Given just this information alone, one might conclude that free will is a falsity because we can’t control these brain impulses. However, Libet also tasked subjects with reporting when a will to act was suppressed as the experiment continued. In these cases, where a will to act was not carried out, large reaction potentials still occurred. This indicates that the subjects were in fact preparing to act. One possible explanation that Libet proposed is that free will allows voluntary actions to proceed. This would make sense for the instances in which subjects vetoed acting, as impulses still occur but the action is not undertaken. However, Libet himself admits that this doesn’t seem very likely, as some acts are performed mindlessly without an individual’s conscious wish to do so. An example of this might be driving home from work and not remembering the car trip at all. This can happen when actions, like a car trip, are repeated with such frequency that it doesn’t take a conscious effort to succeed in doing
Given just this information alone, one might conclude that free will is a falsity because we can’t control these brain impulses. However, Libet also tasked subjects with reporting when a will to act was suppressed as the experiment continued. In these cases, where a will to act was not carried out, large reaction potentials still occurred. This indicates that the subjects were in fact preparing to act. One possible explanation that Libet proposed is that free will allows voluntary actions to proceed. This would make sense for the instances in which subjects vetoed acting, as impulses still occur but the action is not undertaken. However, Libet himself admits that this doesn’t seem very likely, as some acts are performed mindlessly without an individual’s conscious wish to do so. An example of this might be driving home from work and not remembering the car trip at all. This can happen when actions, like a car trip, are repeated with such frequency that it doesn’t take a conscious effort to succeed in doing