Preview

Bentham's Utiltarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
763 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bentham's Utiltarianism
Give an Account of Bentham’s Utilitarianism (30 Marks)
“The greatest good for the greatest number” is the basic principle of Bentham’s Utilitarianism. To demonstrate this theory, consider this situation: there are only enough seats in a car to take 5 of 6 people to the cinema- should one person be left behind? According to Bentham, yes, the five people should still go because the decision brings pleasure to the greatest number of people.
As a hedonist (someone who believes that pleasure is the chief ‘good’), Bentham thought that pleasure was the sole good and pain the sole evil. Bentham composed a theory which took this into account. The theory is based on a teleological approach where the consequences determine the morality of the action. It has consists of three main parts: the Motivation of Humans, the Principle of Utility, and the Hedonic Calculus.
Bentham’s theory is a form of Act Utilitarianism. People who follow this rule maintain that the good action is the one that leads to the greatest good in a particular situation. This rule is flexible, being able to take into account individual situations at a given moment. However, it has the potential to justify any act.
The starting point of the theory looks at what encourages humans to make specific choices. He says that all humans are motivated by pleasure and pain. He states that all human beings pursue pleasure and avoid pain. Jeremy observes that pleasure and pain identify what we should and shouldn’t do.
With the dilemma mentioned previously, where there are not enough seats in the car for everyone to go to the cinema, if the majority of people receive the most pleasure by going to the cinema, then going without one person is what they should do according to the theory as is produces the least amount of pain.
The Principle of Utility is the second part of the theory. This determines the rightness or wrongness of an action by its usefulness. According to Bentham, action is right if it produces the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bentham developed the idea of utilitarianism and that we all like pleasure and dislike pain. The idea of utilitarianism is we focused on…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bentham said: ‘the principle of utility aims to promote happiness, which is the supreme ethical value… An act is right if it delivers more pleasure than pain and wrong if it brings about more pain than pleasure.’ To help people choose what would have the best possible consequence, Bentham provided a way of measuring it. This is the ‘hedonic calculus’. There are seven elements: the intensity of the pleasure; the duration of the pleasure; the certainty of the pleasure; the remoteness of the pleasure; the chance of succession of pleasures; the purity of the pleasure and lastly the extent of the pleasure. Bentham invented this to help people weigh up and measure how much pleasure an action will produce. Bentham was interested in the ‘greatest good…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jeremy Bentham was a philosopher, economist, atheist and social reformer. Being a social reformer means that Bentham worked to make a gradual change to society. Being an economist meant that he had knowledge in the social science and discipline of economics. Bentham was a philosopher because he studied ways of thinking about the world. This all had an impact on the way his ideas were influenced. He developed the theory known as Act Utilitarianism. His version of Utilitarianism is referred to as 'Act' Utilitarianism because it states that the principle of utility should be applied to every act performed in each unique situation. Any act is justifiable if it produces 'the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number'. By the principle of utility Bentham meant the 'usefulness' of a situation. The principle states that we should aim to achieve 'the greatest happiness for the greatest number'. Act Utilitarianism depends on each action or each individual dilemma being calculated. According to Act Utilitarianism it is the value of the consequences of the particular act that counts. In 1789 he wrote the book 'An Introduction to the principle of morals and legislation' He believed our main aim in life was to achieve 'happiness' and to avoid 'pain', he wanted to introduce this to society to maximise the amount of happiness produced in certain situations. His theory was made to drive a human being; pain v pleasure. As people are motivated by pleasure and pain is considered evil. As stated in his book: 'Nature has placed mankind under the governance of to sovereign masters, pain and pleasure'. Jeremy Bentham's theory is considered as relativistic; this means that there are no universal norms or rules and that each situation has to be looked at independently because each situation is different. It is also thought of as a teleological theory. This means that it is concerned with the end purpose or goal of an action in this case it should always be happiness. Bentham's…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sheppard-Towner Act

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jeremy Bentham is primarily known today for his principle of utilitarianism, which assesses actions given their results. Bentham believes that an act is considered “just” if it produces the most joy and minimal pain for the best number of individuals who affected directly or indirectly by that action. On the other hand, Kant suggests that only duty and rules ought to administer our operations, as outcomes are outside our ability to control.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Environmental Justice

    • 2381 Words
    • 10 Pages

    8. Does Bentham endorse utilitarianism as a view about personal morality, or a view about…

    • 2381 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bentham’s theory Act Utilitarianism has many strengths and weaknesses. A Strength is that this theory is considers the consequences and happiness which an action has created. This is because Act Utilitarianism is a teleological theory where actions are based on results. For example if I splash cold water at someone to wake up for school this is a good action as it has good consequences because the person I splashed water on can go on to school and gain knowledge and this I will also create happiness. Another strength would be that this theory is always seeking the “Greatest Good for the Greatest Number”. For example if I was going to bomb the world with a bomb I planted in a secret location and the only way to get the information was to torture me. An Act Utilitarian would say that I should be tortured so that I could give the information on where the bomb was and this that would create the greatest good for the greatest number.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    trolley problem

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe the theory which makes most sense is Jeremy Bentham’s theory of the hedonic calculus. However due to many decisions and actions having to be made in a matter of seconds, I can’t see it being practical in everyday life. The process of the hedonic calculus can take a matter of hours let alone minuets, and by following the process step-by step the decision that had to be made may have already passed. In relation to John mills theory of maximum pleasure and minimal pain, I strongly disagree that this is the correct answer for many ethical situations. Everyone’s pleasures are different and individual, for you to make a decision this can become a hindrance as it’s hard to define how to receive the maximum happiness from every individual. Using this theory in just a situation when it’s just your happiness involved however is a simple process, as you will know your preferences and what makes you happy. However when using this theory in a situation with more than one person it becomes a very complicated situation.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) developed his ethical system of utilitarianism around the idea of pleasure. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) later furthered and many believe he improved Bentham’s theory (Mill is often linked to Rule Utilitarianism) but still followed many of his original ideas. The theory is based on ancient hedonism, which pursued physical pleasure and avoided physical pain. Hedonism saw human beings as “Under the governance of two sovereign masters of pain and pleasure.” So a key concept that Bentham developed was the belief we are controlled by the desire to seek out pleasure and avoid pain bringing about the greatest happiness principle which is choosing the path that gives the greatest amount of people the greatest amount of happiness and the least amount of pain. This makes the theory eudaimonic.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    act and rule

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout this essay I will be comparing the Act and Rule variations of Utilitarianism to uncover the difference between the two. Utilitarianism is teleological or consequentialist approach to ethics, which argues that something is good or bad according to its benefit for the majority of the people. Jeremy Bentham formalized this theory through his principle of Utility, “the greatest good for the greatest number”. Act Utilitarianism is often linked to Jeremy Bentham’s principle of Utility as it follows the one rule – “the greatest good for the greatest number”. So an individual action is only right if it promotes happiness. Rule utilitarianism argues that moral rules, also based on the principle of Utility, should be kept by everyone in similar circumstances.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It is the greatest good to the greatest number of people which is the measure of right and wrong” (Borders). Jeremy Bentham, the man who spoke this infamous quote, ‘is the fellow who, in the 1700s, set out the philosophy of “utilitarianism”’ (Borders). The theory behind this quote, similar to others like it, is put into basic terms in The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas (Le Guin). What is utilitarianism, one may catechize. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy delineates utilitarianism as “generally held to be the view that the morally right action is the action that produces the most good” (Driver).…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eco 400

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As described in “Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation”, Bentham held that government, morality, and life should be concentrated around "the greatest happiness principle." He said that pleasure and pains…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a teleological theory which looks at the consequences of an act to decide whether it is right or wrong. There are lots of strengths to utilitarianism and not many weaknesses. One of the strengths is that it is a theory which established whether something was good or bad according to the majority of people. Bentham came up with this theory and it is known as the principle of utility. Bentham said ‘Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them to point out what we shall do’. This is the foundation for the principle of utility and it is a strength to utilitarianism as pleasure and pain can determine how people act. Bentham also said the aim of utilitarianism is ‘the greatest good of the greatest number’ and he used the Hedonic Calculus that he created to measure how good an act is and how many people it will affect, this is a major strength of utilitarianism because it tries to please everyone and each individual is equal. A weakness of Bentham’s view was noticed by Mill, Mill said it failed to differentiate humans from animals as animals can share the same pleasures that humans have, so this make human beings equal to animals. Mill also said that Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus was a weakness as it was too impractical as to use it you have to think of the; purity, intensity, certainty, extent, duration and fecundity of an act. In some situations this would be pointless as there might not be time to complete the Hedonic Calculus. For example is your house was on fire and you only had time to save either you cat or your dog you would not be able to think through the Hedonic Calculus as by the time you have your house would be burnt to the ground. This is a weakness to Bentham’s theory but not to utilitarianism because you can still please the majority without looking at the Hedonic Calculus every time you want to complete an act.Bernard…

    • 517 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his book, J.S. Mill attempts to build on Jeremy Bentham's original idea of Utilitarianism. His definition of the moral theory is one that is grounded in Bentham's original work but also extends to include remarks to criticisms of Utilitarianism.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Create all the happiness you are able to create; remove all the misery you are able to remove." - Jeremy BenthamJeremy Bentham created the utilitarianism school of thought, which is an incredibly useful ethical position. It can be most effectively defined by Wikipedia, "Utilitarianism is the idea that the moral worth of an action is solely determined by its contribution to overall utility." Utilitarianism has many benefits, but those benefits are harmonized with some major flaws. I will discuss the founding fathers of utilitarianism, the strengths and weaknesses of act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism, other forms of utilitarianism, and recent philosophers of this school of thought.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism by definition is the greatest happiness for the greatest number, therefore a community of people would most likely gain priority over an individual. If a positive act were to benefit a family of people and the opposite act would benefit a single being, the positive one would be what Bentham would encourage as it would have the best results for a larger amount of people. However, an immoral act such as gang rape which is arguably something that could never be justified, would be deemed ‘acceptable’ according to act utilitarianism as the majority of people involved would be happy, leaving only the insignificant minority unhappy.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics