Preview

Bear Hunts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
406 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bear Hunts
Nearly all Black Bears outside of National Parks die from human related causes. Killing for necessities is understandable, but hunting as a sport is murder. The state of New Jersey has conducted two annual bear hunts, two times where innocent animals were murdered. A state bear hunt disrupts animal rights, punishes bears for human actions, and is an inhumane sport; therefore, the New Jersey government should not allow anymore state bear hunts. There is no doubt that animal rights are greatly disrupted in a state bear hunt. In fact, the New Jersey Department of Environment Protection starts that 120 out of 182 bears killed (66%) one day on a bear hunt were females, and generally no more than 35-45% of female bears should be killed. "When the proportion of the female kill exceeds 40%, there is a danger that the population is being over exploited. Continuing this hunt may cause long-term irreparable harm to the population." In fact, humans are as much to blame for all the bears in the area as the bears themselves. Bear generally avoid humans, but pet food, garbage, bird feeders and barbecue grills attract them. Once bears find food they will likely return for more, so citizens should bear-proof, not bear-hunt. Additionally, bear attacks are uncommon. Most encounters are because the bears are surprised, protecting their young, or following food odors. An effective way to get rid of a bear if encountered is to use bear spray, spray that produces and odor only bears can smell, which will make the bear leave. Equally important is the fact that bear hunting is an inhumane sport. The New Jersey division of Fish and Wildlife stated that the purpose of a bear hunt was to reduce human/bear conflicts but later called it a "sport hunt". With this in mind, bears are still listed as a game species. In a Delaware bear hunt, the National Part Service failed to set limits on how many hunters can hunt and how many bears can be killed. Unquestionable, this caused a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As stated earlier, the 2004-2005 survey conducted by the Wisconsin DNR showed that 52 percent of Wisconsin citizens do not support compensation for hounds, yet the money from these citizens is still used to provide compensation to the hunter. The same survey discovered that 81 percent of landowners that live near wolf packs would participate in a program in which they are given a monetary incentive to protect wolves, which would offset the risks they face and compensate them for any potential animal losses. This proves that wolves are not the problem; the problem is how the compensation is funded and handled. During the 2012 Wisconsin wolf hunting season, the compensation for dog depredations was provided through wolf application fees instead of taxpayer dollars. Managing the wolf population not only involves hunting, but also dealing with the consequences and side effects of having a wolf population in the state of Wisconsin. The money that was earned from wolf hunting application fees during 2012 was used directly to compensate hunters for wolves that caused them problems, which was a much more beneficial management…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although regulated by laws, the tribe retained their tradition values and maintained their tribal autonomy as they continue to govern themselves through tradition. Within duty, justice plays a key role in the in the re-established hunting process. The justice system in this scenario protect all parties involved. The hunters are protected by laws allowing the hunt, The whales are protected by limiting the number of kills allowed, and the environmentalists are protected under personal liberties and guaranteed…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bear Hunt Research Paper

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first hour and a half we listened to the birds and watched the squirrels eat away at the trail mix. The sight of this made me hungry so I got out my peanut butter sandwich and red Gatorade. Around 4:45, I was lightly sleeping when I heard a loud snap from a few hundred yards away. My mind began racing as I tried to figure out what could have made that noise. Every couple minutes I could hear another branch break and it was getting closer and closer. An hour later the noise had moved from a few hundred yards in front of us to less than 30 yards behind us. “Don’t move” my dad whispered. We could hear leaves crunching under the feet of whatever was behind us. The noise continued onto the path that leads right to the bait pile. I slowly turned my head to the left and saw a 325-pound bear with a furry, black coat. Instantly my breathing became heavy, my whole body was shaking and my heart was about to pound out of my chest. I grabbed by gun and raised it to my shoulder, almost dropping it from all my shaking. I rested my Remington pump shotgun on the chilly aluminum edge of the Rivers Edge tree stand. “Click” I took the safety off of my shotgun and looked down the iron sights. The bear was licking the frosting on top of the white cedar log. BANG! The bear spun and took off into the thick green underbrush and fell after 20 yards. I couldn’t believe it; I was so excited. My dad and I waited 30 minutes and then we got down from the tree stand and followed the trail to where the bear was laying. I reached down and touched the smooth, plush coat of the bear, thanking it for the meat it would provide for my…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bear attacks are rare, however, in bear-country areas where humans and bears coexist such as British Columbia (BC), the encounters are nearly inevitable. This study looks at newspaper articles on grizzly and black bear attacks on humans in BC and analyses an spatial or temporal trends from 2000-2016. The data showed that grizzlies had a higher attack rate of 18 attacks/10,000 individuals than black bears with 1.9 attacks. 10,000 individuals. Females with cubs also showed to have the highest frequency in attacks within the last 16 years. The locations of these attacks were quite variable with minimal patterns, however, generally, grizzly bear attacks occurred in the backcountry while black bear attacks ensued more in the front country with greater…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources while honoring our various heritage, cultures, and tribal communities as well as supplies the energy of the future. The primary focus is within the Fish and Wildlife Service of the Federal Government. The existence of wildlife and plants is constantly threatened as a direct result of humanity. Global Warming is finally receiving acknowledgement necessary to make a difference in the wasteful and destructive routines of human expansion. Artic wildlife is experiencing the most difficulties as the surrounding glaciers are all melting. Our primary focus is on polar bears as they rely on masses of ice to rest after hunting for food. With the emergence of warmer climate, the areas of ice are diminishing leaving polar bears swimming for even longer until they drown from exhaustion. A federal regulation was passed in May of 2008 to protect the polar bear species from extinction by adding them to the endangered list. This should be a wake-up call to every individual living on the planet Earth as it is time to take responsibility for our actions and start making serious changes. Continued decrease of sea ice levels is expected in the future which affects the entire span of polar bears which reclassifies their status as threatened and endangered.…

    • 2559 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem with offering money is that some ranchers have accepted it, but used that money to pay hunters to kill as many wolves as possible (nytimes, 2011). Ranchers do not believe that it is necessary to keep wolf populations as high as they are (nytimes, 2011). The fourth article discussed how the court was going to uphold Congress’s act to remove the wolf from the endangered species list (latimes, 2012). The main viewpoints are the agencies that support Congress’s decision to take the wolf off the list versus the environmental groups (latimes, 2012). The environmental groups were arguing that the rider that Congress issued in 2011 was a violation of the separation of powers doctrine (latimes, 2012). However, it was revealed that the separation of powers doctrine was not violated and that states should still get the rights to determine wolf population numbers (latimes, 2012). In the fifth article, state governments versus environmental groups are the main viewpoints (nytimes, 2013). State governments believe that they are the most competent to make decisions about the future of wolves (nytimes, 2013). Reports indicate that wolf populations remain…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who have never hunted or are too squimmish to harvest for their own may conseive that hunting is cruel and excrutiating for wildlife. However, the dudy of a hunter is to end its life quickly and harvest the animal. To achieve this task the hunter will pratice his marksmanship and utalize his equipment to ensure that his prey ends humainely as possible. This way of death is a lot better than the slaughterhouses and what mother nature can offer.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bird feeders, compost, garbage, vegetables and fruits such as sweet corn and apples, and pet foods. Chicken coops and beehives also often attract bears. Humans living near forests with any of these easily accessible should not be surprised to spot a bear lurking in their yard. However, there are preventative measures people can take to reduce the chances of running into a bear at home. Getting rid of all bird feeders, for one, at least while bears are active. It is also wise to make sure all trash and compost piles are secured. People with livestock, crops, or beehives should use means such as electrical fencing to keep out…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    You’re driving home from a movie with your best friends and you’re doing about 60 on a country road you’ve known all your life. All of a sudden, out of your peripheral view, you see a couple of deer heading straight for your cars path. You hit the brake to try to avoid them and narrowly miss. You think to yourself how lucky you are that you didn’t hit one. What you didn’t know is the couple of deer you saw used to be a pack of 4 deer. A week earlier, two different hunters each took a deer from that herd. If it wasn’t for the hunters, you probably would’ve hit at least one deer. Deer hunting isn’t as bad as it is portrayed to be! Hunting controls the deer population and along with predator population and the number of accidents involving deer decrease because of good ethical hunting.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ 61 people have been killed by black bears while hundreds of black bears have been killed by hunters in New Jersey” Does the bear hunt really matter that much? The bear hunt isn’t necessary, and some people may not believe this but it doesn’t change anything. The bears will just keep on growing so why should we murder them for no reason while there are other ways to prevent them from hurting our people. Hunting black bears is a horrendous sport which lets hunters get lots of money for doing something wrong. When has murdering and torturing animals become a sport? What have the bears ever done to us or the hunters? They kill people because they are terrified of us. It is not their fault. When people are terrified they do the same thing. We should end the bear hunt because when we hurt bears that is…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The activity of hunting wild animals for food has long been a practice of man. It is what we as humans survived off for thousands of years. An instinctual need to pursue game is still alive in many of us. Unfortunately, those who choose to fulfill this instinct are generally condemned for their actions. Now this may not seem to be such a serious deal, but I assure you there is much more to this situation than first meets the eye. The topic of hunting is very significant because it not only affects hunter’s rights, but it affects landscape, funding wildlife preservation, and tradition.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Hunting Essay

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Public debates about trophy hunting often centers on the question of the morality of recreational hunting or the extent to which the money paid by sportsmen seeking a trophy animal provides a conservation benefit to the overall population of game animals and the rural economies where the game is hunted. Bears, cougars, deer, foxes, and other animals who are chased, trapped, and even killed by dogs during hunts are not the only ones to suffer from this variant of the “sport.” Hunting for fun destroys property and injure or kill horses, cows, dogs, cats, hikers, and other hunters (Trophy…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many animals endure prolonged, painful deaths when they are injured but not killed by hunters. What the author fails to consider is that most people that hunt are not hunting to just kill most are trying to feed there family or put meat in there fridge. According to peta the delicate balance of ecosystems ensures their survival if they are left unaltered. Natural predators help maintain this balance by killing only the sickest and weakest individuals. Hunters, however, kill any animal whose head they would like to hang over the fireplace including large, healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong. Although this may be true the ecosystem is going to kill off populations a lot slower than kill animals such as deer are self, killing isn't bad if you using the deer for good causes.On private lands that are set up as for-profit hunting reserves or game ranches, hunters can pay to kill native and exotic species in “canned hunts.” This is true, but people that go out and hunt in canned hunts usually after they kill a deer they give the meat to share your harvest and help families in need.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    All animals should have the right to roam freely without being pursued and/or killed. Hunters cause injuries, pain and suffering to defenseless animals, they destroy their families and home, and leave…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is disheartening that even after the passage of many decades, and much scientific evidence to support Leopold’s contention that wolf predation is critical to ecological integrity, state wildlife agencies like…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics