Banning Genetic Engineering

Weston argues that “it’s our responsibility to seek out the facts-honestly and persistently” (pg. 233). The topic of genetic engineering has made for a discomforting discussion between many conservatives and liberals. My own view is that genetic engineering should be banned because I feel it’s extremely unethical to use biomedical technologies to eradicate those with unfavorable disabilities, and predetermine one’s destiny. At this point in time, its safety and reliability are extremely questionable. It has the possibility to trigger unintended immune responses that may cause some genes to no longer be functional or to mutate into gene patterns that could potentially be harmful. Some might argue that the promotion of genetic engineering
He claims to “Always act so as to treat humanity, whether in yourself or in another, and an end and never merely as a means” (pg. 126). Kant’s theory deals with absolute rules. He would not be interested in the benefits of genetic engineering, but instead he would be attentive to the actions involved in the process. He might ask whether there was principally anything wrong with embryonic stem-cell research, versus a utilitarian questioning the benefits of the research. By having the ability to alter or delete certain conditions such as Down Syndrome, Autism, and ADHD it poses the question, are we curing or eliminating it by eradicating people with this disorder? It would be as if we were treating people not only as a means of curing them,
He asked, “If you had the ability to delete your gluten intolerance from your genetic code, would you do it?” That was a tough question. It has been almost 13 years since I have been diagnosed with Celiac Disease. Celiac Disease is an autoimmune disorder where the consumption of gluten causes damage to the small intestines, and maybe even related to the development of colon cancer. I was gluten free before it became a national fad, and I have strictly followed the diet all 13 years. All individuals with Celiac Disease are born with a genetic predisposition to have the full blown disease and at any point in your life (from infancy to old age) the gene can stay dormant until it is triggered. Since Celiac Disease is hereditary, the chances that one or more of my children will inherit it are very high. Going back to the proposed question, I believe if I had the choice, I would not delete that trait. It is a healthier lifestyle (although it is more expensive) than the average gluten diet and it can be managed by making the correct substitutions in your diet. I remember from an early age seeing a confused expression on someone’s face when I would go to a restaurant and ask, “Is this item gluten free?” or “Is there any cross-contamination of gluten items in your kitchen?” Now many grocery stores and restaurants make the necessary accommodations to the gluten