Preview

Bric

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1673 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bric
Assignment #5
12/08/2012
Bowling for Columbine Michael Moore’s engaging documentary “Bowling for Columbine”, depicts the causes of America’s obsession with guns, and also takes an in depth look into what sparked Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold to do the Columbine shootings. Moore is a decorated American left-wing filmmaker, author, social critic, and activist; Moore also has several critically acclaimed documentaries. Moore explores many reasons to why America is so obsessed with weapons, and mainly uses the Columbine incident to support these reasons. Moore claims throughout the documentary that America’s obsession with violence is correlated with the media, the violence that is conducted by America on other countries, and America’s gun control policies (Moore). Although Moore’s controversial documentary exposes many hidden issues about America’s leniency towards violence and gun control, there are also weaknesses to Moore’s documentary. Moore uses very weak evidence to support some of his claims; he lacks appropriate credibility in some areas, and also manipulates footage in order to convey his points across to the audience. Moore does an excellent job of exposing America’s obsession with weapons and violence; however he uses weak examples and lacks proper credibility in many of his claims. Michael Moore cover’s a broad range of controversial topics and relates them to America’s gun control policies in a very effective and unique way. Moore’s key supporting claims are the connections he makes between Canada’s lack of gun violence compared with America’s over usage of guns, and the fact that America instills fear into their citizens so that they feel the need to own a weapon (Moore). Moreover, Moore also demonstrates in many instances how easy it is to obtain a gun in America. To begin with, Moore compares Canada’s amount of killings in a year with America’s and Canada’s is drastically lower than America’s. This is a very effective argument because Canada



Cited: Cruriel, Jonathan. "Bowling for Columbine : Reviews & Acclaim : Articles & Press." Bowling for Columbine : Reviews & Acclaim : Articles & Press. N.p., 18 Oct. 2002. Web. 07 Dec. 2012. Kopel, Dave. "Bowling Truths - Dave Kopel - National Review Online." NRO. N.p., 4 Apr. 2003. Web. 07 Dec. 2012. Waak, Erika. "Bowling for Columbine: Are We a Nation of Gun Nuts or Are We Just Nuts?" The Humanist Mar.-Apr. 2003: 41. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 7 Dec. 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The author of The Columbine Legacy Rampage Shootings as Political Acts has stated numerous purposes within this article. The first purpose of it was to explain about the events of Columbine and attempt to show the reader how this has created a large impact resulting in more wide spread school shootings taking place. With this the author tries to convey to the reader particular characteristics that differentiate a school rampage shooting from a wide range of other school related incidents where violence was a factor. The author also attempts to show the reader types of school related shootings that have taken place before Columbine happened and even specific events which would have led to a shooting but were uncovered before it escalated that…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In October 1997, I heard on the radio that Luke Woodham, a sixteenyear-old, had killed two classmates and wounded seven others in a school shooting in Pearl, Mississippi. In a note, Luke declared: “I am not insane. I am angry. I killed because people like me are mistreated every day.”1 He explained that he was tired of being called a “faggot”; he was additionally enraged that his girlfriend—whom he killed in the shooting—had broken up with him. At the start of the Woodham case, I began examining school shootings. Two months after the massacre in Mississippi came a shooting in Kentucky, then one in Arkansas that same month, and then another in Arkansas three months later in March 1998. There was a shooting in Pennsylvania that April, in Tennessee…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 20th, 1999, a school shooting took place in the Columbine High School. Two students, fully armed with a variety of firearms, murdered numerous students. This catastrophe resulted in numerous disputes over the issues with gun control laws in relation to the Second Amendment of the US Bill of Rights, which gave US residents the right to bear arms. Later in 2002, Michael Moore explored the causes of the Columbine shooting and such violence in his documentary Bowling for Columbine. In this documentary, Moore uses logos, pathos, and ethos to convey the message that US social media, along with the freedom to bear guns, plays a major role…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of satire used by Michael Moore in his docudrama “Bowling for Columbine” helps the audience engage on the concept of tackling serious issues like the Columbine massacre and the influences to enlighten or mirror the feelings of how and what society has on the thoughts of a particular environment. Moore uses a variety of technique, ranging from exaggeration, irony, parody and juxtaposition to reveal various answers to questions raised by the society involving the use of guns and to represent its concerns.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lives of many were to change on the day of April 20th, 1999, at Columbine High School. With the death of twelve students and one teacher, it was to be the deadliest mass murder committed on an American high school campus. The massacre, committed by senior students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, sparked debate over gun control laws; whether the availability of guns across the United States, especially to young people such as these, was socially acceptable. This event is what sparked Moore to create his documentary, ‘Bowling for Columbine’.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2002 documentary ‘Bowling for Columbine’ presents strong messages concerning the low gun control and the high murder rate in “the land of the free”. Directed by Michael Moore, the documentary shows the follies of the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the US government, often in a satirical fashion. This use of humour and other techniques allowed Moore to win many awards for the documentary, including the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature 2003, but the largest victory ‘Bowling for Columbine’ had was the awareness regarding gun laws it created during its time as the highest grossing documentary (N.A, IMDB, N.D). The recent Orlando shootings renewed the debate regarding the heavily criticised Second Amendment to the American Constitution,…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    11,127 is the number of Americans killed in the United States last year with a gun. 381 is the number of Germans killed with a gun, which is the closest statistic country to the U.S. Why is there so much gun violence in the U.S? What is so different in the U.S. that gun crime is so prevalent? What can we do to change it? All questions Bowling for Columbine poses in the film documentary by Michael Moore. Like the documentary, there is not one simple answer and there are no easy solutions.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Moore's documentary, 'Bowling for Columbine', highlights the devastating state of gun violence within the United States. He also examines the events leading up to the tragic events that occurred at the massacre at Columbine High School as well as the impacts this had on society. The film was released October 11th, 2002 and was met with both critical and commercial success. It is now considered to be one of the best documentaries to ever be created, according to The Guardian.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bowling for Columbine

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Michael Marshall once said “you can’t stop being afraid by pretending everything that scares you is there” that evidently means that fear is not real. It is the product of thoughts you create, however danger is real, but fear is a choice. When following Michael Moore’s journey in the documentary Bowling for Columbine, it is proven that most, if not all Americans live in fear. In doing so, he learns that the conventional answers of easy availability of guns ultimately lead to America’s culture of fear, bigotry and violence in a nation of widespread gun ownership. Moore’s implementation of symbolism, satirical techniques and imagery support his criticism against the firearm regulations in America. He brings in the attention of how unstable the American gun culture is as he emphasizes the consequences to generate change in the American system.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun violence in Canada and America are often compared, both countries allow citizens to own guns to a certain extent. Michael Moore who stars in “Bowling for Columbine” talks about how the two countries are so similar but gun violence isn't a problem in Canada. Within the movie, Michael goes house to house in a canadian city called toronto unlocking people's front doors, after hearing multiple responses he discovered that most Canadians aren't worried about intruders. The news and media do not betray violence as a main topic, resulting in people feeling safe and being able to trust their Government. In Canada there is no legal right saying citizens are allowed to carry guns or own automatic weapons, handguns. Hunting and target practice are the main reasons someone would buy a gun in Canada, a recent survey shows ninety five percent of citizens own long guns and only twelve percent own handguns. Transportation of guns is also very limited in Canada, certain permits showing where and why you're carrying the weapon have to be on hand at all times. All guns must be registered with proper documents to ensure safety.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major issues that Canada faces each and every day is the danger of gun control and ownership. Although Canada has enforced strict laws concerning the use of guns, this issue is still very prominent to this date. The current gun control laws are highly controversial due to the easy access of guns to the general public. Some people would debate that the use of firearms is unnecessary and that Canada would benefit without these kinds of weaponry that cause major preventable fatalities every year. Individuals on the opposite side of the spectrum would argue that guns are essential for the country, as the military and the police rely on these weapons to protect themselves and others. Gun laws should increase the appropriate age limit…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it (Eastwood). Statistics are proving that we need to prevent gun violence and get rid of all access to all guns. In this country, anybody can get a gun, statistics prove gun violence is increasing, we need to prevent gun violence. Banning guns completely will make America safe again. Every day, 306 people in America are shot in murders, assaults, suicides and suicide attempts, unintentional shootings, and police intervention. Every day, 90 people die from gun violence: 31 are murdered. 56 kill themselves (Key Gun Violence Statistics). Private gun ownership should be banned.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (Opposing Viewpoints: Gun Control, 2014) This statement is totally false. Thousands upon thousands of citizens in the United States of America have purchased, owned, and carried firearms of all kinds including military-grade assault weapons and have been law abiding, well behaved, and even used his or her guns to protect his or herself, their families, and other people even. The American media, however, refuses to broadcast the brave and heroic vigilantes…. CNN, CNBC, ABC, Michael Moore (director) and many other liberally biased news networks and celebrity activists try their hardest to turn the American people against one another. They exploit, politicize, and even scapegoat tragedies and push for stricter gun laws and even bans to be passed. Other networks, such as Fox News, aren’t much better, but at least they tell the truth when it comes to guns. These liberally biased networks and individuals have taken tragedies such as the Columbine High School massacre (1999), the Aurora Colorado theater shooting (2012), The Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, and the recent Orlando Pulse Nightclub shooting (2016), all involving assault weapons (McEvers, 2016), and used them as propaganda for their liberal agendas. Take Michael Moore’s 2002 documentary film Bowling for Columbine as an example; Moore uses this tragedy to appeal to the emotional side of viewers, whilst discreetly intertwining gun control propaganda. He travels to K-Marts across America pushing them to stop selling bullets and ammunition and questions actor and activist Charlton Heston about his support of the National Rifle Association (NRA). On a lighter note, many citizens have used…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While guns can be a means of protection, other times guns can be the source of fear and despair. Many countries must deal with the topic of gun control. In Canada, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau aims to “take action to get handguns and assault weapons off of our streets” (Liberals’ Website). However, with the lack of gun violence in Canada, some people see the making of gun laws stricter as unnecessary or an attack; others see this as mandatory for the safety of other people.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages

    life . Is it our right to bear arms as North Americans ? Or is it privilege? And…

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays