Preview

Blundering Generation

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1410 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Blundering Generation
Running Head: BLUNDERING GENERATION 1

The “Blundering Generation” in the Civil War
Camila Alvarez
AP U.S. History Period 2

BLUNDERING GENERATION
Abstract
This paper explores the term coined by James G. Randall on 1940 “Blundering Generation”, which encompasses the “real” reasons that lead to the Civil War and blames the political leaders of the Era, the mistakes they made, their inability to compromise, and the way the Civil War was actually, and probably still is, romanticized (The Blundering Generation Revisited). Throughout the essay, I will analyze some of the events that justify Randall’s term, showing some key moments when politicians from the 19th century could have compromised and perhaps prevented the loss of so many lives, but this paper will also explain my own point of view towards the Blundering Generation’s role in the causation of the Civil War, agreeing with Randall’s and also his colleague, Avery Craven’s, point of the leaders not being able to truly fight for a settlement between both sides, but perhaps not with idea of it being an “avoidable conflict” nor it being so emotionalized nor placing the blame on political leaders specifically, and addressing the big differences between the North and the South as much more than just secondary causes.

BLUNDERING GENERATION 3
The “Blundering Generation” in the Civil War After President James K. Polk’s lowering of tariffs and denial of funds for internal improvements, many Northerners were very enraged. Polk’s desire to expand South and his presidential choices made many Northerners believed he was trying to extend the life-style of the Southerners’ life, and they believed he had his own agenda to follow, despising their idea that the Cabinet was “dominated by southern minds and southern principles” (U.S History). Here it’s shown how, by the 1840’s, the North was already building their hate towards the South. An important figure in all this matter was David Wilmot,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.
    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your

    The North and South in the nineteenth century were different in lifestyle and morale as well as economy. The north had a booming industrial economy while in the South, cotton was king. Because of this, congress was continuously addressing controversial matters and providing answers that did not satisfy either one side or both. The early 1800s were full of the North and the South making many attempts at reconciliation that just fell short. Among those were the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Great Compromise of 1850. Other tempestuous attempts led to the Tariff/Nullification Controversy, anti slavery debates in congress, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Whether it was one side or the other, there was always someone to oppose - and in some cases, defy - the laws put in place, which eventually led to the succession of the southern states and the Civil War.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John C. Calhoun and The Problem With Southern Nationalism Rough Draft
    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John C. Calhoun and The Problem With Southern Nationalism Rough Draft

    Shortly after the War of 1812 had ended under Madison’s reign, America had come to a period popularly known as the “Era of Good Feelings.” The Americans had just come out of a great battle, emerging victorious, thus proving themselves to be a competent world power. However, although the time period after the War of 1812 was dubbed the “Era of Good Feelings,” growing tension due to a sudden rise of southern nationalism under John C. Calhoun, too much involvement from the government, and disagreements over slavery created such disunion that the nation descended into utter chaos. The so-called “Era of Good Feelings” was, in fact, a misnomer – not only was it not a time of good feelings, but it was actually a period of great disunion.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edward Pollard's 'The Lost Cause Regained'
    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Edward Pollard's 'The Lost Cause Regained'

    If Jefferson Davis was the ember, then it was Edward Pollard that provided the wind to start the firestorm in constructing this image of the South with his books The Lost Cause and The Lost Cause Regained. Pollard championed the idea of the South fighting for states’ rights, slavery was not cruel, and the South fought against great odds. Pollard, in his attempt to write history, stated “The Union was nothing more than convenience of the States, and had no mission apart from them.” Pollard saw the political division line between the North and South to be coincidental that this line separated slave holding states and non-slave holding states. Pollard paints the Confederate army as “ragged and poorly-equipped.” This was to contrast the Confederate…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    To What Extent Was Slavery the Cause of the American Civil War? Essay Example
    • 4190 Words
    • 17 Pages

    To What Extent Was Slavery the Cause of the American Civil War? Essay Example

    In his second inaugural address in March 1865, Abraham Lincoln looked back at the beginning of the Civil War four years earlier "all knew," he said, that slavery "was somehow the cause of the war." This essay will endeavour to discuss the role of long term divisions caused by the slavery debate in the eventual outbreak of the Civil War. In doing so this analysis will encompass the period between the birth of the nation beginning with the start of the American Revolution in 1763 and the conclusion of the Civil War in 1865. This being a period in which the newly independent nation struggled with its state system, with each of the former colonies possessing the rights to a significant level of self-governance that inevitably led to disagreements and conflicts of interest. One such conflict was the disagreement over slavery which James Ford, like Lincoln, believes was crucial in creating a clear North-South divide that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Whilst recognising slavery’s overwhelming contribution to the outbreak of the American civil war in 1861, one must acknowledge alternative factors beyond slavery, which contributed to the nations descent towards armed conflict. Revisionists such as William Gienapp and William Freehling emphasise the political contribution to the outbreak of the war and the influence of sectional ideology on ante bellum politics. It was this differing ideology that created the tensions between Southern and Northern parties creating political chaos during the 1850s, the North believing they were attempting to save democracy whilst the South campaigned for increased States’ rights, all of which provoked the outbreak of war. As well as the long-term divisions over slavery and the short term political contributions to the outbreak of war, historians such as Charles and Mary Beard placed emphasis on the…

    • 4190 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War Awakening Summary
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Civil War Awakening Summary

    All the reasons have a tendency, in the author's point of view, to point to the Republican administration of the Union on the need for drastic change in the leadership of military operations, and the general approach to military and domestic policies. This is especially true of the President Lincoln, whose authority grew, and the government during the war was almost unlimited. The political analysis of the situation of the war years provided throughout the book is not the key purpose of the author of 1861: The Civil War Awakening. The real aim of Goodheart (2011) is to present it fluently as it would be frivolous and arrogant in relation to this complex, multi-dimensional process. To understand the situation of those difficult years, to understand a complex set of problems which confronted Lincoln and his administration, is possible only if a reader grasps as much as possible, in order to break through…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Summary Of Mary Ann Sandoval Interview
    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Summary Of Mary Ann Sandoval Interview

    As we begin our interview, my mom, Mary Ann Sandoval, a diligent working individual who had been through a lot in her college years. She is someone who knows and understands that working hard comes second nature. In the beginning of the interview, her appearance had a nervous and skeptical look, since she wasn’t sure what to expect. Her major was Accounting/Finance because she loves the way numbers interact with a numerous amount of careers. The colleges that she had applied to and attended to was Contra Costa College, Diablo Valley College (DVC), and Oakland Merritt College, nevertheless they are all junior colleges. While attending the colleges, she had received a miniature amount of assistance ensure that she can pay for her tuition and…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    For Cause and Comrades: an Analysis
    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For Cause and Comrades: an Analysis

    The ideologies that drove citizens to combat in the Civil War varied dramatically between Northern and Southern soldiers. Many soldiers who enlisted in the Federal Army of the North did so as to preserve the young nation, which had less than a century ago, gained its independence from England. The idea of “freeing the slaves” was a very small concern in the minds…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Northern Neglect: South, Ruined Reconstruction
    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Northern Neglect: South, Ruined Reconstruction

    One reason the Northern Neglect ruined Reconstruction was because of the country’s extreme racism towards the blacks. There is a political cartoon on the cover of Harper’s Weekly, March 14, 1874, and it shows the North’s thoughts towards African Americans (Richardson 517). It shows the thoughts of the politicians that were freedmen that were fighting and being reckless. It is intended to mean that blacks are lazy, dumb, “fat cats”, corrupt, angry, and a threat to society. The North and South both agreed on the thought…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Henry Grady
    • 949 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry Grady

    Grady was a well-spoken, quick-witted and extremely skilled public speaker. He used this proficiency as another platform to express his political messages. His most notable speeches were about “The New South”, an idea that Grady gave his full support and used as the backbone for his speeches. This was a clever tactic because the concept of a “New South” was one that appealed to everybody, North or South, Black or White, Republican or Democrat, could get on board with improvements in the South. Especially because it meant something slightly different to everybody that heard it. Grady was invited to speak of this “New South” in front of a meeting of The New England Society which he delivered on December 21st, 1886 to many Northern politicians and leaders such as The President of the United States, Grover Cleveland, and Union war generals4. Henry Grady’s “The New South” speech was one of shared optimism and opportunism.…

    • 949 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Era of Good Feelings
    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Era of Good Feelings

    Contrary to what many historians refer to it as, the period from 1815 – 1825 was not an “Era of Good Feelings,” rather it was plagued by underlying issues that would jeopardize the future of the United States. Though the time from 1815 to 1825 looks like a period of substantial growth at face value, the period is marked by conflicting interests between the North and the South, political disunity and conflicting nationalist ideas.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why the South Lost the War
    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Why the South Lost the War

    “A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved—I do not expect the house to fall—but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other.” These words, spoken by Abraham Lincoln during his campaign to be a senator from Illinois, ring eerily true with the truth about the country’s uncertain future. Only three short years after Lincoln gave this speech, civil war would break out between the northern and southern states, and it would end four years later with the South running away with its tail between its legs. Why did the South lose the war? The South entered into the Civil War unprepared to fight and, ultimately, was starting a fight it was destined to lose. In the end, there were five factors that led to the defeat of the South: The fundamental economic superiority of the North, a basic lack of sound military strategy strategy in the way the South fought the war, the inept Southern performance in foreign affairs, lack of a dominating civilian leader in the South, and President Abraham Lincoln (Hersch, 2002).…

    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Reconstruction: Success or Failure?
    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil War Reconstruction: Success or Failure?

    The Civil war was possibly the greatest tragedy that this country had ever faced. Years of constant arguing, compromises and cynical ideas about slavery pushed this so called "United Nation" into an atrocious collision between the Northern abolitionists and the Southern proslavery farmers and plantation owners. The nation suffered enormous losses economically and went into a downward spiral. The reconstruction period began with many leaders stepping up to try and fix this crippled country, but it didn't turn out like everyone hoped. Slavery was still the largest issue and the reconstruction halted because of the disagreements the people faced. After many years of working, compromising and passing laws, the task proved itself to be impossible, as the country remained to be separated. The lack of unity was present because most of the amendments, laws and rules passed during reconstruction were created to protect and ensure the rights of African Americans. However the South continued to promote slavery and "putting blacks in their place" until the 1950's.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican War Did Not Cause the Civil War
    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Mexican War Did Not Cause the Civil War

    Plagued with the ever-present plight of war, the United States has endured many forms of this widespread and deadly affliction over the course of its relatively young life. Unceasingly analyzed in hopes of perhaps understanding the underlying and sometimes hidden causes, such wars have captivated the minds of scholars since the moment the nation's fathers tore independence from the stubborn clutch of England. Consider the great Civil War, a war that tested the United States' reputation of increasing power, of unification, of steadfastness. Often simplified and romanticized when being presented to young children, the causes of the Civil War are much more muddled and shady than any middle school teacher can make them out to be. While it is undeniable that the Mexican War accelerated the arrival of it, the Civil War was ineffable. Propelled by factors such as the Supreme Court's controversial Dred Scott decision, the popularity of Uncle Tom's Cabin, and the emergence of the Republican party, based on the fundamental opposition to slavery, the eventual explosion of tensions between the North and the South was unavoidable.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Fate of Their Country
    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Fate of Their Country

    "To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics