Autonomy And Beneficence A Framework On Ethical Issues In Nursing
When nursing a fundamentally human science, and considering that the last decades have been characterized by major technological and social changes, the nurse must have a thorough knowledge of ethical science to put it into practice nurse work. It is constantly faced with ethical dilemmas difficult to resolve individually. This should note that the patient wants to become more involved in their own process and the decisions that will affect them. The nurse patient relationship is widening, since in them both factors beyond are involved, such as technical progress. This situation will require the active participation of a team of different professionals to solve problems that arise. This multidisciplinary team would be the ethics committee.
…show more content…
Two of the major components in this respect are the concepts of autonomy and beneficence. Autonomy denotes the right to have the control in the own destiny, to exercise the personal will. Obviously there are limits on how such control can be expressed freely. However, for geriatric purposes, the question revolves around whether the patient is able to assess the situation and make a rational decision independently. This leads to the second concept. The term denotes charitable duty to do good to others, to help them directly and to avoid damage. This idea approaches largely paternalism, in which one becomes the agent of the other in making decisions, just as the parent can do for the child. This approach is in direct conflict with the principle of autonomy. Nurses and doctors are faced with a set of difficult choices in practice when trying to deal with these subtle boundaries. Though often has attacked the medical community for its paternalistic attitude towards patients, usually granted that paternalism is justified when certain criteria are met: if the dangers are prevented and the benefits that accrue in favor of the person outweigh the loss of autonomy stems from the intervention; if the person is too sick to choose freely; and if it is likely that other individuals in similar circumstances would choose the same intervention. Add something important is taking into consideration the culture, beliefs and
Two of the major components in this respect are the concepts of autonomy and beneficence. Autonomy denotes the right to have the control in the own destiny, to exercise the personal will. Obviously there are limits on how such control can be expressed freely. However, for geriatric purposes, the question revolves around whether the patient is able to assess the situation and make a rational decision independently. This leads to the second concept. The term denotes charitable duty to do good to others, to help them directly and to avoid damage. This idea approaches largely paternalism, in which one becomes the agent of the other in making decisions, just as the parent can do for the child. This approach is in direct conflict with the principle of autonomy. Nurses and doctors are faced with a set of difficult choices in practice when trying to deal with these subtle boundaries. Though often has attacked the medical community for its paternalistic attitude towards patients, usually granted that paternalism is justified when certain criteria are met: if the dangers are prevented and the benefits that accrue in favor of the person outweigh the loss of autonomy stems from the intervention; if the person is too sick to choose freely; and if it is likely that other individuals in similar circumstances would choose the same intervention. Add something important is taking into consideration the culture, beliefs and