Preview

Bartolomeo Vanzetti Guilty

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bartolomeo Vanzetti Guilty
In recent discussions of Sacco and Vanzetti, a controversial issue has been whether or not the two men are innocent or guilty. On the one hand, some argue that they are innocent. From this perspective, there was little evidence to support the verdict. On the other hand, however, others argue that they were guilty. From this perspective, there are letters that were recently released that link them to the crime. In the words of Bartolomeo Vanzetti, “I am convinced that the human history has yet begun, that we find ourselves in the last period of the prehistoric. I see with the eyes of my soul how the sky is diffused with the rays of the new millennium” (Vanzetti). According to this view, Vanzetti and Sacco were executed due to the fact …show more content…
They believe that they are guilty because Vanzetti lied about the whereabouts of his friends and guns. Not only this, but he also lied about the reason he was in Bridgewater on May 5th. He stated that he had gone there to collect anarchist literature, but could not give names of anyone he went to see that day or the addresses of the places that he went. Many prosecutors believed that this was a weak explanation. With all these lies building up it started to show “consciousness of guilt.” However, I do not think that slips of the tongue or little white lies are evidence to convict and execute the two men. During the court case Vanzetti eventually told the truth. He testified, saying that he did tell lies about his gun and whereabouts because the United States was in the grip of a Red Scare. He feared for his life, of course he is not going to fully tell the truth if he thinks it will get him or his friends in some type of trouble. Aside from clearing up the lies about his guns/friends, he still stuck to his original story about why he was in Bridgewater. Defense attorney Moore started to look into the case after Vanzetti's execution. He thinks that Vanzetti had gone to Bridgewater with Sacco to pick up a car from Boda's so they could collect dynamite. Moore thinks that Vanzetti told the lie because if he had told the truth about going to collect dynamite it would have been pretty …show more content…
I personally believe that even though it is almost one hundred years since this trial ended, we as American's still have not moved past using race, religion, or social status in our justice system. If you look into the OJ Simpson trial the exact same thing was happening. Everyone was focused on the fact that he was African American and famous. That should not have been a factor in his case or in Sacco and Vanzetti's case. They were innocent. If someone believes they are guilty, they are too focused on the lies that were cleared, the witnesses that were too far away to see, and the jury and prosecutors that were prejudiced against Italian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    On April 15th, 1920 in South Braintree, Massachusetts, a robbery right outside the Slater-Morrill shoe factory took place. Two men carrying the payroll boxes outside were shot and killed. The robbers retrieved the boxes and sped off in a getaway car, firing wildly at nearby company workers. To this day, it is undetermined who the robbers are. However, two men were tried and convicted: Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Unfortunately, both these men suffered the immense pain and mortality of the electric chair. Injustice within the courts, panic during the Red Scare, and influence of the media all impacted the punishments faced by Sacco and Vanzetti.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bartolomeo Vanzetti Case

    • 3135 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The murder case of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti is one of the most discriminatory and controversial trials to prevail throughout the history of Massachusetts’ courts. On July 14th, 1921, Sacco and Vanzetti were wrongfully found guilty of first degree murder; not because there was ample evidence suggesting they were guilty, but because of their political beliefs. When Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested in 1920 (“The Sacco & Vanzetti Trial: A Chronology” p.2) many nations were undergoing major political changes and how the government and the people reacted to these changes affected Sacco and Vanzetti’s case. Americans feared people with extreme political views in their country, and believed that all radicals were plotting…

    • 3135 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the defendant's testimony and some of their alibis, they did not commit the crimes, The jury voted 10-2 finding them guilty. They were just two immigrants trying to get freedom here in the United States, but their freedom ended. Some say that they were guilty of the crime while others say they were guilty because of their beliefs. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were two Italian anarchists who were found guilty of armed robbery and murder in a trial and conviction that incited protests around the world and has been questioned every since their sentence was handed…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacco-Vanzetti Case

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "While many Americans were enjoying economic prosperity during the 1920s, there was also increasing social conflicts." Assess the validity of this statement with reference to Ku Klux Klan, fundamentalism and Sacco and Vanzetti case.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However the jury did find him not guilty meaning the defense lawyers had to have instilled enough doubt into their minds to make them unable to say without a reasonable doubt. As I mentioned one of the biggest moments of the trial is Simpson trying on the glove and it not fitting. This was huge for instilling doubt in the jurors’ minds. A big theme throughout this case was racism. This is mentioned in an article titled 20 years after the killings: How O.J. Simpson got off, according to local legal pros. He interviewed a veteran lawyer named Bob Beyer who believed the case basically turned into a racial case. The jury had nine African Americans on it and if they were on Simpson’s side, the glove not fitting would be a perfect point for them. The Rodney King case three years earlier is mentioned and how the LAPD was a racist police department. This is a big point because the defense claimed that Detective Mark Fuhrman planted the glove to frame Simpson and if the jury thinks that the police could be racist they are going to believe this. Another big piece of evidence pointing towards Simpson was the sock with Nicole’s blood on it found at his house. However, the defense argued that this too was planted. Stating that the blood was smeared on the socks in the lab. This is a big deal because blood had soaked through to the other side. This would not be possible if there was a foot in it. Later on Fuhrman was charged for perjury because of his testimony on how he collected evidence. This would really hurt the prosecution because now it shows they had a bad witness and could make them think other evidence was tampered with. Simpson was also a huge star and loved by the people of LA and this could have also had a big impact on their decision. The trial probably should not have been done in LA due to a possible bias of Simpson’s fame there. Another big thing is that the prosecutors…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    These were not speedy trials, so those who were accused of a crime often languished in prison awaiting their trial and ultimately, their fate. This gave them time to reflect on their upcoming punishment or execution. If they were sentenced to death, not only were these individuals going to be executed, but they were also forced to contribute to the spectacle of their death. For example, criminals “were driven from the prison to their deaths sitting with their coffins” (Executions 1). Such a thing would be considered by most as a further insult to injury. In particular the last words of nine different individuals will be examined in the paragraphs below. In order to properly convey these accounts in a historical context we will discuss the individuals in chronological order beginning with the year 1708 and ending with the year 1793, illustrating…

    • 2969 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom 302

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A very significant case in Cook County Courts was the Bridgeport case, known as a “heater” case because of the publicity that surround it, and the racial overtones (Bogira 181). The Bridgeport case involved three white teenagers, Michael Kwidzinski, Jasas, and Caruso that were accused of brutally beating two young black boys who were riding their bikes in the predominantly white neighborhood. The entire summary of the case, in Courtroom 302, was based around the fact that one of the boys, Michael Kwidzinski, was most likely innocent. The question then turns to the boy himself, Michael Kwidzinski; if he was innocent, why did hid then accept a guilty plea bargain?…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both of the men never had any criminal records before they were guilty but, when Sacco and Vanzetti went to Mexico to flee…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Witch Trials DBQ

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Document E shows us that thirty-two out of thirty-four accusers lived on the west side of town. This would mean that almost all of the accused lived on the east side of town. According to the note on Document E, the people living on the east side of town tended to be more affluent and had more political power. In the contrast, the accusers that lived on the west side had very little to no wealth, and they had no political power. This evidence helps explain the hysteria because it shows that loss of wealth and power can cause resentment. Resentment can easily lead to accusation, and can cause one’s children to make false…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the song, it had all been decided before hand. The District Attorney (D.A.) was “[practicing] all his lines in the mirror.” He knew what the outcome was going to be, and so did everybody else. They must’ve all “read the morning paper, The headline [read] “the man hangs” but the jury doesn’t.” The D.A. doesn’t have to say anything to convince the jury over- a hung jury is an undecided jury-they agree with what the newspaper says. The man is already hung. Just like in TKAM, Tom Robinson had no chance to win. But even if some of the jury isn’t convinced-Mr. Cunningham-the Prosecutor can just “pay to close it like a casket.” Even the witness is payed off he is, “Too well dressed for the witness stand” AKA he just got new clothes. Hmm, maybe a new paycheck?? The defendant has no chance, he either “[Hangs] on a rope, or bated breath.” The death penalty will be served, or the suspense will end him. Game over. To add to the injustice of this case “The press prays for whichever headline is worse.” The accused has nothing going for him. The jury, either they get payed to vote against him, or they agree with the Prosecutor. The witness already got payed off to say the ‘right’ thing; and the press just doesn’t care-unless it will help them sell papers. That dude couldn’t catch a break. The 5 minorities arrested had DNA proof-DNA that is I believe 100% accurate, they were innocent and no amount of arguing could prove it another way-yet they still were convicted. Tom Robinson had the 1930’s version of DNA proof, yet he stood no chance at being…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First, it's not physically possible for Tom to have committed the crime. He was accused of using his bad arm in a powerful way, and the fact is, he can hardly even lift it, much less use of it to harm somebody. Second, this is the kind of town where everybody knows about everybody else. Everyone has known Tom and Mayella for a long time, and we all know that Mayella does not have a reputation for being honest in kind. On the other hand, Tom never hurt anybody. He is a decent man who always worked as hard as he could. Third, we are all proud to be Americans. We are not like Hitler. We believe in truth and democracy. If we lie in an American court of law, we might as well go to Europe and join Hitler's army. Over there, they send people to death…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trayvon Martin

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people reacted with so many emotions because this trial was a voice for the many killings and other crimes that happen daily but aren’t recognized by the police or justice system. This trial could have been an opportunity for the black community, specifically to get the lawfulness that they rightfully deserve. Some may say that this trial is not a reflection upon race but in reality it is because George Zimmerman brought race into it when he was on the phone with the 911 operator. After identifying and telling the 911 operator that Trayvon was black, Zimmerman stated that “these assholes always get away”. By categorizing Trayvon, a black male, as an asshole and saying these, race became apart of the trial. After hearing the recording, people were outraged that race wasn’t brought up in this trial because George Zimmerman clearly showed signs of outrage toward the “black assholes” and he felt the need to make sure they don’t get away again. Why was Zimmerman able to get away with what I would describe as a hate crime because he pursued Trayvon after realizing that he was black? If our justice was for equality then race would have been brought up during the trial, but once again it was not and a murderer was able to walk. This demonstrates how our justice…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Convictions

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    in who goes to prison. Weak and fabricated evidence is seldom looked at in the eyes of the…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The accusation process of a crime is often very tedious and at times misleading, but with careful analyzation the true culprit can be revealed. Such an instance occurs in Gabriel García Márquez's journalistic novel, Chronicle of a Death Foretold, in which Santiago Nasar is indicted of having been the individual responsible for deflowering Angela Vicario prior to her arranged marriage to Bayardo San Roman. This accusation, which is initially stated by Angela Vicario herself, causes a chain of events which ultimately result in the murder of Santiago Nasar by Pedro and Pablo Vicario, Angela’s brothers. Through their actions, the twins act for honor with the intention of freeing their sister of her dishonorable past. After the murder, many townspeople…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays