Preview

Bio Anth

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
449 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bio Anth
Origin of Modern Humans

Scientists have attempted to explain the origin of modern humans using models. Outline and critique the arguments presented in the “Multiregional”, “Assimilation”, and “Replacement” Models of modern human origins; referring to evidence from fossil finds and dates; genetics; and the archaeological record.

Multiregional Model (aka Regional Continuity)

Summary:
“Lumper”
Predict regional lineages of Homo sapiens
Ancient Homo sapiens ancestry; 1.7 mya
Gene flow makes us one species; multiregional origin
Repeated migration; “Out of Asia”
Regional Homo erectus characteristic in local Homo sapiens (ancestor descendent, Asia)
Neandertals interbred with anatomically modern humans (AMH)
Major proponent: Milford Wolpoff

Local populations in Europe, Asia, and Africa continued their indigenous evolutionary development from premodern forms to AMH
Modern Homo sapiens did not exclusively originate in Africa
Through gene flow and natural selection, local populations would not have evolved independently of each other and such mixing would prevent speciation between the regional lineages and maintained human beings as a single though polytypic species
That is, all hominins following Homo erectus are classified as Homo sapiens

*Recent data suggest that this model is not longer useful for telling us anything about origins of modern humans

Complete Replacement Model

Summary:
“Splitter”
Predict Homo sapiens fossils first came from Africa
Recent Homo sapiens ancestry; 200 kya
Speciation event -> new species -> Homo sapiens; localised origins
Replaced indigenous hominins; “Out of Africa”
Regional overlap of Homo erectus and archaic Homo sapiens
Neandertals did not interbreed with humans
Major proponent: Chris Stringer

AMH first evolved in Africa and only later dispersed to rest of the world, where they then replaced existing hominins
AMH arose within last 200,000 years, then migrating to Asia and Europe, completely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Migrations of hunting-foraging bands of humans during the Paleolithic era, from East Africa to Eurasia, Australia and the Americas.…

    • 906 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her article entitled “Close Encounters of the Prehistoric Kind”, Science Magazine correspondent Ann Gibbons explains that due to interbreeding between Neanderthals and early modern humans, modern humans still contain traces of prehistoric Neanderthal DNA. According to researchers, Asians and Europeans most likely possess a higher frequency of Neanderthal genomes than Africans because the two species “occupied the [same regions] intermittently” in Europe, the Midwest, the Near East, and Russia and may have coexisted with one another for up to 10,000 years before the Neanderthal lineage died out. The article explains that Neanderthal genomes are present in “many people living outside of Africa” as there was not enough interbreeding occurring…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This book is inspired by just such a cross-cultural encounter as that between Kamal the border raider and the Colonel’s son of the Guides. In the first chapter the author recounts a conversation that he, a biologist studying bird evolution, had in New Guinea in 1972 with Yali, a local politician preparing his people for self-government, which culminated in the searching question ‘Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo [goods] and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own’ [p. 14]. ‘Yali’s question’ plays a central role in Professor Diamond’s enquiry into ‘a short history of everybody for the last 13,000 years’, leading him into a wide-ranging discussion of the history of human evolution and diversity through a study of migration, socio-economic and cultural adaptation to environmental conditions, and technological diffusion. The result is an exciting and absorbing account of human history since the Pleistocene age, which culminates in a sketch of a future scientific basis for studying the history of humans that will command the same intellectual respect as current scientific studies of the history of other natural phenomena such as dinosaurs, nebulas and glaciers.…

    • 2579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quiz 2 Bio 100

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The small population numbers would have resulted in specific genetic traits being passed down to the subsequent generations. The lack of any other gene pools to intermix with would have allowed for specific traits to pass down within a community.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He approaches each in the best scientific tradition, carefully sifting the evidence, never jumping to hasty conclusions, giving everyone a fair hearing -- the experts and the amateurs; the accounts of the Indians and their conquerors. And rarely is he less than enthralling. A remarkably engaging writer, he lucidly explains the significance of everything from haplogroups to glottochronology to landraces. He offers amusing asides to some of his adventures across the hemisphere during the course of his research, but unlike so many contemporary journalists, he never lets his personal experiences overwhelm his subject.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 1: The first stages of humans originated from Africa approximately 7 million years ago.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Denisovan Genome Decoded

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Until recently, most scientists thought that there were only two species of humans (i.e., modern humans and Neanderthals) living in Eurasia in the Upper Palaeolithic (50 – 10 thousand years ago). However, over the past decade several finds have indicated that there were several more. Svante Paabo and his colleagues at the Max Planck Institute (MPI) of Evolutionary Anthropology have revealed further proof of this fact with genetics. They sequenced the genome from the bones of an individual that had been found in Denisova Cave in southern Siberia. The results indicated that the individual was not a modern human or a Neanderthal. The new species has been named Denisovans. Together with Neanderthals, Denisovans are the closest extinct relatives of modern humans. It is likely that all three species knew of each others existence and may have even lived together in what is today Siberia. Future genomic comparative studies should help scientists uncover important genetic differences that contributed to the development of modern human culture and technology.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Guns Germs And Steel

    • 3483 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Humans developed in Africa. “…, indicates that the earliest stages of human evolution were also played out in Africa.” (Page 36)…

    • 3483 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hist 1311 Review

    • 26424 Words
    • 106 Pages

    Human evolution has proceeded against a backdrop of great Ice Ages. The latest one occurring only 20,000 BCE years ago…

    • 26424 Words
    • 106 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two theories about the origin of modern humans; the out of Africa view argues that genes in the fully modern human all came out of Africa and there was no interbreeding involved and the alternative model; a multi-regional view that argues how all human population flowed between different regions and mixed together which contributed to the development of the modern human. What makes these theories the most highly debateable in paleoanthropology is that 30,000 years ago, the taxonomic diversity previously seen amongst homo sapiens, homo erectus and homo Neanderthals had vanished and humans everywhere had evolved into the anatomically and behaviourally modern form; there is much deliberation as to how this occurred which rose this differing schools of thought; one that emphasises multiregional continuity and the other that suggests a single origin for modern humans. In order to understand this controversy, the archaeological, anatomical and genetic evidence needs to be evaluated.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many articles that could be used to back up prof. Haws and Cochran article adding up to the examples given. An Article by Reed et al. they talk about how you can see the adaptive introgression through lice. According to the article “Morphological and molecular data agree that primates and their lice have been cospeciating for over 20 MY” (Reed, 2004). Thanks to the lice data researchers were able to know when the humans speciated into different species. After some time both species went through a bottleneck, which left the species with a low adaptation rate. Later generations of lice show that there was a gene flow between species of human, this proving contact of the species. Different sources of information give more validity to the studies. A second article talks about how it is hard to see the archaic lineages thanks genetic drift. “Our study thus provides a methodological template for identifying additional loci in the human genome that might harbor alleles from archaic populations through introgression and subsequent positive selection.” (Evans et al., 2006) Even though the article by prof. Haws and Cochran has many examples and data, another source of data is always good. There is another article by Lieberman et al. that explains about the behavior of the different human species. After the contact of Archaic and modern humans not only did gene flow happened thanks to adaptive introgression but also behavior of the modern species changed. According to the article by Lieberman et al. Modern humans copied seasonal hunting from archaic humans. As we some in class, this is proof that behavior can also be passed on between similar species. This would give a different view to adaptive introgression making the paper go further and have more impact to the…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Neanderthal Research Paper

    • 2929 Words
    • 12 Pages

    There is a theory that humans descended from an earlier, lower form of life. There is an assortment of evidence that shows that all living creatures on Earth descended from a common ancestry. Evolution doesnt discriminate against humans. It is believed that we too are a product of an earlier predecessor. The similarities in all life are evident if you consider that every form of life builds from the same building blocks--20 essential amino acids, four nitrogen bases, and simple sugars. Each of Earths past and present forms of life are, or were composed of a combination of those building blocks called RNA or DNA. In the very beginning of life on Earth, the genetic structure was very simple, but as time has gone by, the best combinations in the…

    • 2929 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each ice age destroyed the habitats of creatures that had adapted to the arctic condition. But after each glaciation new species spread. As time went on, one branch lead to apes and the other lead to human beings, this line was named hominids. Indicated by J.M Roberts, “The first hominid fossil found in Kenya and Ethiopia are dated only 4.5 million years ago.” But then a French fossil hunter…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defending Slavery

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Steel, Mike; Penny, David . "Origins of life: Common ancestry put to the test". Nature 465…

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Own Land In America

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Paleoanthropology is the study of human origins with the use of anatomical, archaeological and genetic evidence (Johanson, 2001). In order to trace the modern human or Homo…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics