Preview

Aysha Akhtar Animal Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
383 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aysha Akhtar Animal Testing
One of the most important aspects of animal experimentation is that most of the research is unreliable. According to Aysha Akhtar form the Library of Medicine, “The inability to reproduce the disease in animals so that it is congruent in relevant respects with human stroke has contributed to a high failure rate in drug development. More than 114 potential therapies initially tested in animals failed in human trials” (Akhtar Flaws of Animal Experimentation). If people cannot reproduce the effects of a stroke in an animal, then it is very unlikely that they have come up with other cures for diseases. When there is a high failure rate in drug development, the lives of people are in danger and the lives of animals who were experimented on were
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Leonard Thompson Biography
    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Leonard Thompson Biography

    Scientists are constantly looking for new medical advances that they hope will save people’s lives and often turn to animals as the optimal resource for testing new ideas and products. These animals range from rats and mice to dogs and monkeys. On top of varying animals, the tests they run fluctuate from simply checking the effectiveness of a medicine already in use to testing an entirely new form of treatment. However, there have beens years of controversy over the morality of using animals as the test subjects.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks Summary
    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks Summary

    Diseases that are planted in animals are never identical to the diseases humans face. It’s very unlikely that the research conducted will even be correctly interpreted and applied to humans. Dr. Richard Klausner the former director of the National Cancer Institute said, "We have cured mice of cancer for decades, and it simply didn't work on humans." Since scientist won't readily admit failure, the public doesn't know about the ineffective tests conducted on animals. (Noel Merino) Animal experimentation can be good or bad depending on how it’s viewed.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Travel with Charley Essay. What opinions did John Steinbeck use over the course of his trip across the United States.
    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page

    Travel with Charley Essay. What opinions did John Steinbeck use over the course of his trip across the United States.

    After being on the road for a few months John Steinbeck and his dog Charlie saw much of the U.S. He also gave many opinions and his thoughts on many occasions, such as: mobile homes and how he adored them, Canucks and how they made great soup, and finally the Lonesome Harry episode who was a man cheating on his wife.…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    As a result of this, nine out of every ten trial medicines that look safe and appear to be effective on animals, fail when they are given to humans. Because animals don’t react the same way as humans, not only do the failed tests delay medical progress, but also they are a waste of animal’s lives, and a waste of money that is spent into the research and tests. Animals have different anatomic, cellular, and metabolic structures than humans have. If a new product is passed just because it is safe on animals and isn’t on humans, that could be a very dangerous situation. One instance when this occurred was in 1950 when a sleeping pill worked on animals but when given to humans it caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe birth defects. Another time, a drug for arthritis was safe on mice but when administered to humans caused 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths. Animal testing can make researchers oversea potential cures and treatments. Some substances that are harmful to animals, are helpful to humans. For example, aspirin is dangerous to some animals. Arthur Allen says, “A source of human suffering may be the dozens of promising drugs that get shelved when they cause problems in animals that may not be relevant for humans.” (“Of Mice or Men: The Problems with Animal Testing”). Of all the medicines that pass animal trials and are ready for human…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay Against Animal Testing
    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay Against Animal Testing

    Animal testing is rarely successful since animals have different physiologies than humans. There has been many studies that have shown inaccuracy and unsuccess in animal testing. Studies show, “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials” (Stop Animal Testing) and also, “Animal-tested drugs have killed, disabled or harmed millions of people and lead to costly delays as well” (Stop Animal Testing). It is evident that animal testing lacks accuracy and has dangerous consequences, therefore it should no longer be…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

    ‘’a drug to fight Ebola had showed remarkable success when tested in rhesus monkeys.” (Trull,2015) “More recently, animal research has helped pave the way toward restoring vision.” (Trull,2015.) “ Thanks to the work of scientists and physicians at Duke University, an experimental new treatment for glioblastoma multiforme, or GBM--an aggressive tumor that kills about 12,000 people in the U.S. each year--is saving the lives of patients who, just months ago, had little hope of survival. This extraordinary development wouldn't have been possible without animal research.” (Trull, 2015) However, about 90% of approved animal tested products don’t make it out of the lab, for they don’t work on humans. A lot of testing on animals is unsuccessful, and most of the time when it is, it doesn’t work on humans. This evidence shows that animals are different than humans and testing on them won’t help…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing - 18
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal Testing - 18

    Regulatory agencies across the globe make it mandatory for companies to get their 'products' tested for toxicity before making them available in the market. These 'products', which range from prescription drugs to cosmetics, are tested on animals to check for the degree of skin irritation, skin penetration, eye irritation, carcinogenicity, etc. On the basis of these tests, it is determined whether the said product is fit for human use or not.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Research Paper
    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal Testing Research Paper

    Though many breakthroughs have been made as a result of animal experimentation, many of the drugs that have been approved after animal testing had to be subsequently withdrawn because of harmful side effects. In fact, most experiments done on animals that are nothing like human beings, such as rats and mice. This undermines the dispute that these experiments are a reliable guide to human reactions. Scientifically, as well as morally, most animal experimentation is to be rejected as the reaction of a mouse to a substance is no guide to human reactions. Each species has its own unique…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Flaws
    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing Flaws

    The UDSA reported that in 2010 that there was 97,123 animals that went through pain during experiments and weren’t given anaesthesia for pain relief (“Should animals”). A former Maryland secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene, Martin Wasserman has said “Animals used in chemical testing-always alive and fully concencious-are never given pain relief (“Is animal”). Though, it has been argued that animal testing is better than putting human lives in danger. However, even though products or drugs have been tested on animals it doesn’t work on people. Neurologist Aysha Akktar has said that would about more than 100 stroke drugs that passed animal trials have failed to work on humans (“Should animals”). Proceeding of the National Academy of sciences in the United States studied that around 150 human tests have failed even though it was tested on animals (“Should animals”). In addition to suffering and deaths animals go through the results of animal and human clinics can have different…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Wrong
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

    For centuries, animals have been used in medical research. Since 1875, animal experimentation has been an on going debate on whether experiments…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing

    Is it wrong to experiment on animals for our own benefit? Many may disagree and believe its immoral and shouldnt be done. Science and manufacturing need animal experimentation to prevent harm to humans because it helps to develope cures for disease and to save humans from experimentation.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing
    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal Testing

    Approximately, more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year (Humane Society International, 2010). Animals, from the fruit fly to the mouse, are widely used in scientific research. Research is critical for the advancement of medicine, leading to increased chances of survival from diseases and improved strategies to prevent them. Without animal experiments, transplants, diseases, cancer, and vaccines would not have been advanced. The use of animals can be inevitable, particularly in conditions that require first-hand understanding of biochemical processes in and outside the body. Therefore, animals should be used for scientific research.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Unethical
    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animal Testing Unethical

    Using animals as an alternative to human testing has been a highly controversial topic over the past few decades. With harsh conditions and unethical treatments, the understanding of animal testing is very important. From over-the-counter medications to experiments on cures of chronic illnesses, animals were used in one way or another. Unfortunately, not all experiments given to animals involved a tasty snack or a simple treat. Many experiments involved several incidents of agony and pain without relief. Not knowing the effects that certain experiments have on animals is not only causing pain and suffering of the animals, but also slowing the evolution of these products, wasting money on the production of unethical decisions. Understanding…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are The Arguments Against Animal Testing
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Are The Arguments Against Animal Testing

    Plenty of medical treatments and beneficial procedures have taken place from testing on animals. Humans and animals share many of the same features, so scientists find it best to test the safety and effects of newly made drugs on animals, before testing it on a small group of patients. Operating techniques are also practiced on small animals to perfect the life-saving operations that us humans receive on a daily basis. If we weren’t to use animals for testing, many of the medicines and procedures given would be dangerously unsafe.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing
    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing

    banned. Every day, so many lives are saved by medicine, such as antibiotics, vaccines, etc. However, it has all come at the cost to so many innocent animals which suffer. I believe it is morally reckless to make torturous procedures on animals just so mankind can maybe have less pain. They are part of this world just like us humans. Most of the times, these experiments fail because animals have a different tolerance level from people and even if they fail, the animal is still has to be killed. It is animal abuse that people don’t care about, just to better humans health. Animals are not lab projects, they are living…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics