Preview

Australian Court Hierarchy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Australian Court Hierarchy
The term "Court Hierarchy" is a very important word in the law world in modern society. It's definition gives a very clear and concise meaning to the law industry. The phrase can be split into two words to be easily dealt and understood. The word "court" is from a Greek derivative "cohors" or "cohort" meaning courtyard or retinue. It's definition from the dictionary certainly portrays the law as a very important and distinguished practice. "a. A person or body of persons whose task is to hear and submit a decision on cases at law." "b. The building, hall, or room in which such cases are heard and determined." The word, "hierarchy", however, has a more powerful and specific relation to the law world. It is a Greek derived word and originally came from the word "hierarkhia", meaning the rule of a high priest. "a. A body of clergy organized into successive ranks or grades with each level subordinate to the one above." "b. A series in which each element is graded or ranked." By placing these two words together, it has a responsibility of giving the public a definition of one of the most important practices portrayed by the Court System of Australia. Court Hierarchy is the term given to the system in which the Courts of Australia are split into different levels to deal with different matters by different levels of severity.
<br>
<br>The jurisdiction of courts' is very important due to the fact that different courts deal with special matters differently from another court. The term jurisdiction means "a. The right and power to interpret and apply the law." This means that the different courts of Australia deal with matters according to severity and relevance of that particular case to be heard in the highest possible court. This is the how the courts of Australia deal with which cases are heard in a specific court. No two courts have the same areas of jurisdiction even though it is a fact that the same case can be appealed and heard in a different court. The higher court

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The role of the courts: Courts have certain jurisdiction over certain areas of the law. There are several levels of court in NSW which are set out in hierarchical order. The NSW Courts are as…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority and right to speak the law or render a decision in a legal dispute. According to The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice, jurisdiction can be described as, is a court’s authority to decide a particular case based on (1) who the parties are, and (2) the subject matter of the dispute” (Melvin, 2012, p.58).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CarrieWhite unit6 Seminar

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Then you went over jurisdiction of a court refers to those in cases in which it may exercise lawful authority which is determined by statute or constitution. The question that you asked I honestly think that answer would be yes. Then you went over the state court system many differences among state courts which use three tiered structure which are trial courts of limited jurisdiction, trial courts of general jurisdiction,…

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homework Assignment 5

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear and decide cases. There are several types; a few are Appellate Jurisdiction, General Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction. Appellate is a court that hears a case an appeal from a lower court. General is a court that hears various kinds of cases in general. Subject Matter is a court that can hear only certain kinds of cases listed in the federal statutes and constitution. Personal is a court that makes decisions binding on the person involved in a civil case.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction is the authority of the court to hear a case. For example federal court hears federal laws, where a state court hears states laws and a civil court hears civil cases. State courts would never hear federal issues because of jurisdiction(Miller & Jentz, 2010).…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Schmalleger, F. (2009). Criminal Justice Today. An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, (10th ed.). : Pearson Education.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The authority of a court to hear and decide cases is called the jurisdiction. When a case is first brought to court is the authority of the original jurisdiction. When there is an error of law and the courts need to review the case, they will go to the appellate jurisdiction. When the court has the power to hear any case, this is called general jurisdiction. Special jurisdiction is where the court has the authority to hear exceptional circumstances. A particular…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Evaluate the effectiveness of the Australian legal system in recognising and protecting the changing nature of the family’.…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the name suggests, the adversary system in Australia refers to a method of trial, which involves contestants or adversaries, that is, it is an adversarial approach in attempting to resolve legal issues between two opposing sides. There are five features of the adversary system in Australia; contest; party control; strict rules of evidence and procedures; role of the judge or magistrate and single event trials. The strengths and weaknesses of the adversary system, which has evolved through out history are varied, and as a result the question of whether this system provides justice is often challenged.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Appendix D CJS/240

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Briefly review the discussions in the other two topics you did not choose for your first response on conversation starter 1. In a 200- to 300-word response, address the main points for and against the two controversial issues.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most essential inquiries of law is whether a particular court has authority to preside over a given case. The jurisdictional question may be broken down into three components: is jurisdiction over the person, is jurisdiction over the subject matter, and is jurisdiction to render the particular judgment sought. Then there is different courts that have jurisdiction depending on the case. State courts have general jurisdiction, meaning that they can hear any controversy except those prohibited by their specific state laws.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Branch of the United States is network of courts that interprets and applies laws. Though they generally do not create laws, they decipher them and apply them to a certain case. One of the powers of the judiciary is the power to declare laws unconstitutional. Under the system of Checks and Balances, this main check that the judiciary has on both the legislative and executive branch is the power of judicial review. This power allows the Supreme Court to examine and compare acts undertaken by Congress (legislative branch) and the executive branch and invalidate them in both federal and state governments. Essentially, this means that the Court can overturn any move by state law or Congress if the Court is under the belief that an…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction is the authority given by law to a court to try cases and rule on legal matters within a particular geographic area and/or over certain types of legal case. Venue is the particular county or geographical area in which a court with jurisdiction may hear and determine a case.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Courts of original jurisdiction hear the original evidence and thoughts along with witness testimony for the first time. Supreme courts has exclusive jurisdiction over the cases it hears, and parties may not settle a dispute between states without the original authority of the Supreme Court. After both sides are presented, a decision is made by either a judge or a jury. Both federal and state courts harbor trial courts, and conduct trials under two subdivisions of this jurisdiction. These subsets are ‘Limited Jurisdiction’ and ‘General…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court System in Malaysia

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The two High Courts, the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court are classified as superior courts, while the Magistrates' Courts and the Sessions Courts are classified as the subordinate courts. The High Courts function both as a court of original jurisdiction as well as an appellate court, and are each headed by a Chief Judge (before 1994, Chief Justice). The Chief Judges of Malaya and Sabah and Sarawak are the third and fourth highest positions in Malaysian judiciary after the Chief Justice of the Federal Court(before 1994, the Lord President of the Federal Court) and the President of the Court of Appeal.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays