Preview

BUGusa

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
BUGusa
Case Scenarios: BUGusa, Inc.
LAW/421 Business Law
Jose D. Gomez, Joe Mulero, and John Paez
November 5, 2014
Donnie McGilbra

University of Phoenix Material

BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet

Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement
Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain.

No tort was committed for the advertisement. Although Wiretime, Inc. attempted to gain customers by speaking low of BUGusa, Inc., freedom of speech was practiced by the post of the advertisement. Freedom of speech is allowed just as long as no physical change or physical play is displayed. Politician commercials are a prime example of this sort of advertisement.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet)
Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain.

Because Janet resigned and accepted the offer of WIRETIME, Inc. she committed a tort. A non-compete clause is a serious contract that can lead to severe punishment and fines. No matter if Janet was fired or if she quit, if she works for a competitor within the 2-year non-compete clause contract, illegal action has been committed and she will be punished one way or the other. If she would of resigned, and then waited 2 years to employee with WIRETIME, Inc. then no tort would have been committed.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter)
Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions.

Scenario: BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot
What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your answer.

Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. (Randy and Brian)
What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your answer.

Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. (Sally)
Sally may have a successful case against BUGusa, Inc., for what torts? Explain your answer.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    bugusa worksheet

    • 491 Words
    • 3 Pages

    BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts If so, explain. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts If so, explain. In this case Janet is working for BUGusa, the contract she signed will be valid for 2 more years. In the contract it states that Janet is not to work for any competitors wither it is if she breaks the contract by leaving the company or if she is fired. Both Janet and WIretime are guilty of breaking the contract. The Tort that has been committed is known as Current Contractual Relationship Tort. The more money and the incentive of the sign on bonus of five thousand dollars is an infringement of the contract Janet is affiliated with. Wiretime has committed a tort by enticing Janet to break her current contract. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walters actions. Scenario BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc. Explain your answer. Scenario BUGusa, Inc. (Randy and Brian) What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc. Explain your answer. Scenario BUGusa, Inc. (Sally) Sally may have a successful case against BUGusa, Inc., for what torts Explain your answer. Bugusa, Inc. Worksheet LAW/421 Version 2 PAGE MERGEFORMAT 1 Y, dXiJ(x( I_TS 1EZBmU/xYy5g/GMGeD3Vqq8K)fw9…

    • 491 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WIRETIME’s Human Resource Manager is in breach of intentional tort for promising Janet a Lead position and ten percent raise plus a signing bonus of $5,000 if Janet agrees to work for WIRETIME, Inc. Janet told the Manager she had two years left on her current contract. The Human Resource Manager’s attempt to persuade Janet to abandon the contract and accept employment at WIRETIME was intentional. Under the term of the contract, Janet’s termination or her decision to quit meant she could not accept employment at another competitor of BUGusa Inc. The fact these companies are competitors, the Human Resource Manager at WIRTIME, Inc. under assumption should be aware that this is overstepping since it is most likely WIRETIME, Inc. makes their employees sign noncompeting agreements. A Human Resource Manager of a competing company should very much be aware of the rules and guidelines relating to…

    • 915 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It210 Inchworm Code

    • 256 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Design a program that models the worm’s behavior in the following scenario. Be sure to include the completed analysis section:…

    • 256 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence applies in this scenario. Negligence is described as a party who fails to act reasonably, even when the act is not intentionally, or it does not intend for harm to occur (Melvin, 2011).…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Tort was committed by WIRETIME, Inc. which means “a civil wrong where on party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, S.P., 2011) The statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. will potentially harm Bugusa, Inc. reputation. A statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. accusing Bugusa, Inc. products were low quality and did not work past a months’ time. This type of statement is a defamatory “A false and defamatory…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa, Inc., Worksheet

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Clear and specific reference to the disparaged product. WIRETIME makes defamatory statements about a specific company [BUGusa (BUG)] as well as to the specific product that BUG manufactures (BUG’s electronic recording devices).…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    for strict liability torts. BUGusa, Inc. failed to provide an insulator in their original design for their wire tappers due to the production cost. BUGusa, Inc. has since realized its mistake, yet did not recall the older versions of the equipment, leaving Sally at risk of injury, which is exactly what happened. Strict Liability can be defined, as; “the legal responsibility for damages or injury, even if the person found strictly liable is not at fault.” (USLegal.com, 2014). Under this definition, Sally does not have to prove that BUGusa, Inc. was negligent in their actions producing their product, just that the product in question was defective, and it caused her…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems WIRETIME, Inc. (a relatively new competitor) committed intentional tort advertising negative information in a well-known industry magazine in regard to BUGusa, Inc.’s devices being low quality and stating the devices works for one month only. An intentional tort occurs when a party intentionally caused another party to suffer injury or damage (Larson, 2005). In this particular scenario, WIRETIME, Inc. posting an advertisement as such participated in a libel act. A libel act involves making defamatory statements in a fixed medium, such as a magazine or newspaper (Larson, 2005). Defamation is considered as an act of harming the reputation of a person or company by making false statements to another person or company (Larson, 2005).…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quiz One

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1) Patty owned Patty’s Cakes in Jacksonville, Florida. She sold her business to Fruity’s, Inc. a national pastry company. There was a non-compete agreement in the contract for the sale of her business. In the non-compete, Patty agreed not to work in any capacity in the food industry for 10 years on the entire east coast. A court would likely determine that the non-compete agreement…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bodyworks Case

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bodyworks’ non-compete clause satisfies the first four elements of enforceability but fails the fifth element because it is against “public policy.” In the early 1900’s, non-competition clauses were usually not upheld because these provisions were seen as a restraint of trade which was against public policy. See Mar-Hof Co. v. Rosenbacker, 97 S.E. 169 (N.C. 1918). North Carolina law says that “no contract or agreement hereafter made, limiting the rights of any person to do business anywhere in the State of North Carolina shall be enforceable unless such agreement is in writing duly signed by the party who agrees not to enter into any such business within such territory.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-4. Over time though, North Carolina courts became more open to non-compete provision, but the covenant had to satisfy a five-part test to determine if it was enforceable. United Labs., Inc. v. Kuykendall, 370 S.E.2d 375, 380 (N.C. 1988). It is enforceable if it is (1) in writing; (2) made part of a contract of employment; (3) based on valuable consideration; (4) reasonable both as to time and territory; and (5) not against public policy. Id. The fifth element, not against public policy, is met when it is intended to protect a “legitimate interest” of the covenantee and is not so broad as to be “oppressive to the covenantor or the public health”. Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic, P.A. v. Petrozza, 373 S.E.2d 449, 453 (N.C. Ct. App. 1988). If honoring the contract would create a substantial harm to the public health, “the public interests outweigh the contract interests of the covenantee, and the court…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why isn’t advertising falling underneath the same scrutiny as when a company or person is…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. During the year ended October 31, 2011 Asher Farms processed 343.6 million chickens, or approximately 2.0 billion dressed pounds and is the 4th largest processor of dressed chickens in the United States.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question: There are no accountants on the board of the Oriole Corporation, a privately held corporation. The board routinely relies on a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) to explain the financial situation of the corporation. The board does not do an independent analysis of the CPA¿s report. In these circumstances, the board is…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torts study notes

    • 17104 Words
    • 69 Pages

    In Part III, I propose we take seriously a mixed theory of tort law, which can attend to both deterrence and corrective justice. In suggesting this, I review a limited number of tort doctrines and show how the combination of deterrence and justice can provide a better or fuller explanation for these doctrines than can either theory standing on its own. In this…

    • 17104 Words
    • 69 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    <Lawpublish.com/firstamend>. “First Amendment in Advertising.” Cuyohoga Falls Law Industry, Harvard Law University, Web. 28 November 2012.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays