Preview

Boston Marathon Bombing Article Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Boston Marathon Bombing Article Summary
On April 15, 2013 I remember hearing from Mr. Ham that the Boston marathon had been bombed at the finish line. The only knowledge I had of this incident before I read about it— was that it was a terrorist attack. After reading this article explaining about the convictions of the two terrorists Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, there isn’t any sort of bias that I can see going on in this topic. Although the author doesn’t have her own argument about the situation, she talks about the dispute between the terrorists and the prosecutors and the jury. The prosecutors and the jury came to the conclusion that Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, were found guilty.

In the first paragraph, the author says, “The Tsarnaev brothers responsible for the attack were the center of a manhunt that lasted four days.” This is her main argument—saying that the Tsarnaey brothers are the ones responsible for the 3 dead and 264 people injured during the Boston Marathon bombings, in 2013.

Mary Carol uses events that happened during the trial to support her article. The trial is really her only primary
…show more content…
She also includes towards the end of the story, about a recent poll that had been taken among Boston residents. This poll stated that most of the citizens had a bias against Dzhokar, and wanted him to spend life in prison as a consequence for his actions. This didn’t help his case at all, because in these types of scenarios people are followers. So, if the variety of people want Dzhokar to spend life in prison, most likely the rest of the people will make that same decision in order to keep the crowd happy. Then, you ask the question, “Why do all these people want this man to spend the rest of his life in prison?” It must be because all of the evidence points at

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 2 Journal

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The main argument of the article was to explain to the reader a how a truth commission was formed, and broke it down step-by-step explaining how it was started, and ending with outside factors that could be problematic during the trials. Hayner broke down how truth commissions were started, and went into detail also explaining the selection process for adding a person onto the committee. She followed up with explaining how long the truth commissions lasted for, and how these trials were funded. The article transitioned to the next phase of the truth commissions, which defined certain parameters such as what information would be recorded and how much evidence what needed for someone to be found guilty. The final portion of the article…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On Monday April 15 2013, which was Patriot Day, an atrocity happened in Boston, United States. As everyone already knew, it was the Boston Marathon Bombing. The annual Boston Marathon bombing started just like other years, without any clue of the calamity. The marathon began as usual and horde of crowds gather along the sidewalk, cheering for their families and friends. The contestants endured the tiredness and headed towards the finish line. A spontaneous chant of "Go, Go!" bursted out as the runners moved closer and closer towards the ending. But just then, a bomb was released on Boylston Street, near the finish line. Many people screamed, and the air was filled with dirt and gases.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Based on what I read it says that, it is possible that she knew about the kidnap plot, but that would have determined a less harsh punishment than death. This proves that, she knew about the kidnap plot, which means she was guilty, but she wasn't guilty by death. ( Article 2) According to the text it says that, she was innocent and only trying to jind John Northy, who owed her money. This indicates that, she had no idea of the kill plot, but just wanted to get some money back.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    On April 15, 2013, during the Boston Marathon, homemade explosions were detonated near the finish line taking the life of 3 Americans and injuring more than 260. The explosive devices were determined to be two pressure cookers strategically set to detonate 210 yards apart at 13 second intervals. The investigation lead was taken over by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) who released photographs and surveillance footage of two particular suspects on April 18. The two individuals were categorized as Chechen brother named Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Once these photos were released to the public, the two brothers took the life of an MIT police officer, carjacked a sport utility vehicle and exchanged gun fire with the Watertown police. The shoot out resulted in a second officer being critically injured while one of the suspects Tamerlan Tsarnaev was determined dead at the scene, younger brother Dzhokhar escaped with injuries. A Watertown manhunt followed the April 19 event with thousands of law enforcement personnel converging on a cordoned 20 block search area. Throughout the day long search, Watertown and nearby residents were warned to stay indoors with many public establishments closed. Later that day, the “shelter in place” advisory was lifted for the Watertown area. Shortly after these statements, a Watertown resident found the alleged suspect hiding in his back yard inside the family boat. Police forces converged on the area and arrested Dzhokhar. He was transported to the hospital with serious injuries. At the hospital, an initial questioning took place. Dzhokhar claimed his brother was the brains behind the incident and they were personally motivated because of the Afghan and Iraqi wars. They were indoctrinated with extremist Islamic beliefs and proclaimed as self-radicalized and had no outsourced connections to any terror groups around the globe. The brothers…

    • 2096 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Timothy McVeigh was a dead man smiling” (Riley). McVeigh was a mass murder with a decent childhood. He took the lives of 168 people. If he felt bad for the bombing, his body language did not show it (Riley). McVeigh lived in New York with his family. His dad worked nights and his mom lived the bar life. His parents got a divorce and his mom moved to Florida (Collins). McVeigh was a smart kid. He was a talkative and liked all through school. Growing up he got close with his grandfather. His grandfather…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sam Sheppard

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Starting on the day of the murder, the media began to attack Sheppard on any occasion they could. Stories were obtained in unethical, and nearly unlawful ways. Even though they were permitted to do so by the courts, going into Sheppard's house and looking through his belongings was not the most ethical practice. Also, though the courts also allowed them to witness the testimony of Sheppard about his wife's death, they really shouldn't have agreed. Stories were written in an unscrupulous manner. The “trial before the trial” was a meeting between the coroner, Samuel Gerber, and Sheppard, in which Gerber fired questions at Sheppard in front of the entire community – without Sheppard’s lawyer present. The media was allowed to sit in on this hearing and wrote stories about Sheppard being unfairly given too much leeway as a murder suspect (law2).…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adnan's Case Study

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I feel that the narrator is somewhat bias on her reporting. Though she gives us all the information regarding the case if it makes Adnan look guilty, we somewhat feel that she is trying to prove that Adnan is not guilty and that his trial was not fair. Adnan’s cousin who knew of her because Sarah had written an article about Adnan’s lawyer contacted Sarah. This shows that the narrator was obviously interested in this case and even told us that she has spent a year looking into this case, this would show that could have bias towards the case.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agnes of God

    • 3357 Words
    • 14 Pages

    It was a high profile case. Ms. magazine dispatched Catherine Breslin to cover the trial, which lasted ten days. The fact that Sister Maureen had waived her right to a jury trial only served to heighten the courtroom drama. Even in the supposedly enlightened days of the late 1970s, some questioned out loud whether a Catholic nun could expect to receive a fair trial from a Jewish judge.…

    • 3357 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All in all the Haymarket trail and Zasulich’s trial were supposed to serve as an example to revolutionary groups. However the verdict of Zasulich was much different than the verdict of the eight men accused of throwing the bomb. Although, there were many witnesses that saw Zasulich shooting Trepov she was found not guilty. On the other hand they never found out who was guilty of throwing the Haymarket bomb. However, eight men were convicted based on the mere fact that they were anarchist leaders or associated with the anarchist…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article by Matthew James Nance titled “A Mockery of Justice” he writes about an inmate’s tale of what happen to David Martin Long in the late 80’s. While David Long was still incarcerated there was a reporter that was interested in writing about his story her name was Laura Miller and in 1994 she came to the prison to interview him. She wrote about his injustice in which he wanted to be executed but because Texas law had an automatic appeal process his execution could not be carried out and therefore no matter how many times that he wanted to oppose this the state of Texas denied him his execution. He tells her about his trial and how short the deliberation was. He goes into great, detail in telling her of his wrong doing and how he knows…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the text it states, “she wants us to finish it.She said so.Be doing her a favor.” This evidence shows how the authority has no clue that Mary was the one that killed her husband. The police could have asked Mary more questions about where she had been. Instead the authority ended eating the murder weapon that might have imprisoned the criminal. They assumed that everything the wife had done was because she wanted to make supper for her husband,but it is all a plan to be able to get away with the…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacoby uses several methods in his writing to help support his thesis. first, he uses historical facts. in his introduction he descriptively describes the different punishment cases in Boston during…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    crim 131 lecture 1

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    encourages the crown and defense to present distorted version of the events in order to win the case…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sfcd

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Tamerlan Tsarnaev travelled to Russia in 2012 for a lengthy trip to the Russian republic of Dagestan…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life Is Not a Game Lesson

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    OVERVIEW The document we are about to study is an extract/excerpt from a report entitled “Caught in the Backlash, Stories from Northern California” published in November 2002 by the ACLU (whose aim is to defend individual rights and liberties.) The main character is called Charlotte Wu and is a 22-year-old sophomore who’s fond of/keen on/crazy about videogames. One day in late 2001, Charlotte played a videogame with her friends. Then she left the game. Later, a player phoned her and she helped him by telling him to use a bomb in the game. Then the police came to her room and interrogated her because of the call. They did not arrest her, but she wonders who alerted them. ZOOM IN 1) Paragraph 1 (l. 1-5) Maybe she had to leave because she still had some homework to do. Perhaps she had to leave because she had to be at the dorm before a certain hour. Although she was the master of the game, she may have had to leave early because… 2) Paragraph 2-3 (l. 6-10) Charlotte’s friend called her because he was stuck/stalled in the game and he needed some help. Since Charlotte is a whiz at videogames / knows the game like the back of her hand, she was the one to ask. 3) Paragraph 4-7 (l. 11-23) Who knocked on the door? Who was in the apartment? 1st knock Resident advisor Charlotte + roommate 2nd knock The police officers Charlotte…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays