“Thresholds of Violence” is an article featured on The New Yorker written by Malcolm Gladwell. The article is written in regards to a young man, John LaDue, who has been arrested on several accounts which center around a planned attack on his high school. Gladwell utilizes LaDue as an example to portray the rising concern about gun violence in schools today. Gladwell is attempting to represent the minimal impact a person’s mental state and history has on his ability to commit heinous crimes such as partaking in school shootings. He indicates no clear audience but, is speaking to the population of America as a whole. His argument is extremely effective through his manipulation of context and Aristotle’s Appeal logos.…
When he was strapped to the hospital gurney, he had some final words for the people he hurt. Why would someone who will be dead in a matter of minutes care to speak to the family of his victims. A person who is not remorseful or rehabilitated would leave this Earth leaving the victims’ family knowing he was not. A non-rehabilitated person would not care to say he was sorry. Wasting time, to get under the skin is not on the agenda for someone who is leaving this world. Nobles said his final words to the family because they will remember this day. They will remember the look in his eyes. He had a final saying to each member. The family will not forget the words he spoke to them individually. Nobles clearly states he is sorry, when he said, “I know you won’t believe me, but I am truly sorry for what I have done. I wish I could undo what happened back the and bring back your loved ones but I can’t.” Here, Nobles would not waste time telling the family he is remorseful, showing he had changed. A true non-remorseful person will not care to try one last time to prove he is rehabilitated and a different man. Nobles does not want to die, leaving behind the families thinking he was the same man the day he murdered the two girls and seriously injured Ron Ross. After he said his words to each member who was there to view the execution,…
As we experience more of our surroundings, we begin to understand it more. At the end of the Scorch Trials, Thomas slowly begins to understand what Teresa has been through and therefore is more willing to consider the rebirth of their friendship. “I did what I had to do in the Maze, and being all buddy-buddy seemed like my best shot… All we had to do was to get you here to pass the Trials. And it’s either you or us.” This was what Teresa said to make Thomas feel betrayed and therefore saved him. It also shows the mysterious enigma of why Teresa was doing this to him. Thomas hurt a lot due to the fact that he thought that since he and Teresa had gone through so much together already, they could trust each other no matter what. “During times which are desperate and only the fittest can survive, Thomas tries to stop thinking about she is doing this to him, but actually how to survive. “Get away from me, Tom... all of you need to get... away... from me. Don't argue. Just leave. Run.” This shows that Teresa, despite her being in agony and distress, tires to warn Thomas that something is really wrong. Because Thomas has already put a lot of trust in her, he refuses to leave her to…
There is a maze, and if anyone who does not exit the maze before night time is killed by a creature called a griever. There are rules against people going in the maze unless you are one of the few runners. Thomas goes in and kills a griever breaking the rules. Gally, a rules enforcer scolds him for going against the rules, since he thinks killing the griever would upset them and they would all be killed. A large portion of the children are killed by a griever attack, but Thomas’ actions led to a small number of the children being able escape the maze. Thomas trying new ideas got only 10 children out of the maze and without Thomas coming with a different mindset and perspective, they would have never had a chance to escape the maze. The Maze Runner is clear with the…
Mr. Walter Cunningham and a mob of men drove up to the jail where Tom was staying ready to attack, “... Atticus was sitting propped against the front door”(Lee, 201) No matter how much they threatened Atticus, he wasn't letting anyone through to kill an innocent man. Even though the mob that arrived at the jail with Mr. Cunningham showed that they still had much respect for Atticus.…
Rosa Parks faced many stereotypes. As an example, in a biography about Rosa Parks, “BIOGRAPHY”, you will find that Rosa Parks was an activist that was always fighting for education and civil rights. For example, in the Rosa Parks biography, “BIOGRAPHY”, it says, “Raymond…received little formal education due to racial segregation… He supported and encouraged Rosa’s desire to complete her formal education” (BIOGRAPHY). This evidence shows that stereotypes impact society because it shows how Rosa’s husband, Raymond, couldn’t complete his education since people didn’t think that African-Americans were important enough to be fully educated.…
In “To Kill A Mockingbird” Tom is kept in a jail cell in the center of the town. One night while Atticus is keeping look out outside the cell a mob of town’s men surround Atticus. The town wants to beat and kill Tom for allegedly raping a white woman. Atticus stands his ground, along with Jem and Scout who join him on the stairs in front of the cell. The family continues to defend Tom, but the…
Capital punishment is something that has been debated over by the public for ages whether if it is impartial to take away another human’s life. For politicians it’s a way to extract dangerous criminals, but is it appropriate to take another human life due to a crime? “A Hanging” by George Orwell presents the perspective of a guard ordered to take a prisoner to the gallows for hanging as a result of an unknown crime. Throughout the essay Orwell uses symbolism of life and death to convey his animosity towards the capital punishment through the perspective of a guard in Burma during British Imperialism. “A Hanging” a hanging by George Orwell uses examples of life and death to assert Orwell’s distain towards capital punishment before the hanging of the prisoner, at the gallows, and after the hanging.…
John F. Kennedy once said, "conformity is the jailer of freedom and the enemy of growth." 1984, a dystopian novel, was written by George Orwell. Remarkably ahead of its time with an ancient publication date of 1949, the novel deals with very modern ideas such as the government overreaching its power, and the rise of technology. The author utilizes the backdrop of an extremely oppressive, totalitarian government named Big Brother to demonstrate that humanity naturally desires nonconformity, but when put in the worst of scenarios, chooses conformity out of self-preservation.…
The audience gets a glimpse into the hanging of a Burmese prisoner in George Orwell's personal essay "A Hanging." He employs techniques, such as the use of simile and imagery, which are effective in appealing to the emotions of the reader. By reaching out to the audience in such a way, Orwell is able to press upon them his negative attitude towards capital punishment.…
Tom isnt just some negro, in the eyes of Atticus, hes another human being just like him. Going into the case, it should have been a one and done, being that a "white man's word against a black man's, the white man always wins." (295) Back in those times, such a verdict were the black man’s testimony was even considered was unheard of. The fact that Atticus even took the case and actually presented a great testimony, is probably the bravest thing a man could do. He was able to defy the county norms, and stick up for true justice and equality.…
This aimless killing obviously could not continue for long, as peoples started to realize that their property was being destroyed. Monetary compensation was only given if a slave was executed under the law. Since slavers were a key economic asset, it was only appropriate that the suspected rebels should be tried in a court. With the death sentence being issued by a judge, the slave owner could be compensated, and the blood lust could be sated. Shifting toward a more appropriate action, the death…
Reading for academic purposes and reading for pleasure, they can be perceived as opposites when in essence they are mostly the same. With each the object is to read a work of literature and gain knowledge or experience from its contents, and with both methods one can recognize patterns, themes, and analogies. One can notice the similarities among novels and assume that the hero will win in the end without much thought. The key difference that distinguishes academic reading is the fact that it requires a conscious effort to connect seemingly disparate characters, events, and even stories to gain true understanding of the work. An example, albeit a simple one, would be George Orwell’s Animal Farm. In his novel, although never directly stated,…
In the satirical novel Animal Farm, George Orwell describes interaction between animals on a farm like in the human world. These animals are not estranged from human characteristics and act like humans. Although a kind of constitution has been drafted, the seven commandments, to which all animals should live up to, it becomes clear along the way that certain animals or groups have no intention to stick to these regulations. Snowball, the former leader of the pigs, was expelled from the farm. Napoleon took over and started making decisions that were solely for the benefit of his own group, the pigs. [point #1] “Some of the animals [are] disturbed when they [hear] that the pigs not only [take] their meals in the kitchen and [use] the drawing-room as a recreation room, but also [sleep] in the beds” even though they have seven commandments under which one is “no animal shall sleep in a bed” (Orwell, 49) [example #1] Orwell has the pigs use the farmhouse as their residence and there by makes it clear that they are the leaders. In this case they have the benefit of taking their meals in the kitchen, having recreation rooms and sleeping in beds. Squealer convinced the…
Anger in Animal Farm is still going on as long as there is deceit and treachery. Snowball tries to wreak havoc on the farm by all means as a reaction to his outrage. Napoleon has discovered Snowball's footprints as "he steal[s] the corn, he upset[s] the milk-pails, he break[s] the eggs, he trample[s] the seedbeds, he gnaw[s] the bark off the fruit trees" (Orwell 78). Not only does Snowball damage the farm, but something horrible is discovered; Squealer mentions that "Snowball has sold himself to Frederick of Pinchfield Farm, who is even now plotting to attack [them] and take [their] away from [them]!" (Orwell 79). But what is worse is that Snowball has been in alliance with Mr. Jones, Squealer points out that "Snowball [has] [been] in league…