Preview

Bennett Drug Policies And The Intellectuals Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1001 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bennett Drug Policies And The Intellectuals Summary
To understand Bennett’s views, one had to research about intellectuals, the word drug, and learn more about addictions. One trails with the author and he tantrum of drug abuse because his arguments are almost precise and point out a large scale of uprising problems. The reading “Drug Policies and the Intellectuals” targets the drug policy, intellectuals and the consequences of legalizing drugs. To be clear the propositions that bennet states, are propositions he is against for and he gives his voice to persuade why legalization is not a wise choice. His argument is not effective because it lacks the completion to target drug abuse.
The propositions that Bennet states are: “(a) that the drug problem in America is absurdly simple and easily solved; and (b) that the drug problem in America is a lost cause” (547). These deal with the issue of drug abuse because they are unattainable. Bennett gives a left and right side and both have the tendency to fail. The Right believes “there is a
…show more content…
The entity of drugs is large, what is considered a drug? Bennet flipped a coin upon his speech in the beginning which is why would such intellectuals agree to legalization. He accounts for his reasons, as the reader who kept reading only became fond of the bigger idea behind drug abuse and legalization on why I shouldn’t change my mind. Legalization is a demoralized idea that need a vast amount of thought a process. There is a target and that is addiction. Addiction is more or less a dependency for an unproductive life. Bennet’s style of delivering his speech was different and rather mystifying a few times. He margins his audience as to those who oppose his views to be intellectuals of some type. His speech is by means packed with thought and insight about the drug abuse reality, he lacks more confirmation. One would have been remarked by more facts and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The response to drug use in America and in some countries around the world seems to have an interesting history. As the author Daniel Patrick Moynihan describes the unintended consequences society faces when government does not deal effectively with issues of drugs in society. He provided several references that shows the historical and present connections to government interrelations and how many of these decisions have some form of negative impact and at times causes social breakdown. His historical reference to drug uses, medicinal properties as well as technology role in our present age does paint a vivid picture of how government decisions can affect us. Since the article was a bit difficult to follow in the beginning and kept discussing historical and current events, I had to focus on the relevance of what was happening then, now and probably what will happen in the future if our government does not address the pros and cons of dangerous drugs, technology and how not addressing these issues can lead to societal breakdown.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In my writings I am going to be discussing the beliefs of James Q. Wilson and Douglas N. Husak. They both have very different views on drugs, Wilson is more of the conservative who believes drugs should be banned altogether, as opposed to Husak, who believes the use of drugs should be a personal choice. First, I am going to talk about James Q. Wilson and his views against the legalization of drugs. One of Wilsons claims is that the lack of availability would lead to less drug use and addiction. Wilson believes that if drugs were to be legalized then it will be easier for addicts to recruit other people into trying new drugs.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 1980s and early ‘90s, Nancy Reagan proposed an anti-drugs campaign with the slogan Just Say No. Her solution to the drug problem was to teach children to say no to drugs, and rely on self-restraint to defeat temptation. Reagan believed children would be able to turn away from drugs if they had parents who raised them to be morally sound. Conservatives give priority to Moral Strength, and see those who use marijuana and drugs as morally weak and lacking self-control. A drug user, then, must change their personal values instead of relying on drug treatment centers or social change in order to quit their habit, Lakoff explains, “If the metaphor of Moral Strength has priority over other forms of explanation, then your poverty or your…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1301 Eng

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Having a presence and a resume to prove it, Mr. Bennett builds a firm idea that can be understood, but that is all it is, an idea. Right from the start he belittles those who use drugs (some of which are deemed intellectual) and at the same time shows signs of pity by saying they could have been a functioning part in society. This idea almost contradicts itself until you delve into his thesis. “I’m sorry to say that on properly intellectual grounds the arguments mustered against our current drug policy by America’s intellectuals make for very thin gruel indeed.”(633) now you realize his tone at the beginning was a sarcastic remark to the idea of people crowned as the…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, he takes a different approach to regarding the War on Drugs. While he feels that current drug policies have failed, his book focuses on the injustice of punitive drug laws and believes we should stop punishing people for using illicit drugs. “A law whose purpose is deterrence must always be backed by a demonstration that the law is just.” (ix) His book is presented in three chapters. Chapter one describes our present drug policies and laws and raises questions to answer whether these are just or unjust and offers his position of decriminalization as a more ethical approach to drug use. Chapter two reviews the most frequent arguments used in favor of punishing drug users and Husak believes that none of these are convincing enough to warrant enacting laws on a person’s behavior. Chapter three declares that punishing drug users is counterproductive and damaging to us…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Bennett Drugs

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In William J. Bennett’s argument, Drugs: Should their Sale and Use Be Legalized, he tries to persuade the readers that drugs should not be legalized. He goes on to explain the national drug policy and the intellectuals that by and large are against it but have little to contribute to the matter. The argument like he says is a little one sided, there is a whole lot to say about the national drug policy and very little to say about the intellectuals.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the arguments against legalization of drugs is what we have all grown up hearing which is “drugs are bad”. This reason has been said throughout most of our life and is what we learn in schools. However, legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco have caused more harm than illegal drugs. Another argument against legalization is that it would send mix signals to children. Drugs are bad and “just say no” have been sayings we have all learned growing up. However, if drugs were suddenly legal children would be confused. The rates of use can fluctuate in high school students with their confusion about drugs. Another argument against legalizing drugs is that the drug epidemic for late 1800s to 1900s ended because of society’s shift in attitude…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It’s not right for taxpayer money to be paying for somebody’s drug addiction. On top of that, this is going to increase personal responsibility and person accountability. We shouldn’t be subsidizing people’s addiction.”…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It’s not right for taxpayer money to be paying for somebody’s drug addiction. … On top of that, this is going to increase personal responsibility and personal accountability. We shouldn’t be subsidizing people’s addiction.”…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legalization of Marijuana

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Gray, James P, (2001) Why our drug laws have failed and what we can do about it: A…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legalizing Drugs

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is no question that America has a drug problem. Every day, millions of dollars worth of drugs are being sold and used, causing inumerous health problems for American users everywhere. The strict anti-drug federal policies, however, do not seem to have any effect on today’s rising number of deaths caused by addiction. Though many believe that the dangers of illegal drug use can be remedied with stronger policies against them, the best thing the government can do for today’s recreational drug situation is to legalize it.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The country should take a new look at drug legalization as a solution to a problem that has been long out of control. Although a person may feel that he or she can't live without their particular addiction, there is no scientific proof or medical test for an addict. Since drug legalization is the topic of this essay let us focus on alternatives to the War on Drugs. One possibility for controlling drug abuse is to legalize illegal drugs. In contrast to today's society where drugs are illegal there is not much difference. If the government would legalize and regulate drugs a substantial industry and tax income would result. The jail overcrowding problem would be reduced by fifty percent in some estimates and violent crime would decline. Of course…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Drugs Be Legalized

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his essay “Drugs”, Gore Vidal calls into question the legalization of drugs for three main reasons: not everyone will become addicted to drugs, crime will decrease with said legalization, and man has the right to make his own decisions, and do what he thinks is best for his life. Although Vidal wrote his essay in the 1970s, drug legalization is still a highly debated topic of today. Vidal wants his audience to agree with his logic, that drugs should be legalized, sold at cost, and properly labeled with side effects. The overall question here is whether or not the audience is convinced, the answer is no. Although Vidal makes many valid points, he fails to incorporate enough evidence to support his ideas.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug Legalization Essay

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For years we have lived in a world of violence and crimes, and for years the solution of this problems has been right in front of us. Undeniably, drug legalization is the answer for the peaceful world we are looking for. This could benefit us in so many ways, so why are people against something that will provide them a better present and future?…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article "should drugs be legalized", which is written by William Benett, argues about the legalization of drugs. According to the article drug should not be legalized because they have very harmful mental and physical affects on human beings. After reading this article I had a positive reaction towards it, thus I have the same opinion on the legalization of drug as this article.…

    • 916 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays