people who are experienced to aid the local community with the floods (doc. 1). This exemplifies that the people were dissatisfied with the lack of officials to keep the community organized and free of danger. This negative theme is also seen in a passage written by a Han government official (Han Guan) who is complaining about the iron tools and how they were made better when they were made individually by the common people rather than mass-produced by the state. He also touches on the fact that salt and iron prices have sky rocketed so the common people could not afford to season their food and make tools for themselves (doc. 2). This shows how peoples reaction to the tools were not widely accepted by them of this time. Granted they had the right to be up in arms about the desecration of the tools and different technologies made by the state. His resentment was apparent towards the mass production of tools and the state. Lastly, this continuing negative approach on technology is found in an excerpt from a Roman political leader (Cicero). He states that people are wasting their time with different crafts rather than aiding the army or working in an area that is more productive for the community (doc. 5). This bold statement made by Cicero is definitely biased because many would believe that crafts and things help release the spirit and help people to flourish. I would disagree greatly with this excerpt and say that we would be nowhere now if people didn’t associate with crafts and fiddle with technology. If we just had people to fight in the war and protect us, we would never advance. Altogether, a common negative theme in both the Han and Roman societies is prominent towards technology. In the rest of the documents, they are written in the C.E. and there is a definite change in their attitudes towards technology in both the Roman and Han. They finally came to realize the great benefit of their advancements and to appreciate what they have been able to accomplish. This change in attitude is first apparent in an excerpt from an upper class Han philosopher (Huan Tan). In this excerpt Huan explains how the pestle and mortar have been used and benefit them greatly in more ways than one (doc. 3). This excerpt greatly exemplifies how advanced their technologies were and how they continued to improve. This helped the people’s life to be easier and save time doing everyday chores. The next example of this positive reaction to technology is found in a passage of the History of the Early Han Dynasty. It explains that Tu Shih invented a water-powered blowing-engine that allowed people to benefit from little labor (doc. 4) This passage praises this advancement and shows how their lives were made simpler and easier by the invention of different tools. Another excerpt from Seneca an upper class Roman philosopher seems to have a negative view at first glance but beyond the surface, it is actually positive. Seneca states that he does not believe that wise people created the tools created for the crafts, but the crafts are beneficial (doc. 7). His argument is a skewed because for the crafts to be beneficial you need these tools to associate with these crafts and execute them successfully. Lastly, an excerpt from a Roman general (Frontinus) continues with this theme of positivism towards technology. Throughout the entire excerpt he continually praises the aqueducts of the Roman society (doc. 8).
The advanced technology of the Romans, including the aqueduct systems made the Romans the most advanced societies of them all. All in all, an overall theme in the Common Era is that of a positive attitude towards technology in both the Roman and Han society. As previously stated, it is evident that in both of the Roman and Han societies, their attitudes towards their technology depended on the time period. These documents provide a wide variety of opinions and aid in stating that this thesis is correct. Through all of the advances throughout both of their reigns, people were more inclined appreciate and have a positive attitude during the Common Era opposed to B.C.E.
Scoring
Your teacher may use the following rubric and scoring instructions to grade your response.
Generic Core Scoring Guide for AP European History
Document-Based Question
(score scale 0–9)
Basic Core
Points
Expanded Core
Points
1. Provides an appropriate, explicitly stated thesis that directly addresses all parts of the question. Thesis should not simply restate the question.
1
Expands beyond basic core of 1–7. The basic score of 7 must be achieved before a student can earn expanded core points.
Examples:
Has a clear, analytical, and comprehensive thesis.
Shows careful and insightful analysis of the documents.
Uses documents persuasively as evidence.
Analyzes point of view in most or all documents.
Analyzes the documents in additional ways—groupings, comparisons, syntheses.
Brings in relevant “outside” historical content.
Explains why additional types of documents or sources are needed.
0–2
2. Addresses all of the documents and demonstrates understanding of all or all but one.
1
3. Supports thesis with appropriate evidence from all or all but one document. (Supports thesis with appropriate evidence from all but two documents.)
2
4. Analyzes point of view in at least two documents.
1
5. Analyzes documents by grouping them in two or three ways, depending on the question.
1
6. Identifies and explains the need for one type of appropriate additional document or source.
1
Subtotal
7
Subtotal
2
AP Core Scoring TOTAL 9
Source: Copyright © 2011. The College Board. Reproduced with permission. http://apcentral.collegeboard.com.
Scoring Instructions
To calculate the final grade for this assignment, your teacher will add the basic and expanded scores together and multiply the total score by 5.
AP Core Scoring Total
____ × 5 = ____
Total Score:
____ / 45
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Around times ranging from the first century B.C.E all the way to the first century C.E. two large cultures with slightly differing opinions pertaining to technology were those of Han China and Rome. While Rome, a civilization set upon expansion and conquest; saw little need for adaptive technology lest it aided in the plundering lifestyle Rome’s economy was based upon, Han China was much more tolerant towards advancements in technology even as they preferred a more traditional lifestyle. The two main branches of technology presented through the documents include: Technology introduced by governing bodies/officials, and technology innovated by the common consumer.…
- 696 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…
- 382 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…
- 64 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The Han dynasty and Roman Empire demonstrated many different attitudes and reaction as new technological advancements emerged and diffused thought the empire. The romans sought out that tradition was necessary to incorporate and implement into their works, which involved much more workload. On the other hand the Han accepted of most new advancements, as it benefited and contributed toward their social and economic status, that develop rapidly…
- 439 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Hans respect technology and the people who use it. In China, 2nd century B.C.E. a government official stated that he wanted to organize their labor force with the use of technology so they could help to prevent a disaster from occurring when and if a flood takes place. This could help the people from getting hurt and their property from getting destroyed (Doc. 1). Huan Guan, a Han government official during the first century B.C.E. was concerned about the lack of technology and poor government policy that is affecting the people. Haun Guan was trying to say to the Han government that using convict labor to make tools and monopoly on salt and iron is causing devastating affects towards the people and feels that the government can solve this problem by using the available technologies. Even though Haun Guan is a government official himself, he shows interest in helping the people and is very critical towards the current government policies that are in place (Doc. 2). Huan Tan, a upper class Han philosopher during 20 C.E. is expressing his…
- 926 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire are both similar and different in terms of their technological achievements. These two empires have set examples on how to be a flourishing, organized, well developed and successful society. One reason modern day Asia is so successful is because of the Han Dynasty. One reason modern day North America and Europe are so successful is because we somewhat follow in the footsteps of the Roman Empire. Our political systems are highly influenced by the Roman Empire. Future generations should not just learn from past generation’s mistakes, but also from past generations achievements. Modern day…
- 624 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Classical Romans and Hans both had fascinating views on technology. Because they were both such great empires, they managed to create a wide variety of technology. When the scholars were inventing it, they were focused on creating life much easier than it was. Technology was made important in more than one way, and attitudes toward it varied from person to person. And even though these attitudes varied, the technology was still improved to become the basis of what we have today. The Han and Romans’ attitudes toward technology were aimed at improving their tools since most of the Han technology is about agriculture and ways to decrease the workload, while the Romans sought to create an easier way of transporting goods throughout the empire, while maintaining a mathematical system to regulate it.…
- 1059 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han and the Romans were ahead of the game when it came to technology. However, they both had very different attitudes towards the subject. The Han were determined to get ahead and they were supportive of others who made advances within the empire, whereas the Romans, although determined to get ahead, were arrogant and judgmental of each other’s work.…
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire covered a lot of territory in Eurasia. From the year 1000B.C.E. (when the first settlement on the site of Rome occurred) to 600C.E. (just after the fall of both empires) the technological advances made were astonishing. Maps, pictures, and written documents are able to portray the details of what life was like in both of these large empires. All three of these will be used to explain how more technological inventions allowed these two empires to expand their control over the land. Although the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were both large and powerful, it was mainly due to their technological advances.…
- 944 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Chinese attitude towards technology was that it should be useful to and help the common people. The Roman attitude towards technology was that it was it was of little prestige and didn't relate to the upper classes and was therefore of less importance.…
- 462 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
rome and hans political administration and cultural challenges was very intersting. While rome and han created cultural and administrative difficulties that led to their downfall of there empires they still left a big mark on how to become a succersor empire. Rome and Han empires were very different on there administrative views. The romans chose there leader and all the people were taxed equally and more interregional interactive, they were kind of like a democracy, unlike han where everything was based on the social system. The han dynasty power was passed down the family so you basically had to be born into the elite class, they were also taxed on class and very divided this upset some people and later on lead to the yellow turban rebellion and was one reason for the downfall. the reason they were like this was because the empores had varying justification for living. Since both empires were so large the voume of long distance trade increased dramatically. They traded luxury goods, food, crops, technology, cultural beliefs, and also disease pathogens. The diseases were a huge part of the collapse of both empires because so many people were dying and the people that werent dying were angry. The empires wanted to intergrate rapidly but they did not think there would be this much chaos. They were similar in many ways though. Both empires had very popular leaders. For rome they had constantine who endorsed chrisitnaity and wanted to make peace with the other religions in rome, he also funded buildings and built churches. For the Han Empire their leader was Bhuda who also legalized buddhism and founded buildings, built monastraires, roads and rest stops. Both the leaders wanted unity and peace and they also gained popularity which led to all there followers and there…
- 300 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Han dynasty was proud of the efficiency of their technology and their ability to prevent natural disasters. The Romans marveled at their technological advancements, but didn’t think it was very enlightening when it came to craft.…
- 495 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Although both the Han and Roman Empire were advanced one was more complex than the other. Both the Han China and the Roman Empire were highly sophisticated and contemporary in the evolution of their technology. Both Empires had very efficient, formulated and solid mechanized skills, yet the Romans cherished their technology only for its beauty, elegance and aesthetics. whereas the Hans valued their technology for its advantages and uses. This explains how these two, classical civilizations had very different perspectives towards technology.…
- 504 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
___ was NOT a reason for the decline of the Roman Empire. A. A strong military C. The invasions by Germanic tribes and by Huns B. The huge amount of money spent on defense, D. The disruption of trade coupled with inflation ____ 37. What regions of the world today are still strongly influenced by the achievements of Rome? A. Europe and the Middle East C. the Middle East and Africa B. Europe and the United States D. Africa and the United States ____ 38. All of the following resulted from the repeated invasions of the Germanic tribes that led to the fall of the Roman Empire EXCEPT A. the disruption of trade. C. the ruralization of the population. B. the declining in learning. D. the establishment of a common language. ____ 39. Why did learning decline during the last years of Roman Empire? A. Invaders burned most of the empire's C. Everything written in Greek was destroyed by collections of manuscripts. the invaders. B. Invaders could neither read nor write and did D. All of the above are true. not understand Latin. ____ 40. The achievement for which Charlemagne is most remembered was A. traveling to Rome to crush a mob threatening C. visiting every part of his kingdom to ensure the pope. justice. B. building an empire larger than any since Rome. D. halting the expansion of the Muslim empire. ____ 41. What was the significance of Pope Leo III crowning Charlemagne emperor? A. It started the tradition of popes crowning C. It gave a great deal of power to the Germanic emperors in the city of Aachen. people. B. Charlemagne was under the Pope's control D. It joined Germanic power with the Church and from that time on. the heritage of Rome. ____ 42. According to the code of chivalry, a knight fought for all of the following EXCEPT A. his lady. C. his feudal lord. B. his country. D. his heavenly Lord. ____ 43. The bargain made between a lord and a vassal was A. that the vassal would build a city on the lord's C. that the lord would grant the vassal land in lands.…
- 4706 Words
- 19 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Mitcham talks about the relations between technology and humanity. He starts with the chicken-and-egg question “Which is primary-humanity or knowledge?” What exactly is happening? Is it that we influence the technology or is it so happening that the technology is shaping our morals and us? At this point he quotes one of the Winston Churchill quotations that “We shape our buildings and thereafter they shape us “. Then he tries to answer this question by saying it is a mutual relationship in between these two but even the mutual relationship take different forms. He then proposes a three ways of being with the technology and takes the whole document on structural analysis of the three forms.…
- 1539 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays