The Broken Spears
The book The Broken Spears, by Miguel Leon-Portilla, presents an account of the Conquest of Mexico from the point of view of the some of the indigenous people who survived those events. The passages used, written in the native language of the victims, provide us a brief description of the encounters with the Spaniards that were not seen in the documented history of the conquest. Native priests and wise men had documented the welcoming of Cortes and his men as the arrival of their God Quetzalcoatl and other deities, the reaction to the march of these “gods” on several cities within the Aztec state, and the manner in which the Spaniards conquered this once, independent, well-structured, pre-Columbian American civilizations.
In the introduction to the book, it describes the development of a new state in Central Mexico during the 9th century known as the “Toltec Empire”. Toltec is a synonym for artist. As stated in the Cultural Stages of Ancient Mexico section of the introduction, the Toltec people were described as “superb artisans, devout worshipers, skillful tradesmen- extraordinary persons in every way.” Under the protection of their God, Quetzalcoatl, the Toltecs had extended their civilization and influenced regions down into the Yucatan and Central America. Their God soon departed, headed eastward, and promised that “someday he would return from across the sea.”
The Aztecs, a civilization that settled in the region during the middle of the 13th century, claimed to be from Toltec nobility and believed the arrival of the Spaniards to be ”Quetzalcoatl and other Gods returning from overseas.” In the ten years leading up to the arrival of the Spaniards, the Aztecs were witness to eight omens that, whether told by the Codex Florentio or the Historia de Tlaxcala, were believed to be the foretelling of that very arrival. Thus, when news of the arrival reached them, the King, Motecuhzoma, immediately sent out his messengers thinking this was the return of Quetzalcoatl.
Chapter 3, The Messengers’ journeys, begins by telling us that “the texts describing the instructions that Motecuhzoma gave to his envoys are presented first. These show clearly how the Nahuas attempted to explain the coming of the Spaniards by a projection of earlier ideas: they assumed that the new arrivals were Quetzalcoatl and other deities.” The messengers made their way to the Spaniards’ ships in order to pay reverence to their god. They said to him, "If the god will deign to hear us, your deputy Motecuhzoma has sent us to render you homage. He has the City of Mexico in his care. He says: 'the god is weary.’"
The emotions towards their gods began to change when the messengers delivered the report of what they had seen; “how the cannon roared, how its noise resounded, how it caused one to faint and grow deaf.” The messengers told him: "A thing like a ball of stone comes out of its entrails: it comes out shooting sparks and raining fire. The smoke that comes out with it has a pestilent odor, like that of rotten mud. This odor penetrates even to the brain and causes the greatest discomfort. If the cannon is aimed against a mountain, the mountain splits and cracks open. If it is aimed against a tree, it shatters the tree into splinters. This is a most unnatural sight, as if the tree had exploded from within." They become fearful of the news that Cortes was planning on marching on the city. This fear is described in Chapter 4, Motecuhzoma’s Terror and Apathy. “Motecuhzoma was distraught and bewildered; he was filled with terror, not knowing what would happen to the city. The people were also terrified, debating the news among themselves. There were meetings and arguments and gossip in the street; there was weeping and lamenting. The people were downcast: they went about with their heads bowed down and greeted each other with tears.”
When Cortes’ march began, some cities chose to welcome the Spaniards in an attempt to align themselves with Cortes, while others debated whether to take a stand or not. This gave us a great perspective of the varying confidence levels between the tribes in regard to their ability to defend themselves. In Tlaxcala, the lords of Tlaxcala “guided them to the city; they brought them there and invited them to enter. They paid them great honors, attended to their every want, joined with them as allies.” In Tenochtitlan, “when Motecuhzoma learned what had happened in Tezcoco, he called together his nephew Cacama, his brother Cuitlahuac and the other lords. He proposed a long discussion in order to decide whether they should welcome the Christians when they arrived, and if so, in what manner. Cuitlahuac replied that they should not welcome them in any manner, but Cacama disagreed, saying that it would show a want of courage to deny them entrance once they were at the gates. He added that it was not proper for a great lord like his uncle to turn away the ambassadors of another great prince. If the visitors made any demands which displeased Motecuhzoma, he could punish their insolence by sending his hosts of brave warriors against them.”
From Chapter 8, The Spaniards Arrive in Tenochtitlan, to Chapter 13, The Surrender of Tenochtitlan, a detailed account of the events that took place in the Aztec capital are given. It describes how Motecuhzoma met with Cortes, “He showered gifts upon them and hung flowers around their necks; he gave them necklaces of flowers and bands of flowers to adorn their breasts; he set garlands of flowers upon their heads. Then he hung the gold necklaces around their necks and gave them presents of every sort as gifts of welcome.” It also provides details on how the Spaniards imprisoned the Aztec King, took possession of the city, and seized all of his treasures.
The book gives a detailed description of The Massacre in the Main Temple During the Fiesta of Toxcatl that occurred during the Spaniards’ possession of the city. These events display the brutality of the Spaniards and the decision of the Aztec people to fight back and retaliate against the occupation of their city. The Spaniards Attack the Celebrants section of Chapter 9 describes it as follows: “when the dance was loveliest and when song was linked to song, the Spaniards were seized with an urge to kill the celebrants. They all ran forward, armed as if for battle. They closed the entrances and passageways, all the gates of the patio: the Eagle Gate in the lesser palace, the Gate of the Canestalk and the Gate of the serpent of mirrors.” “They attacked all the celebrants, stabbing them, spearing them, striking them with their swords. They attacked some of them from behind, and these fell instantly to the ground with their entrails hanging out. Others they beheaded: they cut off their heads, or split their heads to pieces.”
The Aztecs Retaliate section tells us: “when the news of this massacre was heard outside the Sacred Patio, a great cry went up: "Mexicanos, come running! Bring your spears and shields! The strangers have murdered our warriors!" The Aztecs were obviously enraged by the horrendous attack on their warriors during a time of celebration. The book displays the emotions of these people well and, even though it gave them a stronger will to fight, they would only last so long.
Throughout the book The Broken Spears we are introduced to the array of emotions and perspectives of the indigenous people, as told by the indigenous people. We are given a chance to see that there were a number of different interactions with Cortes and his army. This detailed account of the events surrounding the Conquest of Mexico provides the opportunity to see much more of the story than a textbook can allow.
The textbook, Traditions and Encounters, only gives a brief outline of the conquest of the city of Tenochtitlan. It does not give details of those events or the meetings between the natives and Cortes. It does not give information on any of the other cities that were massacred or surrendered to Cortes. All of the information in the textbook is delivered from a European attempt at objectivity. The amount space provided in a history book such as this for an in-depth review of these events is very limited. There is mention of the timeframe, 1519-1521, that Cortez was in Mexico, but the story begins at the point where he lead his soldiers to the Aztec capital which is approximately seven months after he first arrived.
In conclusion, while I think that the textbook Transitions and Encounters is a great tool for getting a snapshot of history, the book The Broken Spears is a great piece of work for the details of the Conquest of Mexico. Although I had a very difficult time deciphering which native was which and what city was where, I found the book very informative. The detailed accounts of what happened, as told by the victims “who managed to survive the persecution and death that attended the final struggle,” provide the perfect window into the events not covered in our textbook.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
“Burying the White Gods: New Perspectives on the Conquest of Mexico,” by Camilla Townsend, hits the points of why the Native Americans were submissive to the Spaniards. The thesis, in short, says that the Native Americans were not exactly conquered by the conquistadors. Instead, they thought the Cortes was a god, Quetzalcoatl. This in no way indicates the development, or lack thereof, in the Aztec society. The Aztecs invited the conquistadors into their society as gods; they were not conquered, per say, because of the Spain being unbearable.…
- 403 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Cycles of Conquest, by Edward H. Spicer, is notably a classic, “essential” book for readers learning about the history of cultural change in the southwest. Published in 1962, Spicer’s work offers a scope of the histories of southwestern Native Americans—based on available knowledge. Edward Spicer introduces the first part of his book by stating several times that the historical lens is distorted because it is the history of the Spanish and their contacts with Native Americans, rather than the history of the Natives, from the Natives. He writes, “it is in full recognition of the fact that the information about the Indians themselves is secondhand and terribly biased that the exposition of the ‘history’ of the contacts of the Indians of northwestern…
- 808 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
_The Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of _Mexico, edited and with an introduction by Miguel Leon-Portillo (Boston: Beacon Press, 1992), pp. 196 Reviewed by: Nicholas Adams Broken Spears is an accumulated, chronological collection of texts and accounts of the invasion of the Aztec empire by the Spanish from April 22, 1519 to August 13, 1521. This time period from arrival to the surrender of the Aztec empire to the Spanish is filled with interactions between two different people and the events that encompass what it takes to conquer an indigenous people with complete disregard. Broken Spears also allows the history of the conquest of the Aztec empire to be seen from the Aztec point of view, as priests and natives who survived…
- 873 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The fifteenth-century Renaissance and the beginnings of European exploration, conquest, and colonization are part of the same narrativeone in which culture, science, religion, politics, and power are inextricably intertwined. Innovations in science and technology made long-distance travel and exploration possible. The desire of rulers for wealth and power financed conquest, and the desire of the Roman Catholic church for converts provided religious motivation for the subjection of the indigenous peoples of the Americas. Upon reaching Central Mexico, Spanish explorers found themselves confronted with the Nahua people, commonly known as Aztecs, of whom the largest tribe was the Mexica. Stuart B. Schwartz's Victors and Vanquished: Spanish and Nahua Views of the Conquest of Mexico contains opposing versions of the defeat and destruction of the flourishing sixteenth-century civilization of the Nahua.…
- 501 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Anderson also shared his views of Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book The Broken Spears. According to Arthur J.O. Anderson even though Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book is mostly of the defeat, the chaos, and grief the Aztecs endured, it is also a story that wanted to remind Spain of their debt they owe to the Aztecs . In my opinion, I also felt that this story was written to make the Spanish aware of their dark history and chaos they brought to ancient Mesoamerica. The book is written in the Aztec perspective and it depicts the Spanish as greedy, careless men who tried to annihilate any trace of Mesoamerican culture and tried to enforce their own way of life. So I do agree with Anderson and feel that the Spanish do owe a huge debt to the natives of Mesoamerican. Anderson also discussed how many natives after the conquest of Mexico were taught by Spanish Francian friars to read and write Spanish and Latin as well as to put their native language into Latin. Unos annles de la nacion Mexicana written in 1528 put native accounts written in Nahuatl with Spanish translation from the Franciscan fathers into one source. The Broken Spears included writings which traced back to the first transliterations such as Unos annles de la nacion Mexicana or The Codex Florentino and many other accounts. Anderson deeply appreciated the energy, artistry and poetry that went in Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book. He felt that Leon-Portilla selected a decent background of the Aztec culture and used effective sources that told the descriptions of the natives very well. He felt that the reader would find Leon-Portilla’s work to be interesting, accurate, and useful to…
- 796 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Broken Spears is written by Miguel Leon-Portilla, he gives the accounts of which the Aztec Empire falls to the Spanish in the 16th century. The book, Broken Spears, shows the view of the Aztecs more over than the Spanish, Miguel Leon-Portilla describes the many reasons as to why the Spanish were successful in the victory against the Aztec empire. The Spanish had technology advantages over the Aztecs, and they also had the poor leadership of Motecuhzoma. One of the most notable factors that caused the fall of the Aztecs was the plague, this factor was very effective and an advantage that helped the Spaniards succeeded over the Aztec Empire. The Spanish had many advantages over the Aztecs which is why they had such a strong victory, such as, religion, leadership, and technology.…
- 616 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Spaniards allied with the Tlaxcalan indians and marched into Tenochtitlan. Montezuma welcomed in Quetzalcoatl’s men with open arms, but Hernan Cortes seized power of the empire by using Montezuma as a figurehead against his will, while Cortes made all the real decisions. Cortes acted as a secret leader until 1520, when events caused tension to escalate, and Cortes demanded Montezuma command his people obey the Spaniards. The Indians didn’t like this at all, and showered their leader in stones, he then went on to die days later in June of 1520. The spanish originally went to Mexico to search for land and gold, or other plunders because they had no prosperity back home in Spain. When they reached Mexico, they discovered the Aztec people and the native indians of the land, and decided to try to eliminate them and their ways (cannibalism, human sacrifices, etc. didn’t appeal to the Spanish, and they didn’t want people like that inhabiting the same land as…
- 394 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In Aztec time, their self made weapons had changed dramatically after the arrival of the Spanish. Aztec weapons were improved with much stronger ones from the Spanish. There are a few long and short term effects between both of the nations. This essay will explain the short and long term effects of the arrival of the Spanish on Aztec warfare.…
- 653 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
While reading “Broken Spears”, written by Miguel Leon-Portilla, I’ve had a small view of what Mexican culture was like back in those times. They are sort of different from America’s traditions and societies. Broken Spears is unlike others written about the loss of the empire because it was written from the point of the Aztecs and not the Spanish. As the book goes on, Miguel Leon-Portilla describes how the Spanish were successful in taking over the solid empire. The book really starts out by giving a clear background of the beliefs and culture. Motecuhzoma is seen as scary because he made his people surrender. I respect the Indians and Aztecs because their morals and customs were Christian like and seemed as if they did the right thing…
- 472 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When discussing the importance of Spanish alliances, it is important to discuss Matthew Restall’s interpretation of “the myth of the white conquistador”. A common myth in regards to the Spanish Conquest is that the Aztecs were conquered by a small group of white Spanish men. Within Restall’s book titled “Seven Myths of the Spanish Conquest”, he debunks the myth of the white conquistadors. Restall’s argues that “there is no doubt that the Spanish were consistently outnumbered by native enemies on the battlefield. But what has so often been ignored or forgotten is the fact that Spaniards tended also to be outnumbered by their own native allies. Furthermore, the invisible warriors of this myth took an additional form, that of the Africans, free and enslave, who accompanied Spanish…
- 443 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The myth is that the conquistadors conquered the America’s relatively quickly in a sovereign effort but Restall explains that the Spaniards had a lot of help from the Natives and African’s and the “completion” of conquest was anything but; as mass portions of the land remained unscathed by the conquest. Restall effortlessly explains how the conquistador myths of superior communication between the Spaniards and Natives were just as fabricated as the modern misconception of inferior communication by historians. The communication between the two, or lack thereof, fell somewhere between both myths. Restall uses his concise writing style to explain the resilience of the Natives, debunking the myth of Native desolation and how the myth of superiority derives from Eurocentric beliefs of racial dominance which lead to racist ideologies that “underpinned colonial expansion from the late fifteenth to early twentieth centuries.”…
- 904 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A. This document describes how although all narratives about the people and cultures begin with the arrival of Europeans too much credit is being given to their “discoveries” because before the Europeans the Native Americans (Aztecs) were doing the things the Europeans claimed to be doing first. The Aztecs came up with a way of living and a way of doing things before the Europeans did. Before the Europeans arrival the Aztecs had already created a powerful Empire.…
- 1711 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The aztecs thought it was a warning that their empire was going to fall. In 1519, a spanish explorer (Hernando Cortes) arrived at the east coast of mexico. He defeated the local tribes and set off for the Aztecs. When he arrived at the city, the spaniards captured the emperor, took him as a prisoner, and killed him.…
- 151 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
_Myths of the Spanish Conquest_ is broken into seven chapters, each dedicated to a different myth or mis-conception regarding the Spanish conquest. In debunking these myths, Matthew Restall works with three themes regarding the conquest. First, that the European discovery of the Americas was one of the greatest events in human history. Second, that the conquest was the achievement of "a few great men," which he subsequently describes as "a handful of adventurers." These two themes lead to a third theme, or question. "If history's greatest event - the European discovery and conquest of the Americas - was achieved by a mere "handful of adventurers," how did they do it?"…
- 915 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Aztecs were a highly ritualistic civilization devoted to divination and their Gods. The Aztec calendar stone was created as a divinatory tool which was used for rituals, to forecast the future, and to determine which days were lucky and which days not for the outcome of various actions and events (Smith 254). The calendar had two systems. It had the sacred Tonalpohualli, which was based on the 260-day cycle and the Iuhpohualli, which was a 365-day cycle (Palfrey). Seen by the count, there is a five day difference between these two calendars. The five day differences were thought to be the most unholy, unlucky days of the year (Smith 257). The world was thought to be coming to an end.…
- 1590 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays