Preview

BeckerKevinE2Phil100F2014

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1326 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
BeckerKevinE2Phil100F2014
Kevin Becker
Phil 100 Fall 2014
November 17th, 2014 “The Empiricists: the importance of experience in the works of John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume”

Empiricism, or the belief that knowledge is achieved through the senses, was a popular belief amongst some of the greatest modern philosophers. Perhaps the most prominent Empiricists were John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume, all of whom are regarded as some of the most influential philosophers of the last 500 years. Each of those philosophers can be considered Empiricists due to the importance of experience throughout their philosophical principles. More specifically, Locke's empirical views can be seen in his idea of the primary and secondary qualities of an object. Berkeley's empiricism is evident in his critique of Locke's concept of abstract ideas. Lastly, Hume can be considered as the most consistent empiricist of the group as he did not waver from experience being the source of knowledge and at the root of reasoning. His views are evident in his concept of humans having perceptions and impressions and his idea of “self”.

John Locke's empirical views are evident throughout his philosophical principles. Locke believed that there were no such things as innate thoughts and that the only way a person could obtain knowledge about something is through directly experiencing it. This is especially evident in his explanation of objects having primary and secondary qualities. Locke suggests that all things posses two qualities about them: primary qualities and secondary qualities. Primary qualities consist of traits that are completely within the object such as the shape of a ball. This primary quality about the ball will not change even when viewed from a different perspective because that is the physical structure of the ball. On the contrary, a secondary quality is a trait that requires perception by an observer. Secondary qualities are relative to the observer and change depending on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Locke, primary qualities are measurable by the mind, thus they are independent of perception. The primary qualities of an object are the features it really has, including its solidity, size, extension, figure, motion, number, etc. In contrast, secondary qualities are objects that are not measurable of the mind, and thus they are perception dependent. Secondary qualities include the ideas it produces for color, smell, sound, taste, etc. Locke claims that our sensations of primary qualities resemble the properties of the object we perceive. However, our sensations of secondary qualities don’t resemble the object at…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    AP Psych units 1-3

    • 7545 Words
    • 31 Pages

    In Brittain, Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was fascinated by the human mind and it’s failings. Novum Organuum- our mind’s desire to perceive patterns in random events. John Locke (1632-1704) author of An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, argued that the human mind at birth is a blank slate, which is then developed by experiences. Locke’s and Bacon’s ideas cooperatively formed empiricism, the idea that knowledge is based off of experience.…

    • 7545 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From dates back to the early 1200's to the mid 1650's, Empiricists were all about experiments. Robert Bacon, and Early Empiricist, believed that experience is superior to argument (which could come from long accepted theories), and that experience science is a valid route to truth, making observation key to science. Priestley says in his article, "That this was not the case, I attribute to the force of prejudice, which, unkown to ourselves, biasses not only our judgments, properly so called, but even the perceptions of our senses: for we may take a maxim so strongly for granted, that the plainest evidence of sense will not intirely change, and often hardly modify our persuasions; and the more ingenious a man is, the more effectually he is entangled in his errors; his ingenuity only helping him to deceive himself, by evading the force of truth." He's stating that many people overlook simple observations and facts (or truths) because they believe in theories and biasses. He believes that an ingenious man is deceiving himself by distancing himself from the…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Locke believed that knowledge was only gained through worldliness. He told people that experiences caused them to learn. One famous this he argued is that, “at birth the mind is a tabula rasa”3. Tabula rasa translates to “clean slate”. Essentially, everyone is born without knowledge and over time they become wiser and smarter. This was revolutionary because previously no one had every stopped to think about how knowledge was gained other than schooling. Locke was the first to think that people were born without any knowledge. He emphasized the five senses as well. Humans fill their clean slate with ideas and experience in the world through their five senses. There are many varying definitions of knowledge, but John Locke is the most accurate. Locke defines knowledge as “the connection and agreement, or disagreement and repugnancy, of the ideas humans form”4. Since our knowledge is derived from our experiences, it means our knowledge is limited. Not everyone can know everything since not one single person can experience everything this earth has to offer in one lifetime. This also means that everyone’s knowledge varies and no two people have the same exact knowledge since everyone’s experiences are different. Locke also notes that there is a great deal of unknown on this world and there always will be. This observation still is true today because there is a great deal of uncertainty in today’s society. He is also still influential because he taught us to question those uncertain areas. As a continuation, he agrees that there are certain things that we are certain of. One example that Locke uses is the certainty of our own existence and the existence of God even tough we may not fully comprehend who or what he was5. Another very complex theory that he had relating to the idea of knowledge was our ideas are related to reality. He said that, “our ideas…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    BeckerKevinE1Phil100F2014

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Thales' Influence on philosophy; how a solar eclipse managed to shed new light on philosophical thought”…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PSYCH 102 Chapter Outline

    • 10896 Words
    • 49 Pages

    Francis Bacon (1561–1626) & John Locke (1632–1704) formed modern empiricism: the view that knowledge originates in experience (tabula rasa) and that science should therefore rely on observation and experimentation.…

    • 10896 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogers, G. A. (2014, August 24). John Locke. Retrieved December 13, 2014, from Encyclopedia Britannica: www.britannica.com/ebchecked/topic/345753/john-locke…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    John Locke's America

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Uzgalis, William. "John Locke." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Version Winter 2010 Edition. Stanford University, n.d. Web. 14 May 2012. . Historical information on Locke and his theories, as well as analysis of his major works…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke believed that the most simple of our senses can build up very complex questions. The world consists of two qualities. The primary qualities involve things that do not change. The secondary qualities involve things that vary from person to person.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the beginning of the passage Locke expresses his view on the government. He feels as though civilization has given up their liberty for luxuries. “Individuals…surrendering absolute liberty in exchange for the protection...the human mind begins as a blank slate and acquires knowledge through experience.” He also thought “experience is either sensation or reflection…both begin at birth and together they entirely determine human understanding.” I would say that his ideas would be representative to another person. any people gain information by trying it by themselves. A child won’t know not to touch the oven until they get burned. I think all around people gain knowledge by experience. Even if they do not experience, they may experience…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, John Locke explained that humans learn only from experience. We as humans experience things with our senses and through reflection. His revolutionary view was that we are born knowing nothing at all. At birth, our minds are completely blank, a tabula rasa. Which is why being completely empty can be filled with what we know to be true through experience (History in the Making).…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Guide to Locke

    • 22561 Words
    • 91 Pages

    John Locke's An Essay Concerning Human Understanding is a classic statement of empiricist epistemology. Written in a straightforward, uncomplicated style, the Essay attempts nothing less than a fundamental account of human knowledge—its origin in our ideas and application to our lives, its methodical progress and inescapable limitations. Even three centuries later, Locke's patient, insightful, and honest reflections on these issues continue to merit the careful study that this guide is intended to encourage.…

    • 22561 Words
    • 91 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Frankenstein

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Locke says that we learn about our senses and get our ideas through experience. He says: First, our senses, conversant about particular sensible objects, do convey into the mind several…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Vs Locke

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dating as far back as the 17th and 18th century, the dispute between rationalism and empiricism has long been the opposing philosophies of René Descartes and John Locke. Descartes was a rationalist who believed in innate ideas, solid reasoning, and the ability of deduction. In contrast, Locke was an empiricist that believed in sensory perception, induction, and attaining knowledge through experience which he argued was our only source of ideas. This brings us to the prompt; describe the difference between Descartes' and Locke's theories of how we acquire knowledge of the external world. According to Descartes' First Meditation, he writes that knowledge is naturally in us, and that this knowledge comes from the mind. In addition, Descartes points…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays