Originally Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) was called Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), but was changed to (DID) because (MPD) made it sound like there were multiple people living in one body. The name change corrected this theory. One controversy surrounding this disorder is that the person suffering may be faking the illness to avoid stress. It is difficult to answer this question because people with this problem may seem or act questionable because the therapist may ask certain leading questions either during therapy or while the client is being hypnotized. Some cases have also shown that therapists can plant false memories in clients. The client actually believes the incident that happened …show more content…
Fourteen of the inmates met the DSM-IV criteria for Dissociate Identity Disorder (DID). Psychology professionals were able to retrieve documentation of childhood abuse by friends, family, and other Mental Health Professionals. Eleven of the fourteen cases showed signs of (DID). Some of the murderers couldn't remember anything about the childhood abuse they suffered and weren't even aware that they had a psychiatric condition. The mental health professionals were leery of asking leading questions because they were afraid of putting false memories in the client's heads. This was mentioned in the textbook as well. I think this is why (DID) is such a difficult illness to diagnose. Something I don't agree with is that it would seem that everyone who has had an abusive childhood or other trauma will end up having (DID). This doesn't seem correct. I had a very abusive childhood, but it didn't affect my mental status growing up. I think some people who commit crimes know what they did was wrong, but try to use Abnormal Psychology to get out of what they did. Both the textbook and article helped me to understand what this illness should or shouldn't