Preview

Bad Neighbor Policy: Washington's Futile War on Drugs in Latin America"

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3245 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bad Neighbor Policy: Washington's Futile War on Drugs in Latin America"
Book review:

"Bad Neighbor Policy: Washington's futile war on drugs in Latin America"
Edited by Ted Galen Carpenter

Overview

Introduction 3

I Modest results after thirty years of war 4

The war on drugs consequences on the drugs crops cultivation 4
The war on drugs consequences on the Latin American opinion 5

II The American strategy on the drug war: definitively a bad strategy? 8

The United States' strategy on the war on drugs 8
The causes of the American's strategy failure 9

III Is "legalisation" the solution for a decrease in the amount of drug in the united States' streets 12

Conclusion 14

Sources 17

Introduction

"Bad neighbor policy: Washington's futile war on drugs in Latin America", from Ted Galen Carpenter, draws a negative critic (as suggested by the title) of the fight against drugs in United States. Carpenter, who is Vice President for Defence and Foreign Policy studies at the Cato Institute in Washington, gives clearly his negative opinion on what is for him the drug war failure.
This "war" has for purpose to protect the American population against the drug scourge; however this war is mainly set in Latin America. In fact the United States war on drugs began with the entry of Richard Nixon as President in the White house. The year 1968 is marked by the will to eradicate the narcotic problem in United States. Because the supply comes from Latin America, President Nixon decides to cut the supply, by intervening directly in Latin America whether than on the American territory.

The problematic of the book seems to be: What are the consequences of the American war on drugs in Latin America? In fact the consequences on the United States territory are not shown, which should be, considering the conclusion, the purpose of the book.

In this book review, we will in a first part discuss about the global results of this war. Then we will consider the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fbn Vs Anslinger

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A year after the stock market crashed, 1930, and president Hoover is in office, America is in a state of existential crisis and people are looking for answers and distractions. The Treasury Department created the Federal Bureau of Narcotics under Harry J. Anslinger who directed the agency until 1962 “and molded America’s drug policy” (The United States War on Drugs). Anslinger who was also a prohibitionist, who believed progress could only be achieved by controlling each individual’s impulses and thought that if enough people were put in jail that America would rid itself of drugs. Nonetheless, with these same beliefs, Anslinger, used these to fight the war on drugs. Armed with a Depression snug budget, and an uphill battle Anslinger tried and failed to get state governments involved with the war effort.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The response to drug use in America and in some countries around the world seems to have an interesting history. As the author Daniel Patrick Moynihan describes the unintended consequences society faces when government does not deal effectively with issues of drugs in society. He provided several references that shows the historical and present connections to government interrelations and how many of these decisions have some form of negative impact and at times causes social breakdown. His historical reference to drug uses, medicinal properties as well as technology role in our present age does paint a vivid picture of how government decisions can affect us. Since the article was a bit difficult to follow in the beginning and kept discussing historical and current events, I had to focus on the relevance of what was happening then, now and probably what will happen in the future if our government does not address the pros and cons of dangerous drugs, technology and how not addressing these issues can lead to societal breakdown.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 2 of The New Jim Crow focuses on how the system of mass incarceration works. Alexander concentrates on the "War on Drugs," because "convictions for drug offenses are the single most important cause of the explosion in incarceration rates in the United States." Early on, she exposes myths, noting that the war is not "aimed at ridding the nation of drug 'kingpins' or big-time drug dealers," and the drug war is not "principally concerned with dangerous drugs" (60).…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Failed States and Failed Policies: How to Stop the Drug Wars." The Economist 5 Mar. 2009: n. pag. Web.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although Richard Nixon first declared a “war on drugs” in 1971, the war escalated during the Reagan presidency and shifted its focus from treatment toward incarceration and law enforcement. As George Moss and Evan Thomas explain, Reagan came to Washington “committed to waging a war on drugs and bringing the international drug trade under control” in 1981. Thanks to the rise of the Medellin Cartel in Colombia and other cartels in Latin America during the 1980s, illegal drug trade networks flourished, and America became “the world’s major consumer of illicit drugs.” This increased usage of drugs led to many social crises, including heightened urban crime and health problems, which encouraged both the Reagan administration and private groups…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    drugs in americas paper 1

    • 1262 Words
    • 1 Page

    How is it possible that America, the strongest country in the world, cannot rid the use and sale of illegal drugs? First, we must take a look at what their policy includes. The Drug Wars’ “primary aim is to prohibit supply, so that Americans cannot find or cannot afford drugs to use; its secondary aim is to discourage those who do consume drugs, mainly by penalizing them,” (Bertram, pg. 3.) Still, with this policy and its lack of achievement, we deny any true change. “Despite a decline in casual drug use since the late 1970’s, and despite the billions of dollars spent to fight the drug war, the number of people suffering drug use or addiction, the level of violent drug-related crime, and the spread of diseases linked to drug…

    • 1262 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Silver or Lead

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Our government tries to fight too much from the wrong side as Javdani tells us “In an attempt to find the quickest way around a complicated problem, each year the United States sends billions in aid dollars every year to the governments of Latin American ‘drug source’ countries” (403). This statement by Javdani shows just how lopsided the war on drugs is. Our government believes if we bring the fight to the source, we can stop the drugs from coming into our country and therefore win the drug war. As Javdani tells us, this is not the best approach as most landowners in these Latin American countries do not have a choice of whether or not their land is cultivated for drugs. Drug lords control vast areas of these Latin American countries with impunity. Our aid dollars and military equipment are not enough for these governments to secure the country sides for their citizens, lack of training and support for law enforcement combined with widespread government corruption ensure that the majority of our aid dollars to these countries fail to stop the drug flow.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prohibition In The 1920's

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This online article talks about the similarities between the prohibition and the War on Drugs. It offers theories about why the war on drugs continues to be waged and states that it is primarily due to the stubbornness of the United States government. They bring up the fact that many high profile individuals and politicians have used illegal drugs yet they still support the war. They also bring up the financial burden that came along with prohibition and point out that the same burden is being placed on us nearly 80 years later yet…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Americans in the United States face the war on drugs, we struggle to get a grip on the killer of a nation. It seems as if illegal narcotics are killing and destroying families at an alarming rate. Since the early eighties, children have dropped out of school to make a profit from this dream killer. Many parents were either addicted to these illegal drugs, or in denial of their corruption. In many legal cases you hear the convicted say, “We don’t have poppy fields in North America,” which leads our government to do critical speculation. Where do these drugs come from? How are they entering our states and destroying families? These are the questions that many have. Upon research, it has become clear that the Mexican Cartels are the main and biggest contributors to the narcotic empire. Pushing illegal drugs from Mexico through the border of Lerado, Mexico and Lerado, Texas has been the success of these cartels in distributing drugs into the United States. Government officials face the horror of senseless deaths as the fight for War on Drugs begins.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: The Mexican president Felipe Calderón’s war on drugs has seen some progress, but it has come at a heavy price to the people who live there and the neighboring countries.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war on drugs utilized “tough on crime” rhetoric to create legislation that kept African-American men in a second-class role in American society. In the late 60’s, the Nixon administration was the first presidency to vocally declare a “war on drugs”: targeting drug use and distribution with new “tougher” policies and legislation punishing drug users. Although at the time many Americans praised the war on drugs for bringing awareness of drug use and its impact on crime, the war on drugs has been criticized for its annihilation of black communities. In an interview, Nixon aide John Ehrlichmann confessed that, "The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon white house after that, had 2 enemies: the antiwar left and black people...by getting the…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1970's Drug Abuse

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the attempts of the United States to stop influx of smuggled marijuana from Mexico was under “Operation Intercept” in 1969. The operation was made because of belief that Marijuana was being streamlined into the United States from Mexico and it was to blame. This policy of supply drug control is one that the United States adopted for many countries. The United States adopted a policy of containment rather than treatment. Another strategy used by the United States was the aerial spraying of drug crops in Mexico. Both the success in Operation Intercept and in aerial eradication were short lived as more crops and drugs would be cultivated again and replaced. The main reason for these policies that were more offensive toward other countries, rather than reflective, was because politicians during this time believed getting rid of the drugs at the cultivations source would be the least costly option rather than brainstorming on plans to improve the citizens back home who were losing themselves more to poverty and misery due to the consumption of drugs. Also most of the aid that was budgeted for the United States to use on the attempt to diminish drug trafficking abroad was not used to fund international organizations against drugs. Only 3 percent of this budget…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war on drugs has been going on for over thirty years. It does not appear that a lot of progress has been made. If the United States were fighting any other war, this long, with these results, they would change direction. The United States current drug policy has consumed tens of billions of dollars and ruined countless lives. According to Unitarian Universalists for Drug Policy Reform (2006), "The costs of this policy include the increasing breakdown of families, escalating rates of incarceration, political corruption, and the imposition of United States policy abroad. For United States taxpayers, the price tag on the drug offensive has soared from sixty six million in 1968 to…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legalization of the drug can be argued on many levels both good and bad, but in the end it weighs down to the realization that this could actually be a good thing and an answer for America’s economy.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The estimated total of funding from the government has come close to almost $1.4 trillion dollars (Editorial; Nixon's drug war still hurts the poor). For more than forty years, America has funded efforts to suppress the importation of illegal drugs and has had little to no success. Looking at the outcomes of this war, the results are hundreds of thousands innocents dead in other foreign countries. As in Mexico alone, the total rate of homicides was estimated to 11 per 100,000 individuals in 2005; by 2010, it was 18.5 per 100,000 individuals (Enamorado). The effects of the domestic war on drugs is spilling into other countries as a power struggle for who will gain control of the large US market. If marijuana was legal, this effect would no longer be relevant. Individuals would be less likely to seek out and buy the drug for recreational use through illegal…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics