In the years 1511-25, England managed to successfully pursue a policy of peacemaking due to Wolsey’s excellent diplomatic skills and managed to negotiate peace at London in 1518 between twenty countries and become a leading power in European affairs; this reflected extremely well on England’s image with the rest of Europe and could be viewed as the basis for the argument that the policy was successful. Further argument for the successes in foreign policy outweighing failures could be made by referring to the successful initial invasion campaigns against France between 1512-13 as well as the several peace negotiations England had arranged up until the year 1525, the several invasions it had fended off on the Scottish border as well as Wolsey’s immense skills in funding the policy. In this essay I will be looking at whether these successes outweigh the failures in foreign policy.…
The ultimatum in Brussels influenced the war to the point where Belgians found it hard to keep their neutrality, and at the end it caused the British to get involved into the conflict. Germany sent an ultimatum to Brussels in which they demanded to allow the German troops to cross through Belgium. “If Belgium opposed Germany’s passage through her territory, the note concluded, she would be regarded as an enemy, and future relations with her would be left to the decision of arms. An unequivocal answer was demanded within twelve hours”(121). After considering the ultimatum, Belgium rejected it because she tried to avoid war. The Belgian government was aware of the fact that if they let the Germans pass through their territory, it would automatically ruin their relations with French and eventually lead to war. If Belgium accepted the ultimatum she “would be an accessory to the attack on France as well as a violator of her own neutrality, besides opening her to German occupation with small likelihood that a victorious Germany would remember to withdraw”(122). Belgium knew that either way she would be occupied, but she couldn’t agree to the German ultimatum since it would be such a loss of honor and respect. In addition to that, Belgium had a weak leader – King Albert who basically…
Britain had to do this to help loyal Canada on the northern frontiers and unite the Indians against Americans. The American authority also did not take any drastic action against British presence at the beginning because they better realized that if England had not been war-weary, she might have crushed the colonial armies. According to Vergennes, the French minister, ‘ . . You will notice that the English buy the peace more than they make it. Their concessions, in fact, as much as to the boundaries as to the fisheries and loyalists, exceed all that I should have thought possible.’ However, it was neither England’s unexpected generosity nor Shelburne’s foolishly ‘the dishonorable surrender’ as his critiques claimed. In fact, Shelburne wanted to shake off ‘the white men’s burden’ and desired to establish profitable commercial relationship and keep the United States away from French post-war influence as well as to avert future friction with the United States. What Shelburne aimed was to win over his three European foes i.e. France, Spain and Netherlands by reducing America from the ranks of enemy. Thus, he tried to lure Americans into a loose tie with the British Empire. This trend of Anglo-American relationship developed afterwards and stretched to the present though some bitter incidents occurred between…
In contrast to the latter’s long tradition of expansionism and territorialism, the Dutch Republic came into existence in the late 16th century, a loose federation of provinces that had escaped from Spanish domination. What drove the Dutch into overseas ventures was not the prospect of expanding their land holdings and claiming sovereignty in other lands, but the promise of lucrative trade that would allow the Dutch to hold onto their precarious autonomy. With England, trade with the natives was less important than the establishment of territorial claims. This required the subjugation of the natives which was justified by the superior civil-inferior savage belief. In comparison, Dutch economic policy did not require the large-scale conquest of territory; in fact, it may have mollified their claims to superiority so long as a commercial relationship was being…
In this booklet I am trying to convey to my readers some of the experiences, sights and emotions, which have been my lot to pass through, during the time I was sergeant in the Australian Infantry.…
The first controversy between the Flemings and Walloons was political tension. After the Belgian Revolution in 1830, the new nation of Belgium had to come to terms in context of political leaders, but the dispute between the Flemings and Walloons was so strong that no political settlement could be officiated. In Document 2, an American diplomat speaks about the history of Flemings and Walloons, stating that Walloons are impatient politicians and deny tradition, while Flemings feel strong nationality and are better contenders to run the government. This document is supported by Document 4, where a Brussels-based newspaper claims that Walloon control the north, but resist monarchial power, while Flemings are ardent supporters. In Document 8, a French observer discuses the struggle for political power between the Flemings and Walloons, stating that the Catholic Flemings lead a politically dominant party and their leadership demands must be met over those of the Walloon politicians. Through years of battling, Walloons and Flemings still found their selves butting heads in the political arena, but still, all of that fighting came down to one issue: language.…
In 1793, France was at war with it’s surrounding countries; Austria, Prussia, Sardinia, Great Britain, and the United Netherlands. France turned to America for support because in America’s time of need, during The American Revolution, France aided America. France thought it was time for America to repay them. In response, the US drafted the Proclamation of Neutrality which said that they would not be taking any side in the war. Although some may say that America was obligated to aid France, America made the right decision to stay neutral, since America was vulnerable lacking a strong army, and they had no legal obligation to take action.…
The 1790’s wasn’t the easiest of times for Britain. Revolution overthrowing the monarchy in France caused working-class civilians in Britain to entertain the idea of revolutionizing. This, among other aspects such as the war with France and food supply, meant that Britain, led by Pitt, had to fight off the threat of revolution. It would be a fair statement to make that although Great Britain had big enough threats and factors for revolution to actually happen, the threat lacked a certain spark that could have ignited the revolution, spreading into a full-blown fire across the whole country, helping end the monarchy.…
A report on the middle colonial region in preparation for a possible war with France. The middle colonies would be beneficial in the upcoming war with its exclusive geography, economics, political and social aspects.…
Historians have debated the powers of the king and parliament for centuries, and the events that molded the power balance between the two institutions. This power balance had been changed to a large extent by the end of the seventeenth century from what it had been at the beginning; as power and control slipped out of the monarchy’s grasp and into parliament’s hands. For could James the 1st have ever imagined that in a few years time his son would be beheaded on the charge of treason, and the monarchy itself would be abolished? Could William the 3rd have contemplated having the power to command a standing army, and conducting a foreign policy independent of Parliament? No one can deny the political changes of this era, however, what can be argued is what form this change took; an evolution or a revolution?…
In some ways Imperialism made the life of the native people better by building and maintaining new infrastructure that the natives didn’t have before. With the new infrastructure the natives were able to lead longer and happier lives with more amenities provided by things like libraries and hospitals.In India the railroad system put in place by the British is still running and useful today as are many of the roads and hospitals. These services and India’s huge population has led to India being one of the premier economies in the world today. However in the Belgian Congo these improvements were more temporary with very few being serviceable today, and even the ones that are serviceable do not offer much of a service to the natives because of the enormous limits on where they can go and what they can do. This is…
The First World War began in 1914, following a series of events starting with the assassinations in Sarajevo. In 1917 the war was in its fourth year with the troops from both sides locked in trench warfare, neither side capable of a decisive victory.…
Cited: Document 1: This excerpt is from a report from the Committee on Foreign Relations of the U.S. House of Representatives on our nation 's growing conflict with France and Great Britain…
1. The Belgian colonialism lead the conflict between the Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda because The Belgians put the Tutsis in power. The Tutsis were well dressed and the minority of the population of Rwanda and also had all the power. The Hutus were treated with little respect and were limited with jobs that would bring them great wealth. The main character Paul Rusesabagina was a hotel manager but was also a Tutsis who housed Tutsis refugee and helped people try to survive the riots that the Hutus were starting and the many killings that were going on. But here is where all the terror happened because after the Belgian left, the Hutus were back in power and they treated the Tutsis horribly, if they saw a Tutsis they would want to kill them.…
The invasion literature that developed at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth century has been the object of numerous studies as it is acknowledged to have added to the increasing tensions between Britain, Germany and France leading up to the First World War in 1914. For example, in 1969, the French historian Marc Ferro wrote: "Over twenty works in England foresaw the British surprised, invaded and defeat Overall this literature reflected the nagging worries besetting the country." (The Great War.P. 29-30).…