Preview

Bring Back Animals from Extinction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
262 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bring Back Animals from Extinction
They brought an animal back from extinction, if only to watch it become extinct again.
“What we really need to think about is why we would want to do this in the first place, to actually bring back a species.”
In Jurassic Park dinosaurs are resurrected for their entertainment value. The disastrous consequences that follow have cast a shadow over the notion of de-extinction, at least in the popular imagination. But people tend to forget that Jurassic Park was pure fantasy. In reality the only species we can hope to revive now are those that died within the past few tens of thousands of years and left behind remains that harbor intact cells or, at the very least, enough ancient DNA to reconstruct the creature’s genome. Because of the natural rates of decay, we can never hope to retrieve the full genome of Tyrannosaurus rex, which vanished about 65 million years ago. The species theoretically capable of being revived all disappeared while humanity was rapidly climbing toward world domination. And especially in recent years we humans were the ones who wiped them out, by hunting them, destroying their habitats, or spreading diseases.
“If we’re talking about species we drove extinct, then I think we have an obligation to try to do this I think we played God when we exterminated these animals
Pimm also worries that de-extinction could create a false impression that science can save endangered species, turning the focus away from conservation. But others argue that bringing back iconic, charismatic creatures could stir support for species

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    While we currently have a vast knowledge of various animals and plants and what purposes we can use them for, we have to recognize that there are countless other species out there that we have little to no knowledge about that could possibly have beneficial uses. Even the species we have a deep understanding of could surprise us in the future when we have better technology to research them more profoundly. The Author is trying to convey a message about how we are just killing off potential species…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Conservation is getting nowhere because it is incompatible with our Abrahamic concept of land. We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect."…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evolution of Homo sapiens has had a marked effect on our geographical environment—much as it usually does with the evolution of any species. This is especially notable with humans, considering how we have evolved to the point where we not only impress upon our environment to assimilate for survival, but we also mold it to the whims of our convenience. During the dawn of the human species, we left footsteps as we gathered roots and berries. During the more recent era, we have eliminated crows due to their excessiveness, bred pandas due to their scarcity, and yet we have done little to nothing about the excessiveness of the human population. As a species, we have claimed unspoken responsibility and procured control over the existence of other species for our own advancement. Now, we would like to synthesize it. Another such case can be found in the selection, “Last Child in the Woods,” where Richard Louv presents the reader with the possibility of using genetic technology to advertise in nature. Use of rhetorical strategies such as logos, ethos, and pathos imply his opposition towards this idea.…

    • 827 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stuart Pimm offers a degree in Conservation Ecology from Duke University. His Argument focuses largely on humans are not ready for De-Extinction in that since humans were the ones that pushed them to disappear, they are not going to want those species back. He gives the example that “hunters at [the Pyrenean ibex] to extinction. Reintroduce a resurrected ibex to the area where it belongs and it will become the most expensive cabrito every eaten.” He notes that the problem is whether we can resurrect these species or not, but more along the lines of whether the rest of the population will accept the animals back in their original homes. He also believes that De-Extinction “seduces” those granting research money and support into thinking they are doing well when it simply gives “unscrupulous developers a veil to hide their rapaciousness, with promises to fix things later.”…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “De-extinction Probably isn’t Worth it”. This is the name of an article by Sarah Zielinski. I completely understand what she is talking about in her text, and I agree with her. De-extinction isn’t worth it mainly because it would take attention from other research, harm living creatures, and most of their habitats and food are gone.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Documentary Framework

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ritchie, E. (2013). 'Extinction: just how bad is it and why should we care?', 2 May 2013, The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/extinction-just-how-bad-is-it- and-why-should-we-care-13751?…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The issue should never be about the extinction of any animal, it should always be about the cruelty and exploitation which will lead to their extinction,” unknown. Each and every animal on earth has as much right to be here as you, me, and of all humanity. Scientists have found a way to clone extinct species. The thought of that sounds amazing and really exciting, but think about it another way. If we bring back no longer existing animals, us humans will do what we do best, which is changing nature and destroying it, basically killing them for money or being greedy for food. According to text “no,” there are already many living things becoming extinct many times faster than normal. Why would we worry about animals who are already long gone when there are many other things that are important to the environment that we need to care about? Another reason why we should not bring them back is because our Earth has changed significantly since they were alive. Having them back would change many things. Lastly, education costs lots of money.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, although involvement to save endangered animals in sometimes necessary, its necessity is hinged on whether it affects the human species directly, and or will negatively affect the longevity of us as a species…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No to De Extinction

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whether it is bringing people back from the dead or resurrecting an entire extinct species, for hundreds of years, scientists everywhere have had the desire and craving to try and reverse nature’s kiss of death. Modern scientists are exploring the possibility of resurrecting species, that we and our ancestors led to extinction, through the process of de-extinction or also known as “resurrection biology”. Scientists believe that this project would not only allow us to redeem our mistakes but also provide breakthroughs in the field of genetic engineering. This concept was first presented to the public in Steven Spielberg’s 1993 film, Jurassic Park that also shows how there are much greater repercussions of this experiment than there could be scientific gains. Even though these projects have purely good intentions, similarly to Frankenstein’s experiment, good intentions of a science experiment, which tampers with life and death, often have a greater chance of going south and causing more danger than benefit. Although astounding scientific breakthroughs may come to be as the result of a successful de-extinction project, there are many greater dangers that could develop for the human race through bringing back certain extinct species. While evolution may be cruel, it is never wrong therefore there was a reason for the species to have gone extinct in the first place and the natural cycle of life and death should not be tampered with artificially.…

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dinosaur Extinction

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For over 150 million years, dinosaurs dominated Earth. They were incredibly successful-so successful in fact that all of the other animal groups had no choice but to play a secondary role in nature. 65 million years ago, however, every species of dinosaur went extinct as well mosasaurs, plesiosaurs, pterosaurs, ammonites, and many families of brachiopods and sea sponges. Also, many shark species as well as most vegetation did not survive(“Dinosaur Extinction”). What could have possibly killed off the dominant animal group of the time? The answer to this question is still unclear but there are many hypotheses that attempt to explain this extinction event. To find out exactly how this happened, evidence must be gathered not only from fossils…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of this piece formal writing is to inform the scientists that are coming very close to making this happen, about how de-extinction can be good and bad for the future world. This piece of writing should be sent to scientists that are going to do this and it should also be put on science websites that have other pieces of writing like this.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    fellow creature which has at least an equal right to life" {2} I think people…

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When we hear of extinction, most of us think of the dilemma of the rhino, tiger, panda or blue whale; however these are only small pieces of the extinction puzzle. The overall numbers are terrifying. Of the 40,168 species that the 10,000 scientists in the World Conservation Union have assessed, one in four mammals, one in eight birds, one in three amphibians, one in three conifers and other gymnosperms are at risk of extinction. The peril faced by other classes of organisms is less thoroughly analyzed, but fully 40 per cent of the examined species of planet earth are in danger, including perhaps 51 per cent of reptiles, 52 per cent of insects, and 73 per cent of flowering plants.…

    • 361 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    De Extinction

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    De-Extinction is one of the hottest topics in the science world currently and it tops the lists of conservation and genetic scientists alike for next big project. Though this could be a great way to learn of past species and finally see them for ourselves, at what cost is a species revived? The idea of bringing back an extinct species, such as some type of dinosaur, comes with many questions that most find to be debatable. Conflicts arise from every aspect of this “new” animal including how it is created and if an environment can be created for it to live. This loss of habitat is what has triggered many of the human-caused extinctions in the past century. Humans are responsible for the extinction of about 500 species including the Xerces blue butterfly, American chestnut tree, Stellar’s sea cow and the Gold Macaw.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Endangered Species Act

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    citizen that saving Earth's endangered species from extinction should be a national concern. Thanks to the press, over the years, a lot of people seem to have gained a general ethical and scientific understanding of the value of biological diversity. This biological diversity, or biodiversity, is a concept that emphasizes the fragile nature of the genetic and social interrelationships of the many varieties of plant and animal life that can be found in any given ecosystem (DiSilvestro, 1993). If one species vanishes, the entire ecosystem may be affected by the loss, in a possibly devastating chain reaction that current science does not presently have the ability to fully predict the outcome…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays