Andrew Mackenzie (broadcaster on the show, first letter) is obviously not against the TV show since he chose to broadcast it. In his letter, he describes how secure it was for the kids to be on the show and how they were taken care of regardless of the situation. He is naturally trying to justify the show by telling how the produces made sure to have child chaperones and security around the children all the time. He clearly wants to convince the skeptics that the show is not doing any harm to the children, but the opposite. In his letter he says that the kids gain a lot of experience from being on the TV show and the kids’ parents learn a lot about their kids in a positive way.
Dr. Richard House (Lecturer in Psychotherapy, second letter) is not happy about the TV experiment at all. He thinks that no matter how much security and how many child chaperones you make keep an eye on the children it will never do any good for the kids. He calls the kids “child guinea-pigs” and compares them to animals. He says that even if Mr. Mackenzie has said that the kids have been screened by experts so they will not suffer from any kind of mental pain, it will never be possible to make sure that every kid is mentally suitable for the experiment. He is very much against the program.
Georgina Reid (mother of TJ, child on the show, text 2) is very positive about the concept and the experiment. With the headline “I was right to put TJ on TV” she has already stated her opinion before the reader even reads her letter. She was only worried once during the entire show, because she knew that the children were taken care of no matter what happened. They were never alone, their parents could go see them if they wanted, and she felt comfortable because everything about the experiment was so open. She says that it was great for TJ to be on the show, and she does not regret allowing him to be there.
2. James Donaghy has two different points of view on the TV show. One positive and one negative. Throughout the article he arguments for both the good and the bad things in the show. “The children surprised you with their wit and perceptiveness then depressed you with their selfishness and bullying.” He seems like an open minded person who tries to see things from different perspectives which, in my opinion at least, makes him more trustworthy. He mostly talks about reality TV in general and how he does not really like the idea of it. He calls it “Lab rat telly” because the programs/experiments are using people as lab rats, and he does not think that it is alright. In the last part of the article, James Donaghy is kind of playing with the thought of us (the viewers) as the ones who should be blamed. We are not just observers of the programs, we are actually the ones who should be put on television as lab rats. “You think you’re the observer when you’re really the rat. That goes for all of us who watch – polluted, infected, deranged fools”. I think James Donaghy is a good writer and his article is reliable. Even though he has his own opinion on things, he still tries to be as objective as possible and see the good and the bad sides of the issue.
3. I would never ever under any circumstances put my own kids on a reality show. If they accidentally do something stupid, it will be on worldwide television and they will not be able to run away from it. They will always be remembered for what they have done. Maybe the producer will cut the scenes differently so the episode is taken completely out of context (which might make it seem even worse) and it will still appear on people’s TVs. I would never let that happen to my kids. I know how much security there was around the children during the “Boys and Girls Alone” experiment, and some of the kids (like TJ, text 2) will probably get a lot of positive things out of being in it, but not all kids are the same, and I am sure that for some of the other kids it has been a bad experience. They might have been bullied or suppressed by the other children and no kid deserves that.
I do not think children belong in reality programs. When they grow up and know what they are doing, they can decide by themselves to go on “Paradise Hotel” or whatever, but not as long as their parents are in charge. That should not happen.
--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Line 13
[ 2 ]. Line 39
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Since they had given Albert, a child who originally was an emotionless being, a conditioned to stimulus of rats mainly animals or furry items, he may carry this throughout his life and shape his development. Another hypothesis they wanted to test was if you could remove these conditioned responses but unfortunately the subject was removed from the hospital, which may have led to some more findings. All in all the study had followed the scientific method, even though it may have been slightly unethical by producing fear in a child, but ethics are new subject in the field psychology which would not have been practiced back in the…
- 660 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I loved “Christopher Story”. To see that Christopher is a healthy, loving and thriving child also with the fact that is so loved is amazing. Watching Christopher’s Story I do not feel like inclusion is necessarily the best route for a child. I think that having a child in a natural environment is good for them. I think that the child needs should be addressed to make sure that the child is getting everything that they needs and MORE!…
- 389 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Stanley Milgram had advertised his experiment on a newspaper to get their attention as to needing male participants. From here, being informed that there will be two males as one would be a teacher and one would be a learner – even though there would be confederate. The participant would not necessarily be told everything about the experiment as this was the whole point of Milgram experiment to see how far a male participant would obey instructions and to see if ethics had been…
- 271 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
‘First Hand Experience: What matters to children’ – Adams, S., Alexander, E., Drummord, M.J. and Moyles, J…
- 3521 Words
- 15 Pages
Better Essays -
Infants are general used as test subjects in areas of Psychology. However, this can cause problems. For example, when infants are used as test subjects in laboratory setting they can experience distress; as a result, ethical issues should be raised. It is the experimenters’ task to safeguarding the interests and protects infants from harm. However, the rules were not always so strict, which is how John B. Watson famous study in psychology came about.…
- 316 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The experiment started with the boys becoming a coherent group. They were all living together at one large bunk-house. They quickly formed bond with eachother and picked certain people to be their “best friends.” The object was to minimize the amount of personal attraction in the formation of the groups and were…
- 818 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Boys & Girls Clubs of America is a program that was introduced in the 1860’s in Hartford Connecticut. “Believing that boys who roamed the streets should have a positive alternative, they organized the first Club. A cause was born.” Now made up of more than 4,300 clubs and in their 103rd year, the goal of these clubs is “to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.”…
- 1729 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
I think my child and I have a very secure attachment and so does my husband, I think that the program is wrong about our communication because I respond to my child’s cries. I think that program said our communication needed work because in the program at 12-8 the question was “When strangers come to visit, they think Joseph is really cute so they want to hold him. But he starts crying and is inconsolable until the person returns him to me.” And the answer I picked was “Let the person hold Joseph and try to calm him down and if it does not work have them return him and comfort him.” I picked this answer because in real life you are not going to be around the same people every single day, you will meet new ones or there will be some people that you have not seen in a while. For instance, I am going to be moving to North Carolina with my husband 6 weeks after I have my son, I am not going to be able to come home and see my family and friends every single weekend so when we do come home and family wants to see my son he is most likely going to scream and cry but my intentions are too not scare him and make him think I am leaving him. I will be in his eye sight until he can calm down, I just want my son to be able to make the connection that my mom trusts these weird strangers so I should too. If it was a total stranger then no I would not let them hold my child while he screams and searches for me but when it is someone that I trust him with, then I think that it will be okay to let him cry. Also I would not let my child scream and cry for longer than 10 minutes because his father and I should know what his cries mean and anything longer than that it could also be a hunger cry. I think that it all just depends on the situation that you are put in with your…
- 1547 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
I actually don’t define the children as troubled; the program does, a little. They use it to mean when children have behavior issues in class and/or issues with learning at the same pace as the other children, mostly in reading.…
- 934 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The boys were less excited about the subject and wrote less than the girls did. They were not envious of the women or even curious on how it would be. Most of the boys wrote about being frantic to find someone to help them to turn back. The…
- 456 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This man did inappropriate things to my stepdaughter and now we are involved in a case with DHS to have the custody of the children placed with us, because at this time they are not being kept safe in the care of their mother. The difference we are seeing compared to the film is that DHS was adamant about keeping the children together so that they had at least each other, whereas in the film Ben and Brittany are separated due to no family to take them, which makes it hard when Ben was the one there to take care of Brittany (Failure to Protect, 2003). This makes me wonder if there was enough done to try to keep the children together because with them ending up in to different foster homes, they are not only dealing with being removed from the home that they are used to, but also dealing with being separated from their siblings. The best interest of the child was taken into consideration in my opinion by removing them and trying to find foster homes that were going to be safe for them, but when their emotional well-being is looked at then we need to consider how all these changes at one time are going to affect them. Based on the film not all the correct decisions were made by the child welfare system, but there is not a system out there that does not have its flaws and there are issues and children that get left unaddressed by the child welfare system due to the amount of work that is being piled on to the…
- 676 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In a 1986 experiment, teenage boys and girls watched scary videos in pairs. Unbeknownst to the other person, one member of the pair was instructed to follow a certain script that either conformed to or rejected stereotypical gender roles.…
- 855 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The comment section of the video is filled with people who criticize the mother for her actions. Robert Thompson, a professor at Syracuse University explains in an interview with TODAY that, "These shows are really designed in many ways for us to feel superior as we make fun of the people on them, but I'm not sure these people should be disallowed from doing it..."…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Doctor Richard House is a Psychotherapy lecturer at Roehampton University, and has answered Mr Mackenzie’s attempt to calm down the critics. But the doctor is not pleased with the latest development in reality. He states, that Boys and Girls Alone is child cruelty and has no place in research or…
- 1004 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Flowers, Christine. “With No Boys to Ogle, We Had Time to Learn.” A Sequence for Academic Writing. Ed. Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. New York: Pearson Longman, 2007. 79-80. Print.…
- 879 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays