There are many benefits that can come from therapeutic cloning. By taking healthy cells from a patient and creating clones they can be transplanted
to replace or repair damaged or diseased organs. Treatments for diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Huntington's, motornuerone disease and possible even spinal cord injuries could be treated and possibly even cured. Using these cell lines derived from individual patients mean customised blood, organs and tissues can be used to lift the burden of the disease. Another benefit of therapeutic cloning is that by using diseased cells and cloning them to develop new, more sophisticated drugs.
A couple of major issues have resulted after therapeutic cloning has been proposed. Many argue that by putting a nucleus into an unfertilised egg that an embryo is created. This embryo is then destroyed within a week or two after the cells are extracted. Their main contention is that something shouldn't be created to then be destroyed especially when it has the potential to become a child. The procedure itself is very controversial and this can be seen in many articles based on the ideas of therapeutic cloning.
I believe that any chance at being able to help and improve the quality of lives of those suffering from diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's should be taken. By refusing to allow this research, we have no idea what future benefits, cures or medical breakthroughs we are slamming the door on for living Australians' (Australia's Industry, Tourism and Resources Minister - Ian MacFarlane). I think that theoretically the embryo or blastocyst shouldn't actually be called this as it is misleading and it has not actually been created by the process of fertilisation. In the situation of therapeutic cloning a whole new organism is not being created just tissues that could help save and improve their lives.