Nancy Mairs has multiple sclerosis, and therefore refers to herself as a cripple. Mairs does now view cripple as a negative word. Instead, in the passage, she describes the word cripple as "a clean word, straightforward and preside." In the passage, Mairs presents herself a "tough customer, one whom the fates/gods/viruses have not been kind, but who can face the brutal truth of her existence squarely. "She uses this metaphor to show people how tough and strong she still is after accepting her life as it is.…
Off the bat, Nancy Mairs was straight forward about how she presents herself. She is a cripple her use of diction with the word "cripple" really buts into effect what the word means to her.. In her Of passage, Nancy goes deeper into the power of language and how it shapes perceptions, in this situation regarding disability. Through her unapologetic choice of the word "cripple" to describe herself, she challenges societal norms and makes the readers rethink their own preconceptions. about disability and the way people discuss it.…
her condition, and how she feels calling herself “crippled” best defines her situation. According to Mairs, “‘cripple’ seems to me a clean word, straightforward and precise.” Although Mairs doesn't mind being called “crippled”, she understands there are other words used to describe someone who might have a similar condition. Mairs proves to be a smart and straightforward person when discussing a topic that others might find uncomfortable.…
In the passage, Mairs brings forth a tone of seriousness, while also explaining her reasoning as to why she calls herself a "cripple." She has accepted of her state of well-being. "As a cripple, I swagger," she says knowing that she is in a condition where she does not have control of some of her limbs. She does not let her disability her in a negative way. Mairs does not prefer the title, "disabled"…
Imagine having a disease that cannot be cured called multiple sclerosis. People are staring at you calling you handicapped and disabled. Just take a second and imagine you losing the full use of your limbs. Nancy Mairs has this heartbreaking condition. But, Mairs does not refer to herself as handicapped or disabled. In this passage, Mairs presents herself as "crippled."…
Instead of using the euphemistic word “disabled” or “handicapped,” she strictly chose the word “crippled.” She expressed that using other words, doesn’t clearly express her condition. She explains, “These words seem to be moving away from my condition, to be widening the gap between word and reality.” She doesn’t want to make the reader feel sympathy, instead she hopes they will view her as a strong woman. She feels as if “crippled” is the perfect word to describe how she feels. Mairs replaces the euphemistic words and phrases with much more brutal sounding phrases to show that she doesn’t feel pity for…
The word choice used by any writer can portray or hide any of the author's points or secrets. Nancy Mairs uses repetitive diction in which she repeats words such as "handicapped", "disabled", and "crippled" in order to propel her self-definition across to the reader. Mairs uses a mediocre choice of language in her passage that allows her to be clear and precise as simply stated in line15, ""Cripple" seems to me a clean word,…
The significance of Mairs calling herself a cripple is determined through her diction. She states how words like “underdeveloped” have molded to “developing” when comparing transformed countries to that of “disabled” people. She states, “Some realities do not obey the dictates of language.” Using words like “developing” to describe countries that are suffering aren’t portraying what’s really going on, just how words like “handicapped” don’t capture the truth and reality of a person who is “handicapped.” This is why she chooses…
Nancy Mairs author of Disability- a self-claimed “radical feminist and cripple” with many accomplishments and degrees under her belt, Nancy is known to “speak the ‘unspeakable’” in her poetry, memoirs and essays, especially in Disability which was first published in the New York Times in 1987.…
Nancy Mairs's essay “Disability from Carnival Acts describes how the speaker, Nancy Mairs, lives every day with a disability. She reveals her view on the handicap and disabled. Nancy Mairs has multiple sclerosis, weakening of the bones, and she feels as if she is being judged and is inferior to everyone else. The audience is definitely aware of how she feels. She is very blunt about her feelings and everything else. She wants to make a stand for all the disabled people. The essay displays desperation, as well as hope. She is desperate to be equal and to no be judged; She has hope that one day all handicap will be equal. Nancy Mairs is a true symbol of how handicap people can persevere, stand through anything, and triumph over adversity. She lives a competent life filled with judgmental people looking at her poorly, simply because of her disability.…
Author of disability Nancy Mairs who’s a feminist and a cripple, has accomplished a lot in writing and teaching. Her remarkable personality shows in many of her essays especially in Disability which was first published in 1987 in the New York Times. In this essay, Nancy Mairs shows how disabled people are constantly excluded, especially from the media. By giving out facts and including her personal experiences, Mairs aims for making some changes regarding the relationship between the media and people with disabilities. Mairs thesis is shown implicitly in the first and last paragraphs. Her main goal is to show everyone that people with disabilities are just like everybody else and they should be included and accepted in all daily activities. By using irony, intensity, humor and self-revelations, Nancy Mairs succeeds to get her message through.…
The poignant story of Jean-Dominique Bauby’s life begins in December 1995, when he finds himself in a hospital, recovering from a severe coma, both paralyzed from head to toe and unable to speak. Though Bauby’s mind is still intellectually intact, he is diagnosed with what most people call today, “locked-in-syndrome”. Through his powerful words, Bauby, the author and narrator of this story, takes us on a journey filled with pain, loss and courage. I believe that though Bauby did indeed have a disability, he only fit into two of the three definitions categorized as having a disability; these being, function barriers (impairments) , activity barriers (Disabilities) and participation barriers (Handicap).…
Unfortunately, “Sometimes we create our own heartbreaks through expectations.” In Hurst's "The Scarlet Ibis," the unique narration and diction is used to convey the danger of pride, as symbolized by Doodle's inspirational yet devastating struggle to live up to his brother's unfair and unrealistic expectations. Throughout this paper, you will see just how different handicapped people’s expectations are for themselves than the people’s expectations around them.…
Throughout the essay, “Becoming Disabled” by Rosemarie Garland-Thomas, her main claim that she argues is that she wants the disabled community to be politicized in the eyes of society. First, Garland-Thomas talks about politicizing disabilities into a movement. She compares and contrasts movements for race and sexual orientations to the movements about disability (2). Disability movements have not gained as much attention as race or sexual orientation movements because so many Americans do not realize how prominent disability separation is in America. She wants people to start recognizing that disability is just as important as race and other movements. Next, Garland-Thomas speaks about different types of disabilities and how they aren’t always…
In the essay “cripple” (1992), Nancy Mairs, implies that the word cripple is the better suited word for her because it does not hide the fact of what she really is and because handicapped or disabled is just a nicer way of saying cripple. Mairs made it clear that she wanted to be called crippled and not handicapped and/or disabled, it made her feel undeveloped and insecure. Mairs said society is no readier to accept crippledness than to accept death, war, sex, sweat, or wrinkles, in order to prove her point that society cannot see anything other than the way a person looks. The intended audiences are people that base their opinions on the looks of people and not their personality.…