However, this business model is in clear violation of the U.S. antitrust laws which therefore prohibited De Beers from selling directly in the U.S. market. However, De Beers wanted to maintain its profitable monopoly position by taking control of the key mines, forging close ties with diamond producing countries and taking control of the entire industry value chain. There are Political, Economic, Social and Technical (PEST) factors that are in favour of and against De Beers’ position as the dominant player. Several factors that threatened the company are US Antitrust laws, constant political turmoil in diamond producing states and the changing stakeholders of companies. On the other hand, some factors that supported the company’s position are the strong brand of De Beers, the surging diamond sales in US market and policy to support reconstruction and development of Africa. If anything is certain, it is change and diamond industry has transformed as De Beers begins to lose its grip on the market in the events such as Russian and Angolan defection, as well as Asian Crisis. As a…