Preview

Bicameralism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
327 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bicameralism
Bicameral Parliamentary System
A bicameral system is a parliamentary system of two legislative Chambers. Indian system is bicameral because both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha are involved in the process of making new laws. Bicameral literally means 'two chamber'. Countries with Bicameral Parliamentary System:

1. Australia-Parliament–Senate–House of Representatives 2. Austria-Parliament–Federal Council–National Council 3. Antigua and Barbuda-Parliament–Senate–House of Representatives 4. The Bahamas-Parliament–Senate–House of Assembly 5. Barbados-Parliament–Senate–House of Assmebly 6. Belize–National Assembly–Senate–House of Representatives 7. Belgium-Federal Parliament–Senate–Chamber of Representatives 8. Bhutan-Parliament (Chitshog)–Bhutan will become a Democratic Constitutional Monarchy in 2008–National Council (Gyalyong Tshogde)– National Assembly (Gyalyong Tshogdu) 9. Canada-Parliament–Senate–House of Commons 10. Czech Republic-Parliament–Senate–Chamber of Deputies 11. Ethiopia-Federal Parliamentary Assembly–House of Federation– House of People’s Representatives 12. Germany–Bundesrat (Federal Council)–Bundestag (Federal Diet) 13. Grenada-Parliament–Senate–House of Representatives 14. India-Parliament–Rajya Sabha (Council of States)–Lok Sabha (House of People) 15. Ireland-Oireachtas–Seanad Éireann–Dáil Éireann 16. Iraq-National Assembly–Council of Union [2]–Council of Representatives 17. Italy-Parliament–Senate of the Republic–Chamber of Deputies

18. Jamaica-Parliament–Senate–House of Representatives 19. Japan-Diet–House of Councillors–House of Representatives 20. Malaysia-Parliament–Dewan Negara–Dewan Rakyat 21. The Netherlands-States-General–Eerste Kamer–Tweede Kamer 22. Pakistan-Majlis-e-Shoora–Senate–National Assembly 23. Poland-Parliament–Senate–Sejm 24. Romania-Parliament–Senate–Chamber of Deputies 25. Saint Lucia-Parliament–Senate–House of Assembly 26. Slovenia-Parliament–National Council–National Assembly 27. South Africa-Parliament–National

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Tijerina, Andres and Montgomery, William E. Vol. 2 of Building A Democratic Nation: A…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Framers established a bicameral legislature for three reasons. First, they were familiar with the bicameral British Parliament. Second, a bicameral structure resolved conflicts between the Virginia and New Jersey plans. Third, the bicameral structure was meant to provide a system of checks and balances within the legislative branch itself.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xlandia Case Study

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We as the Special United Nations Task Force are going to make recommendations to the military and the nation’s interim leadership, so that we can find the best constitutional democratic government to fit Xlandia’s geography, history, culture, and society. In this proposal, we will present to you our recommendations for creating a solving, representative democracy. Including but not limited to, ideas about the basic function of a constitution, comparison of features of government and justification, and explanation of conditions that keep democracy strong and advice on how to develop them.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States and Sweden have astounding similarities despite the great barriers of water that separate the two countries. While the United States government is a Federal Republic and the Sweden government is a constitutional monarchy, they both have a very large legislature. The American legislature holds 534 members and the Sweden legislature holds 388, with both holding executive elections every four years (“Compare,” 1). Both countries are also members of the United Nations and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). These memberships are proof of these countries willingness and desire for cooperation and interconnectedness along with their purpose of promoting economic prosperity and infrastructure.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 13 Vocabulary

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Coalition- An organization of people or countries involved in a pact or treaty (the Constitution).…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 2 2014 2015

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The different levels of government and what process of voting they use (national, local, EU etc)…

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When comparing the communist nation of China with the democratic nation of Australia many differences are apparent. The application of the legislative (law making and modifying function), executive (administrative function) and judiciary (law enforcing and dispute resolving function) is vastly different between the two nations as can see when we compare and contrast the underlying principles of each system of government. Firstly, both nations claim to uphold the concept of the rule of law, although due to corruptive forces surrounding the Chinese court system, this concept is often thwarted and equality before the law is not upheld. Within the constitutions of both nations the basic principles of separation of powers have been applied; however on examination of the practice of separation within the nations we find that convention (in the case of Australia) and the corruptive influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have not allowed such separation. Finally, the representation of the people by each nation’s governments will be compared through examining contrasting election and law making practices. With reference to the three arms of government, the comparisons made between the underlying principles of both China and Australia’s systems of government will support the understanding that democratic nations are a government of the people, by the people, for the people; making them just, whilst communist nations often struggle to provide the same justice and citizen involvement in their political process.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before evaluating whether or not Parliament is sovereign, it’s important to define what sovereignty means. Sovereignty can be split into two; political and legal. Legal sovereignty is the ultimate power to make laws which will be enforced within the state. Members of Parliament and the Prime Minister have ultimate legal power because they propose and enforce legislation. Citizens have no legal sovereignty because they don’t play a role in the legislative function even though pressure group activity may influence decisions. Political sovereignty is where real political power lies, and depending on the situation political sovereignty doesn’t always lie within Parliament. Critics have argued that due to recent changes, Parliament is no longer truly sovereign. This essay will assess the arguments for and against.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bicameral- The division of a legislative assembly into two chambers or two houses. This relates to the unit because we are talking about the formation of our government and people though that Bicameral was the best way to rule the legislative…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lipjhart, Arend 1999, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven and London, Yale University Press…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dual Federalism

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Focus of Unit: This unit focuses on the historical situation of the framers at the time of the Constitutional Convention. Emphasis will be placed on the features of federalism, separation of powers, and checks and balances, that were incorporated into the Constitution to carry out limited government.…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 1867, the Parliament of Canada has been the heart of Canada’s democracy. In fact, Parliament is the legislative branch of government in Canada with the lower house being the elected House of Commons and the upper house being the Senate. In Parliament, issues of the day are examined, the government is held accountable, and policies and laws are decided on. Although Canada has been a democracy for the last 150 years, Canada’s political institutions are in need of reform as distortion in representation at the House of Commons as well as the effectiveness of the senate are undermining Canada’s democracy. To be able to understand the extent of the issues in the legislative branch of government, it is important to know how each chamber operates…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A two-party system is a form of party system where two major political parties dominate voting in nearly all elections. As a result, all, or nearly all, elected offices end up being held by candidates chosen by one of the two major parties. Under a two-party system, one of the two parties typically holds a majority in the legislature and is usually referred to as the majority party while the other is the minority party. The United States of America is considered a two-party system. The chances for third party candidates winning election to any office are remote, although it's possible for groups within the larger parties, or in opposition to one or both of them, to have an influence on the two major parties. Having a smaller party candidate can influence the opinions on voters as well as electors because it allows for a change of mind with the various opinions and propositions candidates may bring about in their running for office. According to Martin P. Wattenburg, The Boston Globe, September 21, 2003, “ With a number of viable parties to choose from rather than only two, people tend to feel that their party truly embodies their specific interest, and hence they are more likely to vote.” Because of this people will vote because each individual has his or her own opinion on the way America should be governed. When having to choose from two parties the ideas that someone may have may not exactly be pin pointed and the individual will less likely be obliged to vote because he or she feels their point has not been brought into action. Having variable parties more people can their views brought about. However in a final decision for each party must be reached and will eventually lead to the choosing of two particular parties of what we have today.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to be recognised as a new and independent country, such nation must be able to determine what system of government should be used. If the new country will choose the democratic form of government, there are two systems to be chosen. These include parliamentary and the presidential system. The main goal of this paper is to determine the pros and cons of parliamentary and presidential system in a new country.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Thesis statement: It is known to most that Western countries are on the rule of parliamentary democracy. We also know that Western countries inherited their political system from the ancient Greeks and Romans, especially the Roman political system. It has shaped western parliamentary system more than any others. However, different parliamentary systems have their specific characteristics. Has shaped from what it was in Ancient Rome to that we see today. This paper will compare and contrast the Ancient Roman Senate to today Modern American Senate.…

    • 4122 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays