Preview

Bismarck Dbq

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1141 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bismarck Dbq
As governments experienced many revolutions and uprisings in the name of nationalism, some countries’ respective leaders realized that their traditional conservatism would eventually destabilize their authoritative legitimacy. Thus, leaders such as Otto von Bismarck adopted a new kind of conservatism, mixing both liberal, semi-socialistic and conservative policies in order to keep a balance that would ensure some stability in his state. For Otto von Bismarck, his international policies were more conservative; he promoted nationalism, unification, and state sovereignty. His domestic policies, however, were more liberal; he allowed for progressive social reforms and implemented separation of church and state. When it came to a German identity, …show more content…
He quickly learned how to play the uber Catholic, conservative, and liberal sides when needed, and he eventually learned how to balance his policies so that each side remained fairly contained (Doc 4). During the 1800s, talk of liberal reforms, socialism, and communism was rising. Many people in the German government realized this insurgent of new thoughts and encouraged Bismarck to modify his policies. Politicians such as Wagener in document three wrote to audiences in the Reichstag and even Bismarck himself because the politicians knew that they could not risk losing the worker’s votes to the Socialist Party who promised laborers their own rights and insurance (Doc 3). Bismarck realized his politicians spoke the truth. From Bismarck’s point of view, he knew that if he didn’t adapt at least some version of these rising demands, he would remain Chancellor for a very short time. Thus, when it came to social reforms, Bismarck adopted his own version of the socialist party’s platform. He stated he would compromise by taking on some socialistic reforms because those reforms were a way to help those who cannot help themselves (Doc 6). Even the Kaiser himself realized his government must make their own approach to social reform. Bismarck promoted accident coverage for laborers and welfare for people who do not have the ability to work-- all ideas sprung from moderate …show more content…
This balancing act, however, angered true liberals because Bismarck had mixed their ideas with his conservatism, thus contaminated their previously apparent, separate ideologies. They also criticized his nationalism because his domestic policies would be problematic in the long run-- and these liberals would later be proven correct (Doc 7). Though Bismarck as a genius at balancing the forces against him, the balancing act could only last so long. Soon, Bismarck was fired and the old Kaiser died, leaving Kaiser Wilhelm II to disband most of Bismarck’s policies and inevitably cause World War One. During Bismarck’s time as Prime Minister, he had to balance his foreign affairs as well. In order to do that, he created an alliance system with the two powers surrounding him, Austria and Russia. However, after Bismarck was fired, Wilhelm II disbanded the alliance with Russia, and France quickly allied in Germany's place. After this shift in alliance, Serbian radicals decided to assassinate the Austrian heir. In a vengeful rage, Austria went after Serbia and was thus backed up by Germany. Serbia was backed up by Russia and was thus backed up by France. Then, England joined France’s side and World War One began because the men after Bismarck couldn’t handle what Bismarck had previously

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Berlin Dbq

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page

    These opposing desires of the major countries was soon invigorated through the creation of the Treaty of Berlin (1878). A focus on land reorganization in the Balkan region led to certain countries getting exactly what they wanted while others failing to receive the recognition they thought they deserved. This would in turn help set up two polarized campaigns in the area, facilitating for a quick fall of dominoes upon the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. The Treaty of Berlin (1878) was one of the most crucial agreements established that would enable both sides for World War I. Without the making of this treaty, the occurrence of the war may have been postponed and the countries fighting in the war may have been different. The resentment and…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 Dbq 1 Analysis

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Otto von Bismarck created the idea of alliances because he did not want to fight a war on two fronts and he wanted other countries to help him: “When negotiations failed, he developed an alliance with Austria-Hungary and Italy which became known as the triple alliance. In response, France and Russia and Great Britain formed an alliance known as the Triple Entente” (Background essay). Both alliances created plans because they were paranoid that the other alliance would start a war. Alliances influenced WWI to occur because it made countries bolder in the war since they had other countries to support…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Otto von Bismarck’s government policies represented a new kind of conservatism where Bismarck valued traditional ways but also advocated for idealistic reforms aligned with socialism. However, he was still criticized by both conservatives and socialists, arguing that Bismarck was too much of a socialist but still not liberal…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    HIST 531

    • 4076 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Leo von Caprivi- Was an German General who succeded Bismarck as Chancelor. He sepperated the office of Prussian Minister President and chancellor of the Reich which Bismarck previously held simultaneously. Under Caprivi’s system secretaries of state were given greater freedom and were allowed audiences with the Kaiser. Further Caprivi introduced the “New Course” which changed foreign and domestic policy towards conciliation with social democrats and a pro-british policy away from the Bismark policy. Caprivi was an ex‐military man who, as a result of this, Wilhelm II was quick to trust. He instigated his own ‘New Course’ – which aimed to ‘kill Socialism with kindness’. He wanted to allow some of the Socialists wanted, including re‐introducing Free Trade and extending the social welfare reforms put in place by Bismarck.…

    • 4076 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck had a new enemy; he had set his sights upon The SPD, the Socialists. Carr noted that “Socialism, like Catholicism had allegiances beyond the Nation state which Bismarck could neither understand nor tolerate.” The whole of Europe was already fearful of the events that took place within Paris, and even though the socialists were hastily quashed, they managed to overthrow a major European power albeit for a very short period of time. Socialism was on the rise in Germany, and Bismarck was unhappy with this as the current order was under threat. In order to attack the Socialists, Bismarck now needed to set up ties with a different political party on the spectrum and this was the Conservatives. Bismarck learned to a certain extent that he could not use his “Blood and Iron” approach like he did with the Catholics; he needed to take a much more subtle and less outright oppressive approach. As Germany was becoming more and more…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck was successful in political control over Germany as he had created a new constitution which benefitted and suited his needs as chancellor as he had created an autocratic constitution which revolved around the Kaiser and himself. Bismarck’s success was due to numerous factors such as control over the Reichstag as Bismarck had manipulated the Reichstag so that he would be supported by the party with the majority. Thus proving that Bismarck’s political prowess was a force to be reckoned, with as he successfully and tactically negotiated deals which saw him “jumping into bed with the enemy”, meaning that Bismarck would remain the figurehead for political power ensuring a pre-eminent position for Prussia this is proven as 17/58 representatives in the Bundesrat were Prussian nationals.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal on Bismarck’s ship wheel is shown telling the conservative and ultramontane, who is a Catholic, that he will indeed be on top again when the wind blows Bismarck. This document shows how Bismarck is a new type of conservative who forsakes some traditional values in order to do follow the realpolitik value of doing what’s best for the country. In order to do what’s best for the country, Bismarck sometimes has to change sides in order to keep the peace and unite Germany. In Kaiser Wilhelm I’s speech to the people of Berlin in November 1881 (Document 5), Wilhelm I talks about his support for Bismarck’s new welfare reforms that support Christianity and incorporate socialism. Document 5 shows how Bismarck has had to move away from his goal of suppressing the Church in order to do what’s best for the country, which is supporting Christianity. Nevertheless, Wilhelm I does hold a bias as he is a puppet of Bismarck who lets Bismarck implant his new conservative reforms as long as they keep the peace, which is why he is supporting the reforms and tying God and the country together. Document 6 is Otto von Bismarck’s 1884 speech in support of his new bill that helps socialist, but stays true to conservative values but not forsaking his and the…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bismarck main objective was to bring together the German states and to form a powerful great German State; this is why he became the main architect in the German unification. To succeed in this difficult task he used Realpolitik. He was as incredible in dealing with foreign affaires as with domestic affaires. The success of the unification was tremendous but it resulted in a very complex state that future generation had difficulties to deal with. Napoleon was brilliant in domestic affaires, but he preferred to deal with foreign affaires, which he actually wasn't able to arrange well. "The irony in Napoleon's life was that he was much better suited for domestic policy, which basically bored him, than he was for foreign adventures, for which he lacked both the daring and the insight"(P.106 Kissinger). The way he handled foreign affairs brought France into a deep crisis. He finally stopped to reign and France couldn't cope with such problems he had established.…

    • 2108 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great War Causes

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Initially, these alliance systems were intended to preserve peace in Europe; on the contrary, it drove them into world war. These alliance systems developed their roots when Prussia’s chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, claimed Germany to be a peaceful power, even though he assumed France wanted revenge for its defeat in the Franco-Prussian war. Thus, Beck states that “in 1879, Bismarck formed the Dual Alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary; three years later, Italy joined the two countries, forming the Triple Alliance.” During the same year, to ensure that France did not make an alliance with Russia, Bismarck immediately formed an alliance with Russia. Nonetheless, under the reign of Germany’s new leader Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany’s treaty with Russia broke and Russia later formed a defensive military alliance with France in 1892 and 1894. Although outraged by this alliance, Wilhelm II focused on starting a shipbuilding project in order to make the German navy identical to the famous British fleet. Based on the distrust of attack, Britain formed an alliance with France and Russia, named the Triple Entente. These alliances faced off at the Austria-Hungarian and Siberian assassination conflict. Even though Germany did not give support to its ally Austria-Hungary, Tsar Nicholas ordered…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    asdsa

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages

    European leaders believed creating a balance of power would prevent one country from being more powerful than another European country. The idea was if Germany, England, France, and Russia were all equal in power, than there would be no war. But the Chancellor of Prussia, Otto von Bismarck, thought differently. He didn’t like that Germany was being squished by Russia and France, so to solve this problem he created an alliance with Austria- Hungary.…

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With, Otto von Bismarck, Germany grew from a fragile union of states to a dominant empire. For the 19th century, Bismarck's policies limited the destinies of most of the countries of Europe. Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck-Schonhausen was born on April 1, 1815, at Schonhausen. Otto decided to learn law at universities in Berlin, and then entered the Prussian civil service. He then left the service and went back to his family but then entered politics in 1847. At the time the German states were not well organized and could never form tight bonds. Bismarck was determined to free the states from Austrian domination and to unite them under Prussian rule. Otto served as a delegate at the congregation of the German union and as representative to Russia and France. In 1862 he was appointed minister-president of Prussia.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both, Metternich and Bismarck sought to bring unity and stability to their nations, but in different ways. While Metternich was hard at work using his diplomatic skills trying to prevent German unification during the first half of the nineteenth century, Bismarck on the other hand was known as the Iron Chancellor, in the later nineteenth century set on to unite Germany through his many wars.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is A Founding Father?

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is the definition of a founding father? A founding father is someone who lays the foundation of something or somewhere. When speaking of founding fathers of modern Germany, who comes to mind? Some people would answer with Charlemagne or even Adolf Hitler. Well, the person who should really come to mind as the true fore father of modern-day Germany is a man known by Otto von Bismarck.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays