prospective voting- voting for a candidate because you favor his or her ideas for handling issues…
The correlations between a candidate running for election and a voter who participates in the election, in terms of support and participation, often involve the use of shared attributes to explain how said correlations have an impact on the outcome of the election. In a representative democracy such as the United States, the belief is that those who vote in elections wield the power to select government officials, who then in turn create, uphold, or interpret the law of the land accordingly. Those who participate in elections, therefore, believe that the candidate they select will make decisions or introduce legislature according to the beliefs that those who voted share with one another. A voter or a group of voters are more likely to support a candidate if they share at least one attribute with one another. In order to understand how candidate selection based on belief is accomplished, an account of how exactly comparisons between the candidate and the voter must be made to accommodate a multitude of potential attributes. Both physical attributes, such as race, and non-physical attributes, such as political ideology, can be used to compare and contrast a candidate with a voter. With this data, we can then predict the outcome between a certain attribute that a voter shares (or does not share) with a candidate and the support that candidate receives from that conglomerate.…
When candidates compete in a campaign they have to stand out and set themselves apart from the others. The candidates would talk about important topics that they would like to change and raise awareness towards the major issues. Depending on their viewpoints on the issues helps them develop a fan base which helps them receive votes. Voter’s elects the person who they feel is more compatible for the position of being president. Voter looks for someone who is going to change things for the better and make the nation better.…
ATTRIBUTION OF BLAME: A process whereby victims are faulted for bringing maltreatment on themselves, or extraordinary circumstances are invoked as justification for questionable conduct. (p. 112)…
Attributions are the causal judgments about why the event or behavior occurred. These attributions can be either internal (made about a person’s characteristics, e.g. personality) or external (made about a person’s situation e.g. weather). One type of the attribution theory that helps us to determine the “why” in behavior is the Kelley’s Covariation Model of Attribution (Kelley, 1967). In this model, behaviour is analyzed to see how well it is correlated either internal or external factors or a combination of both. When making attributions using the Kelley’s covariation there are three criteria in which the attributions are based on: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Consensus criterion is whether the behavior is correlated with the situation or in other terms whether different people do this behavior in the same situation. Distinctiveness refers to the correlation between behaviour and the individual specifically how unique the behavior is to that particular situation. Last out of the three is consistency which looks at how behavior is correlated with both the person and the situation that is, is the behavior is the same towards the…
Attribution theory: an attempt when individuals observe behavior to determine whether it is internally or externally caused…
The Political process in today’s presidential race deals primarily with money spent rather than votes earned. Due to delegate rule on our voting system and corruption brought about by money funded corporations and media, candidates promises are more discriminatory than for the people.…
It is more important that an elected official is properly chosen than that more people cast a vote. The informed population should be the ones casting the vote, because if the time has not been taken to learn about the candidates what is the point in voting? Voting along party lines or for racial or gender reasons is absurd and reinforces the problem George Washington alluded to after serving for two terms as president. George Washington warned about the threat political parties posed to democracy. Today, the competition is much needed for government but the problem lies in voting along party lines because this is purely an uneducated vote. It is not analyzing candidate by candidate what they could bring to Congress or as a President; rather it is assuming all candidates within a party are cookie cutter. It is nothing short of naïve to think all candidates of a party are the same. Each politician has had different positions on different issues ranging from staunch to moderate and some have even altered their opinion throughout their career. Without the proper knowledge, a vote cast is a vote wasted.…
When we have insufficient information to understand another motives, goals, or behaviors or when we do not understand how another is responding to us.…
Voters too often judge candidates by slogans, name recognition, and public image. Because the media plays such a huge role in society it is hard for voters to move past a candidate’s image and to the inside of the candidate as an everyday person.…
There were many reasons for me to pick an article about the US presidential elections as my topic of discussion. I have always been interested in the world of politics, being involved in it myself, during my early school days as a student representative. There is so many things that the politicians have to take into account while making important decisions that will affect our daily lives. Because so many important information that go into decision making cannot be disclosed to the general public, because of their delicacy, a lot of the times politicians have a bad reputation in general public’s eyes.…
To reiterate, the best way to improve democracy in the U.S. is by individualizing, localizing, and cleaning up elections and the voting system, but not everybody agrees. The first criticism to this position is that individualizing the voting system is giving additional power to the uninformed voter. This is understandable for the reason that these voters have already made an impact in the current elections, and giving those with outdated, or uninformed views will do nothing but hurt the elections. However, the manipulation of uninformed voters by the candidates is very common, and candidates practice advertising tactics such as attack ads to alter the view of these uninformed voters. Jeffrey Koch, author of “Campaign Advertisements’ Impact…
What each candidate believes and stands for should be a big deciding factor for one to use in deciding which candidate to vote for. One may not agree with everything that a presidential candidate says, but one should agree as closely as possible to the candidate that he or she chooses. Donald Trump’s stand against abortion and his desire to do something about illegal immigration are some things that caused me to choose…
Each voter wants to see their beliefs mimicked in the candidate that would potentially have the power to make them laws. If their ideals match, and the voter feels that a certain candidate has a similar perspective, they overlook their other qualities that are not as electable. Take for example Donald Trump’s electability, people would think he would immediately be pushed out of the race by more formal candidates, but instead he is the favorite to win the republican nomination. But why? It could be an issue with our brains and reasoning skills. Dan Kahan, in his study for the Cultural Cognition Project, found that people’s political beliefs can disrupt their ability to properly process data contrary to their ideas. He says, “ICT sees the public’s otherwise intact capacity to comprehend decision-relevant science as disabled by cultural and political conflict.”(Kahan 2-3). In what he calls the Identity-protective Cognition Theory (ITC) someone's ideals and political beliefs are shaped, not by factual data, but cultural and social identity. The easiest example of this concept is someone who identifies as a republican having to vote for a republican despite…
Many people look in their candidate, a person that has their same believes or point of view. Some people vote, because their feel that a certain candidate has more chances of winning than the others. Other bases their votes, about what their candidates have said about public schools, health care and other issues that they consider important. The candidate that we choose, are going to pass laws that can either affect, or benefit us. If a person is not sure about witch candidate to vote for, they can watch the debates. We should also research their true opinion on popular issues. Sometimes social media or people say things about a candidate, that are not true. Also, the media and the news can be biased on a specific subject. In the debates they are ask a series of question about issues that are important to the country, and they answer the questions. It’s important to be sure that the candidates that we are voting for are the right ones, because that either affects or benefits us for the following…