Central to Bonilla-Silva's argument is the idea that racialized social systems create hierarchies where certain racial groups occupy superior positions, gaining economic advantages, political influence, and social esteem. The dominance of certain racial groups isn't solely about individual merit, but is structured into societal …show more content…
However, he argues that race often operates independently within these intersections, affecting life chances distinctively. While race intersects with other social categories, racial hierarchies can exist and impact individuals regardless of their class or gender positioning.
Racial ideologies justify and perpetuate racial hierarchies by shaping perceptions, behaviors, and societal norms. They can be explicit or implicit, influencing everyday interactions and institutional practices. Contestation over racial ideologies and structures is essential for challenging and potentially transforming racial hierarchies within societies.
Bonilla-Silva critiques traditional sociological approaches that reduce racism to individual prejudice or ignore its structural foundations. He advocates for a framework that examines how racialized social systems operate across multiple dimensions. Adopting a structural perspective helps in understanding the systemic nature of racism and devising strategies for addressing institutionalized